Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Alief Montessori Community School in Houston, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 65
Address
 4215 H ST
Houston, TX 77072
Telephone
(281) 530-9406
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
65
Students
294
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
10.7
Free lunch eligible students
140
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
36
School district
ALIEF MONTESSORI COMMUNITY SCHOOL
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Alief Montessori Community School:

65
OUTLEY EL (1.3 miles):

62
CHANCELLOR EL (0.9 miles):

58
YOUENS EL (0.3 miles):

47
ALIEF MIDDLE (0.3 miles):

38
HASTINGS H S (0.4 miles):

28
ELSIK H S (0.7 miles):

26
MARTIN EL (1.4 miles):

26
BUDEWIG INT (1.5 miles):

25
Alief Montessori Community School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Harris County:

51
Houston:

47
Alief Montessori Community School:

65

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 294
Enrollment in 2015: 296
Enrollment in 2014: 283
Enrollment in 2013: 297
Enrollment in 2012: 280
Enrollment in 2011: 242
Enrollment in 2010: 238
Enrollment in 2009: 224
Enrollment in 2008: 218
Enrollment in 2007: 205
Enrollment in 2006: 213
Enrollment in 2005: 198
Enrollment in 2004: 162
Enrollment in 2003: 155
Enrollment in 2002: 135
Enrollment in 2001: 99
Enrollment in 2000: 93
Enrollment in 1999: 105

Alief Montessori Community School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students94413739322625294
Female students53212021201611162
Male students41201718121014132
Asian students45221081088111
Hispanic students25111719121014108
Black students14791097258
White students9 - 1211115
Two or More Races students11 - - - - - 2

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 94
Kindergarten enrollment: 41
1st grade enrollment: 37
2nd grade enrollment: 39
3rd grade enrollment: 32
4th grade enrollment: 26
5th grade enrollment: 25

Alief Montessori Community School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 162 (55.1%)
School:

55.1%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 132 (44.9%)
Alief Montessori Community School:

44.9%
Texas:

50.1%

Alief Montessori Community School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Asian enrollment: 111 (37.8%)
Alief Montessori Community School:

37.8%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 108 (36.7%)
Alief Montessori Community School:

36.7%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 58 (19.7%)
Here:

19.7%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 15 (5.1%)
Here:

5.1%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 2 (0.7%)
School:

0.7%
Texas:

2.1%

Alief Montessori Community School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 176 (59.9%)
School:

59.9%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 140 (47.6%)
Alief Montessori Community School:

47.6%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 36 (12.2%)
Alief Montessori Community School:

12.2%
State:

6.2%

Alief Montessori Community School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 10.7

Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

27.6
State:

15.6

Alief Montessori Community School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $932,552
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 11 (Salary Expenditures: $687,087)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 12.2 (Salary Expenditures: $118,383)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $127,081)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $171,624
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $1,001,226
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $706,073
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 12.2 (Salary Expenditures: $163,282)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $131,871)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $202,053

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic85
  • Asian94
  • Black10
  • White10
  • Multirace4
  • IDEA13
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 203 (male: 103, female: 100)
  • Hispanic: 85 (male: 41, female: 44)
  • Asian: 94 (male: 47, female: 47)
  • Black: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 13 (male: 8, female: 5)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 11 (male: 7, female: 4)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained

    Total number of students retained in 2nd grade

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian2
  • LEP7
  • IDEA2
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Alief Montessori Community School:

15.4%
State:

4.8%
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Here:

6.3%
State:

4.1%
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
Alief Montessori Community School:

8.0%
State:

4.3%

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,489
  • Males1,519
  • Females1,474
  • Hispanic1,478
Math Average Scale Score:

1,489
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 20
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 20

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.4 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

15%
35%
30%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,519, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 29%)
43%
28%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,474, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 15%)
23%
31%
31%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,478, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 18%)
18%
27%
37%
18%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,483
  • Males1,496
  • Females1,476
  • Hispanic1,481
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,483
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 19
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 20

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.9 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

5%
42%
21%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,496, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 29%)
29%
42%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,476, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 33%)
8%
50%
9%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,481, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 27%)
9%
36%
28%
27%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,553
  • Males1,572
  • Females1,531
  • Hispanic1,544
  • Asian1,577
  • Black1,547
Math Average Scale Score:

1,553
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 24
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 24

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.6 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 41%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

21%
25%
41%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 69%, Masters: 0%)
8%
23%
69%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,531, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 27%)
36%
28%
9%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,544, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 10%)
30%
20%
40%
10%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,577, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
17%
33%
17%
33%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,547, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 67%, Masters: 0%)
17%
16%
67%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,545
  • Males1,572
  • Females1,517
  • Hispanic1,536
  • Asian1,510
  • Black1,616
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,545
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 23
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 24

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.5 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.2 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 30%

17%
31%
22%
30%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 42%)
17%
16%
25%
42%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,517, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 18%)
18%
46%
18%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,536, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 30%)
30%
10%
30%
30%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,510, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
17%
50%
33%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,616, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 67%)
33%
67%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,811
  • Males3,833
  • Females3,785
  • Hispanic3,796
  • Asian3,694
  • Black3,983
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,811
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 24
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 24

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.5 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.6 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 46%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

25%
29%
46%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,833, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 0%)
23%
31%
46%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,785, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 0%)
27%
28%
45%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,796, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 0%)
30%
10%
60%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 3,694, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
50%
17%
33%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,983, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 0%)
50%
50%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,610
  • Males1,608
  • Females1,611
  • Hispanic1,575
  • Asian1,677
Math Average Scale Score:

1,610
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 21
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 21

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.1 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.2 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.7 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 52%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

10%
33%
52%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,608, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 63%, Masters: 0%)
13%
25%
63%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,611, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 8%)
8%
38%
46%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,575, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 0%)
15%
47%
38%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,677, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 20%)
20%
60%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,605
  • Males1,556
  • Females1,635
  • Hispanic1,567
  • Asian1,668
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,605
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 21
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 21

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.4 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.4 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

19%
29%
33%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,556, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
25%
37%
25%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,635, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 23%)
15%
23%
39%
23%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,567, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 15%)
31%
38%
16%
15%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,668, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 20%)
20%
60%
20%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,693
  • Males3,696
  • Females3,691
  • Hispanic3,539
  • Asian4,017
Science Average Scale Score:

3,693
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 21
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 21

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.3 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.4 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

48%
23%
24%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,696, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 0%)
38%
25%
38%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,691, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 8%)
54%
23%
15%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,539, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 58%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
58%
25%
17%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,017, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 17%)
17%
33%
33%
17%
6th Grade
Math students tested: 3
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 3

Reading students tested: 3
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 3

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic13
  • Asian13
  • Black4
  • White4
  • LEP25
  • IDEA2
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 34 (male: 17, female: 17)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 2, female: 11)
  • Asian: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

115.6
Texas:

147.9

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Houston, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Houston main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Alief Montessori Community School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents