Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Farmers Branch Elementary School in Farmers Branch, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 79
Address
 13521 TOM FIELD RD
Farmers Branch, TX 75234
Telephone
(972) 968-1600
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.cfbisd.edu
City-data.com school rating
79
Students
557
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
35.0
Free lunch eligible students
411
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
64
School district
CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
STARK EL (0.9 miles):

88
Farmers Branch Elementary School:

79
CENTRAL EL (1.2 miles):

73
WILLIAM L CABELL EL (1.5 miles):

71
BLAIR EL (0.8 miles):

55
MCLAUGHLIN STRICKLAND EL (1.4 miles):

45
TURNER H S (1.3 miles):

43
FIELD MIDDLE (0.2 miles):

32
DALLAS CAN ACADEMY AT CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH (1.0 miles):

7
Farmers Branch Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Dallas County:

53
Farmers Branch:

51
Farmers Branch Elementary School:

79

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 557
Enrollment in 2015: 566
Enrollment in 2014: 540
Enrollment in 2013: 504
Enrollment in 2012: 497
Enrollment in 2011: 506
Enrollment in 2010: 493
Enrollment in 2009: 493
Enrollment in 2008: 516
Enrollment in 2007: 508
Enrollment in 2006: 524
Enrollment in 2005: 533
Enrollment in 2004: 575
Enrollment in 2003: 575
Enrollment in 2002: 584
Enrollment in 2001: 548
Enrollment in 2000: 551
Enrollment in 1999: 596

Farmers Branch Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students67849386766883557
Female students26434447273045262
Male students41414939493838295
Asian students21 - 1 - 2 - 6
Hispanic students52718674676176487
Black students22223 - 213
White students9105945547
Two or More Races students2 - - - 2 - - 4

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 67
Kindergarten enrollment: 84
1st grade enrollment: 93
2nd grade enrollment: 86
3rd grade enrollment: 76
4th grade enrollment: 68
5th grade enrollment: 83

Farmers Branch Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 262 (47.0%)
Farmers Branch Elementary School:

47.0%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 295 (53.0%)
School:

53.0%
Texas:

50.1%

Farmers Branch Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Asian enrollment: 6 (1.1%)
School:

1.1%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 487 (87.4%)
School:

87.4%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 13 (2.3%)
Farmers Branch Elementary School:

2.3%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 47 (8.4%)
School:

8.4%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 4 (0.7%)
School:

0.7%
State:

2.1%

Farmers Branch Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 475 (85.3%)
Farmers Branch Elementary School:

85.3%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 411 (73.8%)
Farmers Branch Elementary School:

73.8%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 64 (11.5%)
Here:

11.5%
State:

6.2%

Farmers Branch Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 35

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 5
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Farmers Branch Elementary School:

15.9
Texas:

15.6

Farmers Branch Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,899,630
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 32.5 (Salary Expenditures: $1,731,821)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $56,963)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 7 (Salary Expenditures: $151,144)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $79,495
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,398,446
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,911,343
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $81,550)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 7 (Salary Expenditures: $252,792)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 7 (Salary Expenditures: $153,534)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $103,681

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic241
  • Asian4
  • White2
  • IDEA22
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 247 (male: 118, female: 129)
  • Hispanic: 241 (male: 116, female: 125)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 22 (male: 17, female: 5)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 70 (male: 50, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 59 (male: 46, female: 13)
  • White: 11 (male: 4, female: 7)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 26 (male: 19, female: 7)

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 5 (all male)

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

11.9%
Texas:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Farmers Branch Elementary School:

2.2%
Texas:

6.1%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

10.8
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,500
  • Males1,495
  • Females1,506
  • Hispanic1,497
  • White1,538
Math Average Scale Score:

1,500
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 94
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 94

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.2 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 30%

13%
35%
22%
30%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,495, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 29%)
12%
33%
26%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,506, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 31%)
13%
38%
18%
31%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,497, Tested: 86, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 29%)
14%
35%
22%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,538, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
33%
34%
33%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,440
  • Males1,424
  • Females1,460
  • Hispanic1,433
  • White1,479
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,440
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 49
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.7 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.2 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

27%
32%
17%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,424, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 19%)
33%
34%
14%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,460, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 32%)
18%
32%
18%
32%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,433, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 24%)
27%
34%
15%
24%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,479, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
33%
17%
17%
33%

3rd Grade (Spanish)

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,395
  • Males1,382
  • Females1,408
  • Hispanic1,395
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,395
State:

956
Reading students tested: 45
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 45

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.5 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 46%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

18%
46%
25%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,382, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 59%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 5%)
18%
59%
18%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,408, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 17%)
17%
35%
31%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,395, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 11%)
18%
46%
25%
11%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,611
  • Males1,615
  • Females1,607
  • Hispanic1,608
  • White1,660
Math Average Scale Score:

1,611
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 91
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 91

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.3 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.4 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

11%
32%
25%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,615, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 32%)
12%
32%
24%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 32%)
10%
32%
26%
32%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,608, Tested: 83, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 31%)
12%
33%
24%
31%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,660, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 43%)
14%
43%
43%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,584
  • Males1,540
  • Females1,618
  • Hispanic1,580
  • White1,627
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,584
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 51
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 51

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.1 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 21%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 41%

14%
21%
24%
41%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,540, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 32%)
23%
22%
23%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,618, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 48%)
7%
21%
24%
48%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,580, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 42%)
14%
21%
23%
42%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 43%)
14%
15%
28%
43%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,898
  • Males3,665
  • Females4,075
  • Hispanic3,867
  • White4,170
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,898
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 51
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 51

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.7 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.3 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

25%
24%
35%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,665, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 0%)
32%
41%
27%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,075, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 28%)
21%
10%
41%
28%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,867, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 14%)
26%
25%
35%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,170, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 29%)
14%
15%
42%
29%

4th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,547
  • Males1,544
  • Females1,550
  • Hispanic1,547
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,547
State:

815
Reading students tested: 41
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 41

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.9 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

20%
29%
19%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,544, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 37%)
26%
16%
21%
37%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,550, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 27%)
14%
41%
18%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,547, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 32%)
20%
29%
19%
32%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All4,208
  • Males4,096
  • Females4,310
  • Hispanic4,208
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,208
Texas:

2,017
Writing students tested: 40
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 40

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.3 (83%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

13%
25%
30%
33%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,096, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 37%)
21%
21%
21%
37%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,310, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 29%)
5%
28%
38%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,208, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 33%)
13%
25%
30%
33%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,631
  • Males1,630
  • Females1,631
  • Hispanic1,623
  • Black1,733
  • White1,623
Math Average Scale Score:

1,631
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 78
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 78

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.6 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

12%
29%
35%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,630, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 25%)
14%
20%
41%
25%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,631, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 24%)
9%
41%
26%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,623, Tested: 67, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 22%)
12%
31%
35%
22%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,733, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 60%)
40%
60%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,623, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
20%
40%
20%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,581
  • Males1,579
  • Females1,584
  • Hispanic1,575
  • Black1,700
  • White1,530
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,581
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 78
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 78

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.6 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

17%
29%
32%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,579, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 23%)
18%
25%
34%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,584, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 21%)
15%
35%
29%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,575, Tested: 67, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 21%)
16%
32%
31%
21%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,700, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 40%)
60%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,530, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,005
  • Males4,085
  • Females3,904
  • Hispanic3,975
  • Black4,273
  • White3,996
Science Average Scale Score:

4,005
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 77
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 78

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.9 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 39%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

8%
34%
39%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,085, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 28%)
7%
26%
39%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,904, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 9%)
9%
44%
38%
9%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,975, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 17%)
9%
33%
41%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,273, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 40%)
60%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,996, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 80%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
80%
20%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic22
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White2
  • LEP4
  • IDEA13
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 28 (male: 23, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 22 (male: 17, female: 5)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Farmers Branch Elementary School:

50.3
Texas:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic4
  • Black2
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2


Expulsions:
Show data for

(State average from 1,623 schools)

Expulsion with educational services refers to an action taken by the local educational agency of removing a child from his/her regular school for disciplinary purposes, and providing educational services to the child (e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring; transfer to an alternative school) for the remainder of the school year (or longer) in accordance with local educational agency policy. Expulsion with educational services also includes removals resulting from violations of the Gun Free Schools Act that are modified to less than 365 days.
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2

Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services per 1,000 students
Farmers Branch Elementary School:

3.6
Texas:

26.6

Students with Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services per 1,000 students
School:

3.6
Texas:

10.5

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Farmers Branch, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents