Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Farmersville Int School in Farmersville, TX
(02-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 73
Address
 807 N MAIN
Farmersville, TX 75442
Telephone
(972) 782-8108
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
73
Students
500
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
33.4
Free lunch eligible students
263
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
25
School district
FARMERSVILLE ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
BLAND MIDDLE (7.4 miles):

85
BLAND EL (7.4 miles):

78
Farmersville Int School:

73
FARMERSVILLE J H (1.4 miles):

71
BLAND H S (5.6 miles):

63
FARMERSVILLE H S (1.2 miles):

61
MCCLENDON EL (6.4 miles):

61
DAVIS EL (8.1 miles):

54
LELAND E EDGE MIDDLE (6.3 miles):

43
Farmersville Int School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Collin County:

81
Farmersville:

68
Farmersville Int School:

73

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 500
Enrollment in 2015: 490
Enrollment in 2014: 469
Enrollment in 2013: 467
Enrollment in 2012: 448
Enrollment in 2011: 428
Enrollment in 2010: 428
Enrollment in 2009: 438
Enrollment in 2008: 431
Enrollment in 2007: 418
Enrollment in 2006: 235
Enrollment in 2005: 246
Enrollment in 2004: 222
Enrollment in 2003: 243
Enrollment in 2002: 222
Enrollment in 2001: 215

Farmersville Int School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradeG02G03G04G05Total
All students121125125129500
Female students60646468256
Male students61616161244
American Indian/Alaska Native students - 1113
Asian students - 1 - 12
Hispanic students50445049193
Black students2 - 147
White students68757074287
Two or More Races students143 - 8

Enrollment by grade:
2nd grade enrollment: 121
3rd grade enrollment: 125
4th grade enrollment: 125
5th grade enrollment: 129

Farmersville Int School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 256 (51.2%)
Here:

51.2%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 244 (48.8%)
Farmersville Int School:

48.8%
State:

50.1%

Farmersville Int School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 3 (0.6%)
Farmersville Int School:

0.6%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
Farmersville Int School:

0.4%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 193 (38.6%)
Here:

38.6%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 7 (1.4%)
Here:

1.4%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 287 (57.4%)
School:

57.4%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 8 (1.6%)
Farmersville Int School:

1.6%
State:

2.1%

Farmersville Int School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 288 (57.6%)
School:

57.6%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 263 (52.6%)
Here:

52.6%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 25 (5.0%)
Here:

5.0%
State:

6.2%

Farmersville Int School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 33.4

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 6
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 0.5
Number of FTE nurses: 0.5
Number of FTE psychologists: 0.1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

15.0
Texas:

15.6

Farmersville Int School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,821,232
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 31.8 (Salary Expenditures: $1,486,323)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 4.8 (Salary Expenditures: $93,176)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2.3 (Salary Expenditures: $113,231)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $128,502)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $110,750
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,313,781
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,939,998
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 5.8 (Salary Expenditures: $113,864)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $131,418)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $128,502)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $328,063

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 83 (male: 37, female: 46)
  • Hispanic: 79 (male: 35, female: 44)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 52 (male: 35, female: 17)
  • Hispanic: 17 (male: 10, female: 7)
  • White: 35 (male: 25, female: 10)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 8 (male: 4, female: 4)

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 23 (male: 10, female: 13)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 16 (male: 5, female: 11)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,844 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Farmersville Int School:

1.7%
Texas:

4.8%

Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Farmersville Int School:

1.6%
Texas:

4.3%

Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 4th grade students retained
School:

3.2%
Texas:

3.5%

Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
Farmersville Int School:

1.6%
Texas:

4.8%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic10
  • Asian2
  • White19
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 33 (male: 21, female: 12)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • White: 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

66.0
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,470
  • Males1,484
  • Females1,456
  • Hispanic1,440
  • Black1,372
  • White1,494
  • Multirace1,517
Math Average Scale Score:

1,470
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 101
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 102

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.4 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

21%
29%
31%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,484, Tested: 53, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 19%)
17%
25%
39%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,456, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 19%)
25%
35%
21%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,440, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
31%
26%
29%
14%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,372, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 17%)
50%
33%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,494, Tested: 53, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 21%)
11%
34%
34%
21%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,517, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 40%)
20%
20%
20%
40%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,438
  • Males1,442
  • Females1,435
  • Hispanic1,397
  • Black1,405
  • White1,464
  • Multirace1,459
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,438
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 101
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 102

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

20%
40%
18%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,442, Tested: 53, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 23%)
19%
41%
17%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,435, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 21%)
21%
39%
19%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,397, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 49%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 11%)
31%
49%
9%
11%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,405, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 66%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
17%
66%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,464, Tested: 53, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 28%)
13%
36%
23%
28%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,459, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 40%)
20%
20%
20%
40%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,572
  • Males1,570
  • Females1,575
  • Hispanic1,562
  • White1,587
Math Average Scale Score:

1,572
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 127
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 129

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.3 (82%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

11%
40%
29%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,570, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 21%)
14%
35%
30%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,575, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 19%)
7%
45%
29%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,562, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 16%)
14%
39%
31%
16%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,587, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 25%)
6%
41%
28%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,547
  • Males1,534
  • Females1,558
  • Hispanic1,536
  • White1,557
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,547
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 127
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 129

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.5 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.4 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

12%
37%
31%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,534, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 19%)
16%
37%
28%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,558, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 22%)
9%
35%
34%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,536, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 22%)
17%
42%
19%
22%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,557, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 20%)
8%
33%
39%
20%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,983
  • Males3,934
  • Females4,025
  • Hispanic3,876
  • White4,084
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,983
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 129
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 129

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.8 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.1 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 17%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 37%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

27%
17%
37%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,934, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 18%)
30%
18%
34%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,025, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 19%)
25%
16%
40%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,876, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 15%)
40%
17%
28%
15%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,084, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 22%)
15%
16%
47%
22%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,630
  • Males1,667
  • Females1,603
  • Hispanic1,628
  • White1,626
Math Average Scale Score:

1,630
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 119
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 119

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.3 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

13%
31%
32%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,667, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 36%)
10%
18%
36%
36%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,603, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 14%)
16%
39%
31%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 29%)
13%
27%
31%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,626, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 18%)
15%
33%
34%
18%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,593
  • Males1,628
  • Females1,568
  • Hispanic1,594
  • White1,586
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,593
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 119
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 119

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.5 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 25%

11%
32%
32%
25%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 34%)
4%
28%
34%
34%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 19%)
16%
35%
30%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,594, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 27%)
11%
29%
33%
27%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,586, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 23%)
12%
31%
34%
23%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,866
  • Males3,996
  • Females3,773
  • Hispanic3,820
  • White3,879
Science Average Scale Score:

3,866
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 120
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 120

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.5 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 44%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

18%
44%
29%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,996, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 20%)
8%
40%
32%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,773, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 3%)
24%
46%
27%
3%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,820, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 7%)
18%
53%
22%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,879, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 9%)
17%
38%
36%
9%

Health & Safety


Referrals and Arrests:
Show data for

(State average from 1,516 schools)

Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.

School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Here:

4.0
State:

9.3


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 17 (male: 7, female: 10)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Farmersville Int School:

34.0
State:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
School:

4.0
Texas:

6.8


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic16
  • Black2
  • White10
  • LEP10
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 28 (male: 21, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)

    Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • White2
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
  • 5042
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 6 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2
  • Two or More Races: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Farmersville, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents