Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Red Lick Middle School in Texarkana, TX
(05-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 96
Address
 3511 N F M 2148
Texarkana, TX 75503
Telephone
(903) 838-6006
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.redlickisd.com
City-data.com school rating
96
Students
204
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
14.0
Free lunch eligible students
10
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
4
School district
RED LICK ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I targeted assistance school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
MARTHA & JOSH MORRISS MATH & ENGINEERING EL (3.6 miles):

100
Red Lick Middle School:

96
RED LICK EL (0.0 miles):

91
PLEASANT GROVE INT (3.0 miles):

89
PLEASANT GROVE H S (3.7 miles):

81
HOOKS EL (4.9 miles):

79
NASH EL (2.9 miles):

68
WAKE VILLAGE EL (4.7 miles):

54
LEARY EL (2.0 miles):

45
Red Lick Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Bowie County:

58
Texarkana:

55
Red Lick Middle School:

96

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 204
Enrollment in 2015: 207
Enrollment in 2014: 201
Enrollment in 2013: 227
Enrollment in 2012: 212
Enrollment in 2011: 197
Enrollment in 2010: 169
Enrollment in 2009: 173
Enrollment in 2008: 115
Enrollment in 2007: 104
Enrollment in 2006: 112
Enrollment in 2005: 119
Enrollment in 2004: 120
Enrollment in 2003: 108
Enrollment in 2002: 117
Enrollment in 2001: 114
Enrollment in 2000: 108
Enrollment in 1999: 104

Red Lick Middle School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeG05G06G07G08Total
All students60574047204
Female students34262519104
Male students26311528100
American Indian/Alaska Native students1 - - 23
Asian students1 - - - 1
Hispanic students21 - 14
Black students - 2114
White students54513842185
Two or More Races students23117

Enrollment by grade:
5th grade enrollment: 60
6th grade enrollment: 57
7th grade enrollment: 40
8th grade enrollment: 47

Red Lick Middle School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 104 (51.0%)
Red Lick Middle School:

51.0%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 100 (49.0%)
Here:

49.0%
Texas:

50.1%

Red Lick Middle School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 3 (1.5%)
School:

1.5%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 1 (0.5%)
Here:

0.5%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 4 (2.0%)
Here:

2.0%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 4 (2.0%)
School:

2.0%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 185 (90.7%)
Red Lick Middle School:

90.7%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 7 (3.4%)
School:

3.4%
State:

2.1%

Red Lick Middle School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 14 (6.9%)
Red Lick Middle School:

6.9%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 10 (4.9%)
School:

4.9%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 4 (2.0%)
Red Lick Middle School:

2.0%
State:

6.2%

Red Lick Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 14

Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

14.6
State:

15.6

Red Lick Middle School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $19
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 15 (Salary Expenditures: $642,575)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $16,008)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $53,989)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $71,349)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $276,500
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $659,518
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $642,575
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $32,951)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $53,989)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $71,349)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $314,234

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • White: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic2
  • White19
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 23 (male: 10, female: 13)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 704 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 6th grade students retained
Red Lick Middle School:

3.5%
Texas:

6.3%

    Total number of students retained in 8th grade

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • LEP2
  • 5042
Total number of students retained in 8th grade: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 8th grade students retained
Red Lick Middle School:

8.5%
State:

7.0%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 39 (male: 19, female: 20)
  • White: 37 (male: 17, female: 20)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Red Lick Middle School:

191.2
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,265 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)

    Algebra I Average Scale Score

  • All5,028
  • Males5,024
  • Females5,034
  • White5,028
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

5,028
State:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 15
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 15

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 10.3 (94%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.2 (93%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.7 (91%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.9 (90%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 5.6 (93%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 0%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 100%

100%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 5,024, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 5,034, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
White: (Average Scale Score: 5,028, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,683
  • Males1,687
  • Females1,677
  • White1,686
Math Average Scale Score:

1,683
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 55
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 55

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.9 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.9 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 40%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 38%

4%
18%
40%
38%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,687, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 42%)
6%
15%
37%
42%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,677, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 32%)
23%
45%
32%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,686, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 39%)
4%
18%
39%
39%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,623
  • Males1,628
  • Females1,614
  • White1,622
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,623
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 55
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 55

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.7 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.5 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 40%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

5%
24%
40%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 30%)
6%
21%
43%
30%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,614, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 32%)
5%
27%
36%
32%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 33%)
6%
25%
36%
33%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,970
  • Males3,979
  • Females3,958
  • White3,977
Science Average Scale Score:

3,970
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 55
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 55

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.5 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.9 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

11%
36%
38%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,979, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 15%)
12%
30%
43%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,958, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 14%)
9%
46%
31%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,977, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 16%)
10%
37%
37%
16%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,703
  • Males1,705
  • Females1,701
  • White1,702
Math Average Scale Score:

1,703
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 57
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 57

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.7 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.8 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.7 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 43%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 25%

5%
27%
43%
25%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,705, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 51%, Masters: 23%)
6%
20%
51%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,701, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 27%)
4%
34%
35%
27%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,702, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 25%)
6%
27%
42%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,610
  • Males1,602
  • Females1,619
  • White1,607
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,610
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 57
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 57

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.9 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

19%
37%
23%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,602, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 19%)
19%
46%
16%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,619, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 23%)
19%
27%
31%
23%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 21%)
21%
33%
25%
21%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,782
  • Males1,784
  • Females1,782
  • White1,780
Math Average Scale Score:

1,782
State:

1,571
Math students tested: 59
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 59

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.5 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.1 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 14%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 47%

10%
14%
29%
47%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,784, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 58%)
15%
4%
23%
58%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,782, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 39%)
6%
21%
34%
39%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,780, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 45%)
9%
15%
31%
45%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,721
  • Males1,699
  • Females1,739
  • White1,722
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,721
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 59
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 59

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.1 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 14%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 51%

10%
14%
25%
51%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,699, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 42%)
12%
11%
35%
42%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,739, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 58%)
9%
15%
18%
58%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,722, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 51%)
9%
15%
25%
51%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All4,615
  • Males4,435
  • Females4,756
  • White4,599
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,615
State:

3,515
Writing students tested: 59
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 59

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 10.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 15 (88%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 9%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 59%

5%
9%
27%
59%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,435, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 50%)
12%
11%
27%
50%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,756, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 67%)
6%
27%
67%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,599, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 58%)
5%
10%
27%
58%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,749
  • Males1,753
  • Females1,746
  • White1,739
Math Average Scale Score:

1,749
Texas:

1,539
Math students tested: 31
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 46

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.9 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.7 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.7 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 58%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

10%
19%
58%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,753, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 64%, Masters: 7%)
29%
64%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,746, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 53%, Masters: 18%)
18%
11%
53%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,739, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 57%, Masters: 11%)
11%
21%
57%
11%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,772
  • Males1,771
  • Females1,772
  • White1,773
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,772
State:

1,561
Reading students tested: 46
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 46

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.7 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 15.8 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.2 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 17%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 41%

9%
17%
33%
41%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,771, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 32%)
5%
22%
41%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,772, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 50%)
13%
13%
25%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,773, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 42%)
9%
19%
30%
42%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All4,483
  • Males4,554
  • Females4,417
  • White4,473
Science Average Scale Score:

4,483
Texas:

3,634
Science students tested: 46
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 46

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.5 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.3 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.2 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.8 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 57%

4%
18%
21%
57%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,554, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 55%)
5%
18%
22%
55%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,417, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 58%)
4%
17%
21%
58%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,473, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 53%)
5%
18%
24%
53%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All4,411
  • Males4,508
  • Females4,323
  • White4,394
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

4,411
Texas:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 46
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 46

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 13.5 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.2 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.8 (83%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 11%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 59%

9%
11%
21%
59%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,508, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 64%)
5%
13%
18%
64%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,323, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 54%)
13%
9%
25%
54%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,394, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 56%)
9%
12%
23%
56%

Health & Safety


Corporal Punishment:
Show data for
This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Instances of corporal punishment (Students with disabilities): 1

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 1 (all male)
  • White: 1
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 14 (male: 12, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 8 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,291 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 15 (male: 10, female: 5)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • White: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Here:

73.3%
State:

87.0%

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Texarkana, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Texarkana main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Red Lick Middle School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents