James B. Sanderlin Elementary School in St Petersburg, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 26.

2350 22ND AVE S
St Petersburg, FL 33712

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Ptec - St Petersburg School (1.3 miles):

98
Gorrie Elementary School (18.0 miles):

71
Robert H. Prine Elementary School (19.7 miles):

58
Bradenton Charter School (19.4 miles):

49
Corr Elementary School (18.4 miles):

37
Dickenson Elementary School (17.7 miles):

30
James B. Sanderlin Elementary School:

26
Melrose Elementary School (0.8 miles):

20
James B. Sanderlin Elementary School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
St Petersburg:

45
James B. Sanderlin Elementary:

26

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 552-1700 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 3761
School type: Elementary
District Name: PINELLAS
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 522-1701
Principal: Denise Miller
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 55
Senate District: 18
School Web Address: http://www.sanderlin-es.pinellas.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

42%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

486
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

78%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

76%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 231 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 218
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 168

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 169
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

29%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

56%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

484
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

76%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 242 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 243 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 230

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 231
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 156 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 182 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 173

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

64%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

37%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

58%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

71%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

492
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

77%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 243 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 242 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 228
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 229
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 224
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 177 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 862 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

71%
State average from 862 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

32%
State average from 862 schools:

43%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

50%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 862 schools:

68%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

468
State average from 862 schools:

539
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 862 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

69%
State average from 865 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

62%
State average from 865 schools:

56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 234 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 235 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 225
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 226
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 162 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 848 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 848 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

56%
State average from 848 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

50%
State average from 848 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 848 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 848 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

350
State average from 848 schools:

413
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 848 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

70%
State average from 848 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 848 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 267 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 268 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 93
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 243
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 244
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 34

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 90
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 91
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 47

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 116
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 116
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 182 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 65

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 166
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 167
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 61
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 61
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

62%
State average from 834 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

42%
State average from 834 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

75%
State average from 834 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

57%
State average from 834 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 834 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

41%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

337
State average from 834 schools:

412
Percent Tested
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

99%
State average from 834 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Minority Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 832 schools:

54%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1288
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1486
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1520
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

20%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

44%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

296
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

39%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

24%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

37%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1343
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

56%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

1439
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1579
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1196
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1478
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1517
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

280
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1282
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1435
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

295
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1531
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 81
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

1331
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1429
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1564
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

1369
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

315
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

1383
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1571
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

100
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

630
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

59
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

75
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

56
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

66
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

665
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 77
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

262
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 34%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 62%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1253
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1512
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1523
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1347
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 177

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1522
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1529
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1405
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 124

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

279
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1237
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1442
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1457
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1379
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 78

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1605
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1618
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

1435
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 183

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale Score
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

617
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 47
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 66
Mean Scale Score
JAMES B. SANDERLIN ELEMENTARY:

635
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 55
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 79
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale Score
Here:

616
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 55
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 65
Mean Scale Score
Here:

638
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 79
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 68
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

267
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 35%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 62%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 40%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. St Petersburg, FL
  5. James B. Sanderlin Elementary School in St Petersburg, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.