Lee County Alc Central Middle School in Fort Myers, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 2.

3650-4 MICHIGAN AVE
Fort Myers, FL 33916

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Caloosa Middle School (6.7 miles):

72
Riverdale High School (7.9 miles):

62
Cape Coral Charter School (8.7 miles):

53
Excelsior Middle Academy Of Lee County School (1.9 miles):

50
Paul Laurence Dunbar Middle School (3.6 miles):

35
Alva Middle School (14.6 miles):

26
Lee Charter Of Excellence School (0.9 miles):

7
Lee County Alc Central Middle School:

2
James Stephens Academy School (0.6 miles):

0
Lee County Alc Central Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Lee County:

49
Fort Myers:

44
Lee County Alc Central Middle:

2

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (239) 334-6200 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 36
School number: 552
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: LEE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 334-3250
Principal: Edwin Carter
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 3 in Need of Improvement
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 14
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 73
Senate District: 37
School Web Address: www.leeschools.net/schools/alcc

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26 (87%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (81%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (83%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (81%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (81%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (83%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (86%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (86%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (80%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

1382
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

48%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

34%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

18%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1515
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

51%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

23%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

1581
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

67%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

74%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

7%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1389
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

79%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

2%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

1510
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

70%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1684
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

49%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

21%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

1%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

23%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1331
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1484
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1645
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1341
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1557
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1716
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 62
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 60%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1347
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1503
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1680
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

242
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1318
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

227
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1582
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1718
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

24
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

628
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

24
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

46
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

649
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

37
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

49
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

655
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

33
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

10
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 56
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

229
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 7%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 61%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1449
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 47%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1434
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1353
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 81

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1500
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 39%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1532
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1434
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 97

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1585
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 36%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1600
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1563
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 37

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

247
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1314
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

226
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 50%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1303
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1516
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -213

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1507
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 39%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

1514
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1389
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 125

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1652
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 33%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1607
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1627
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -20

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 39
Mean Scale Score
Here:

642
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 37
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 39
Mean Scale Score
LEE COUNTY ALC CENTRAL MIDDLE:

648
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 36
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 43
Mean Scale Score
Here:

659
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 39
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 40
Mean Scale Score
Here:

641
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 36
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 43
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 38
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 46
Mean Scale Score
Here:

667
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 39
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 62
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

220
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 13%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 55%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 34%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Fort Myers, FL
  5. Lee County Alc Central Middle School in Fort Myers, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.