City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
83.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Leewood K-8 Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Miami-Dade County: | 45 |
Miami: | 44 |
Leewood K-8 Center School: | 83 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (305) 233-7430 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 2881
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: DADE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 256-3104
Principal: Bart D Christie
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 21
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 114
Senate District: 38
School Web Address: http://leewood.dadeschools.net
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 91% |
State average from 54 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 88% |
State average from 54 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 86% |
State average from 54 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 79% |
State average from 54 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 79% |
State average from 54 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 68% |
State average from 53 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 76% |
State average from 54 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 74% |
State average from 54 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 641 |
State average from 54 schools: | 539 |
Percent TestedLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 100% |
State average from 53 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 19% |
State average from 54 schools: | 60% |
Minority RateHere: | 74% |
State average from 54 schools: | 57% |
Region: 5
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 402 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 402 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 395
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 395
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 240 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 226
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 226
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 90% |
State average from 53 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 89% |
State average from 52 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 94% |
State average from 53 schools: | 89% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 72% |
State average from 53 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 73% |
State average from 52 schools: | 69% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 71% |
State average from 53 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 67% |
State average from 52 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 55% |
State average from 52 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 611 |
State average from 52 schools: | 566 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 52 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 15% |
State average from 52 schools: | 55% |
Minority RateHere: | 67% |
State average from 53 schools: | 52% |
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 360 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 360 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 353
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 353
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 92% |
State average from 52 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 90% |
State average from 52 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 94% |
State average from 52 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 62% |
State average from 51 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 82% |
State average from 51 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 75% |
State average from 51 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 83% |
State average from 51 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 67% |
State average from 51 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 645 |
State average from 51 schools: | 545 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 51 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 14% |
State average from 52 schools: | 53% |
Minority RateHere: | 65% |
State average from 52 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 217 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 12% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 149
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (93%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 14% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 29% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 11% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 12% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 13% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 18% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 76% |
State average from 43 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 85% |
State average from 43 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 90% |
State average from 43 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 53% |
State average from 43 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 71% |
State average from 43 schools: | 65% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math GainsHere: | 70% |
State average from 43 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 61% |
State average from 43 schools: | 64% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 60% |
State average from 43 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 566 |
State average from 43 schools: | 531 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 43 schools: | 98% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 37% |
State average from 43 schools: | 50% |
Minority RateHere: | 70% |
State average from 43 schools: | 57% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 415 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 415 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 98% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 131
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 404
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 405
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 100% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 98% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 97% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 98% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 84% |
State average from 44 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 89% |
State average from 44 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 77% |
State average from 44 schools: | 84% |
Making Reading GainsLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 71% |
State average from 44 schools: | 63% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 78% |
State average from 44 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 74% |
State average from 44 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 473 |
State average from 44 schools: | 418 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 44 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 30% |
State average from 44 schools: | 51% |
Minority RateHere: | 67% |
State average from 44 schools: | 56% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 471 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 472 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 153
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 458
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 459
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 42
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 148
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 148
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 52
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 142
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 143
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 32
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 108
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 108
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 54
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 142
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 143
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 80% |
State average from 43 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 79% |
State average from 43 schools: | 65% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 91% |
State average from 43 schools: | 80% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 71% |
State average from 43 schools: | 62% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 74% |
State average from 43 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 62% |
State average from 43 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 457 |
State average from 43 schools: | 400 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 43 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 32% |
State average from 43 schools: | 52% |
Minority RateHere: | 65% |
State average from 43 schools: | 55% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1613 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 352 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 20% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 49% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 89% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 5 |
State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1758 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 350 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 5% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 5% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 41% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 19% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 90% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1785 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 334 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 10% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 20% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 48% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 16% |
State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 83% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1927 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 350 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 41% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 90% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1971 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 348 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 16% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 34% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 19% |
State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 81% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 344 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 11% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 16% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 43% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 25% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 73% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1674 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 381 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 20% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 31% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 41% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 92% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1636 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 341 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 4% |
State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 10% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 39% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 32% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 14% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 86% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 5 |
State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1770 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 355 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 11% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 21% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 40% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 80% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1827 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 345 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 14% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 46% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 17% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 81% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1921 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 11% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 13% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 23% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 34% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 19% |
State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 76% |
State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1512 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1677 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1882 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 352 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1909 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 347 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 352 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1627 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 371 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1655 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1828 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 367 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1836 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 348 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 90
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1470 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 328 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1785 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 354 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1824 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 341 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1366 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 249 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1544 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 267 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1583 |
State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 246 |
State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1670 |
State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 265 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1589 |
State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 238 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 330 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 220 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 212 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1559 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 356 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1750 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 367 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1801 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 361 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1593 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 257 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1686 |
State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 267 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1751 |
State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 251 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1799 |
State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 278 |
State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 650 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Functional (max 18)LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 14 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of StudentsLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 103 |
State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 677 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 8 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 101 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 691 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18)LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 15 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 640 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Functional (max 18)LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 10 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 6 |
State average: | 8 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 648 |
State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 11 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 647 |
State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPRLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 26 |
State average: | 63 |
Functional (max 18)LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 10 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 5 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 649 |
State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Literary (max 18)LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 8 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 9 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 674 |
State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Informational (max 18)LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 10 |
State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 11 |
State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 8 |
State average: | 10 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 104
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 337 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 83%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 52
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 211 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 2%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 54%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 45
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 223 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 4%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 22%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1414 |
State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1618 |
State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 326 |
State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1626 |
State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1437 |
State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 188
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1642 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1656 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1596 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 60
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1548 |
State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 354 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1633 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 341 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1640 |
State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1511 |
State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 128
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1732 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 347 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007LEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 1741 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1668 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 73
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 143
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 639 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 134
Mean Scale ScoreLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 649 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 67
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 139
Mean Scale ScoreLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 675 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 142
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 649 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 80
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 134
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 669 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 85
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 138
Mean Scale ScoreLEEWOOD K-8 CENTER: | 677 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 82
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 133
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 317 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 71%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 88%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Miami, FL
- Leewood K-8 Center School in Miami, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: