Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School in Amarillo, TX
(05-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 94
Address
 2801 N COULTER ST
Amarillo, TX 79124
Telephone
(806) 326-3400
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://zavalaamaisd.sharpschool.com/
City-data.com school rating
94
Students
404
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
29.6
Free lunch eligible students
100
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
8
School district
AMARILLO ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Not a Title I school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
WOODLANDS EL (0.3 miles):

98
Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School:

94
BELMAR EL (3.9 miles):

84
OLSEN PARK EL (3.9 miles):

79
WILLS EL (3.3 miles):

64
HOUSTON MIDDLE (2.8 miles):

61
AVONDALE EL (3.1 miles):

49
TASCOSA H S (3.7 miles):

47
SAN JACINTO EL (2.9 miles):

35
Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Potter County:

59
Amarillo:

59
Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School:

94

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 404
Enrollment in 2015: 388
Enrollment in 2014: 398
Enrollment in 2013: 400
Enrollment in 2012: 403
Enrollment in 2011: 401
Enrollment in 2010: 373
Enrollment in 2009: 368
Enrollment in 2008: 374
Enrollment in 2007: 302
Enrollment in 2006: 201

Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeG05G06G07G08Total
All students90101102111404
Female students40485159198
Male students50535152206
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - 112
Asian students659323
Hispanic students1827232593
Black students674926
White students59596469251
Two or More Races students13149

Enrollment by grade:
5th grade enrollment: 90
6th grade enrollment: 101
7th grade enrollment: 102
8th grade enrollment: 111

Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 198 (49.0%)
School:

49.0%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 206 (51.0%)
Here:

51.0%
Texas:

50.1%

Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 2 (0.5%)
Here:

0.5%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 23 (5.7%)
Here:

5.7%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 93 (23.0%)
Here:

23.0%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 26 (6.4%)
Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School:

6.4%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 251 (62.1%)
Here:

62.1%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 9 (2.2%)
Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School:

2.2%
Texas:

2.1%

Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 108 (26.7%)
Here:

26.7%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 100 (24.8%)
Here:

24.8%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 8 (2.0%)
Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School:

2.0%
Texas:

6.2%

Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 29.6

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 2.9
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 11
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 0.3
Number of FTE nurses: 0.6

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

13.6
State:

15.6

Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,759,089
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 26.1 (Salary Expenditures: $1,376,817)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $19,215)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $152,748)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $210,308)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $129,506
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $1,951,547
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,479,603
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 4.7 (Salary Expenditures: $82,249)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4.5 (Salary Expenditures: $179,387)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $210,308)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $131,189

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian2
  • Black4
  • White2
  • IDEA2
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 12 (male: 4, female: 8)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 32 (male: 24, female: 8)
  • Hispanic: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Black: 4 (all male)
  • White: 20 (male: 16, female: 4)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 1,975 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School:

2.2%
State:

4.8%
Total number of students retained in 8th grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of 8th grade students retained
Here:

1.8%
State:

7.2%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian7
  • Black2
  • White40
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 53 (male: 33, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 40 (male: 26, female: 14)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

131.2
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,265 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)

    Algebra I Average Scale Score

  • All4,894
  • Males4,779
  • Females5,040
  • Hispanic4,643
  • White4,928
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

4,894
State:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 57
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 57

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9.3 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11 (92%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.6 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 5.6 (93%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 7%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 91%

2%
7%
91%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,779, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 84%)
3%
13%
84%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 5,040, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,643, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 90%)
10%
90%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,928, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 90%)
2%
8%
90%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,710
  • Males1,706
  • Females1,714
  • Hispanic1,651
  • Asian1,778
  • Black1,627
  • White1,721
Math Average Scale Score:

1,710
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 103
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 103

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.7 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 11%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 50%

4%
11%
35%
50%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,706, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 47%)
5%
10%
38%
47%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,714, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 54%)
2%
13%
31%
54%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,651, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 62%, Masters: 19%)
13%
7%
62%
19%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,778, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 86%)
14%
86%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
17%
33%
17%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,721, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 54%)
1%
12%
33%
54%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,634
  • Males1,627
  • Females1,641
  • Hispanic1,562
  • Asian1,725
  • Black1,537
  • White1,646
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,634
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 103
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 103

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.9 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.1 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 45%

12%
18%
25%
45%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 45%)
11%
24%
20%
45%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,641, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 44%)
13%
13%
31%
44%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,562, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
25%
25%
25%
25%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,725, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 71%)
14%
15%
71%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,537, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 17%)
33%
17%
33%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,646, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 47%)
7%
20%
26%
47%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,113
  • Males4,146
  • Females4,075
  • Hispanic3,784
  • Asian4,459
  • Black3,662
  • White4,188
Science Average Scale Score:

4,113
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 103
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 103

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.8 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.4 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.7 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.1 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 34%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

9%
30%
34%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,146, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 29%)
5%
35%
31%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,075, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 25%)
13%
25%
38%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,784, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 13%)
25%
44%
18%
13%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,459, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 57%, Masters: 43%)
57%
43%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,662, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
33%
50%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,188, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 31%)
4%
29%
36%
31%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,719
  • Males1,723
  • Females1,716
  • Hispanic1,700
  • Asian1,813
  • White1,718
  • Multirace1,731
Math Average Scale Score:

1,719
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 104
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.3 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.8 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.1 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 37%

7%
30%
26%
37%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,723, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 39%)
4%
26%
31%
39%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,716, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 34%)
9%
32%
25%
34%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,700, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 25%)
6%
38%
31%
25%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,813, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 60%)
40%
60%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,718, Tested: 74, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 39%)
8%
28%
25%
39%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,731, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,647
  • Males1,643
  • Females1,651
  • Hispanic1,591
  • Asian1,680
  • White1,662
  • Multirace1,627
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,647
Texas:

1,457
Reading students tested: 104
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.2 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.5 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

15%
33%
20%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,643, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 28%)
11%
39%
22%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,651, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 34%)
19%
28%
19%
34%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 13%)
19%
50%
18%
13%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,680, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 20%)
20%
60%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,662, Tested: 74, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 36%)
14%
31%
19%
36%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 40%)
20%
20%
20%
40%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,717
  • Males1,669
  • Females1,768
  • Hispanic1,717
  • White1,743
Math Average Scale Score:

1,717
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 51
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 104

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.8 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.4 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

10%
31%
28%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,669, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 19%)
19%
39%
23%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,768, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 44%)
24%
32%
44%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,717, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 33%)
11%
33%
23%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,743, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 37%)
7%
26%
30%
37%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,710
  • Males1,694
  • Females1,728
  • Hispanic1,655
  • Asian1,691
  • Black1,693
  • White1,740
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,710
Texas:

1,550
Reading students tested: 104
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 104

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.9 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 38%

13%
25%
24%
38%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,694, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 38%)
21%
20%
21%
38%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,728, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 38%)
4%
31%
27%
38%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,655, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 21%)
25%
33%
21%
21%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,691, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 40%)
20%
40%
40%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,693, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 17%)
17%
16%
50%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,740, Tested: 67, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 46%)
6%
22%
26%
46%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All4,163
  • Males4,041
  • Females4,307
  • Hispanic3,823
  • Asian4,157
  • Black3,980
  • White4,333
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,163
State:

3,515
Writing students tested: 104
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 104

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9.8 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 16%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 41%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

16%
16%
41%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,041, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 29%)
23%
14%
34%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,307, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 25%)
8%
17%
50%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,823, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 13%)
29%
29%
29%
13%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,157, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 20%)
20%
60%
20%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,980, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 17%)
17%
16%
50%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,333, Tested: 67, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 34%)
9%
12%
45%
34%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,819
  • Males1,838
  • Females1,797
  • Hispanic1,772
  • Asian1,881
  • Black1,839
  • White1,830
Math Average Scale Score:

1,819
Texas:

1,539
Math students tested: 99
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 156

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.3 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.2 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.7 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.3 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 40%

7%
18%
35%
40%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,838, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 46%)
4%
11%
39%
46%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,797, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 34%)
11%
25%
30%
34%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,772, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 24%)
5%
33%
38%
24%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,881, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 60%)
20%
20%
60%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,839, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
17%
16%
34%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,830, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 46%)
8%
12%
34%
46%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,750
  • Males1,769
  • Females1,728
  • Hispanic1,722
  • Asian1,748
  • White1,766
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,750
State:

1,561
Reading students tested: 103
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 156

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 15.1 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.4 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 45%

11%
18%
26%
45%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,769, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 44%)
4%
22%
30%
44%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,728, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 45%)
18%
15%
22%
45%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,722, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 28%)
12%
32%
28%
28%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,748, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 40%)
20%
40%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,766, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 53%)
9%
12%
26%
53%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All4,372
  • Males4,516
  • Females4,214
  • Hispanic4,131
  • Asian4,449
  • White4,491
Science Average Scale Score:

4,372
Texas:

3,634
Science students tested: 103
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 103

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.5 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.2 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9 (82%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 10%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 51%

14%
10%
25%
51%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,516, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 56%)
7%
10%
27%
56%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,214, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 47%)
20%
13%
20%
47%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,131, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 32%)
20%
12%
36%
32%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,449, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 80%)
20%
80%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,491, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 56%)
11%
9%
24%
56%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,828
  • Males3,893
  • Females3,757
  • Hispanic3,685
  • Asian4,125
  • White3,874
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,828
Texas:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 103
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 103

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 10.8 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.9 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.7 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

26%
33%
22%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,893, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 20%)
20%
36%
24%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,757, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 18%)
33%
30%
19%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,685, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 12%)
32%
36%
20%
12%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,125, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 40%)
20%
20%
20%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,874, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 21%)
23%
33%
23%
21%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian2
  • White10
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA4
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 18 (male: 9, female: 9)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

44.6
Texas:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic13
  • Asian1
  • Black6
  • White20
  • LEP1
  • IDEA10
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 40 (male: 39, female: 1)
  • Hispanic: 13 (all male)
  • Asian: 1 (all female)
  • Black: 6 (all male)
  • White: 20 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 1 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 16

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
School:

39.6
State:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic13
  • American Indian2
  • Asian2
  • Black4
  • White22
  • Multirace2
  • LEP4
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 45 (male: 34, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 22 (male: 17, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

    Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic5
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White5
  • LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 14 (male: 12, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 5 (all male)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 5 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 6

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School:

14.9
State:

27.5
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 10 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • White: 8
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,291 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.

    8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I

  • Hispanic10
  • American Indian2
  • Asian2
  • White34
  • Multirace2
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 50 (male: 21, female: 29)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • White: 34 (male: 14, female: 20)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 40 (male: 17, female: 23)
  • Hispanic: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • White: 32 (male: 13, female: 19)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Here:

80.0%
Texas:

87.0%

Geometry:
Show data for
Geometry is a (college-preparatory) course that typically includes topics such as properties of plane and solid figures; deductive methods of reasoning and use of logic; geometry as an axiomatic system including the study of postulates, theorems, and formal proofs; concepts of congruence, similarity, parallelism, perpendicularity, and proportion; and rules of angle measurement in triangles.Geometry is considered a prerequisite for Algebra II.
8th grade students enrolled in Geometry: 2

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Amarillo, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Amarillo main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Lorenzo De Zavala Middle School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents