Pierson Elementary School in Pierson, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 30.

1 W FIRST AVE
Pierson, FL 32180

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lewis E. Wadsworth Elementary School (20.0 miles):

77
George W. Marks Elementary School (16.9 miles):

66
Louise S. Mcinnis Elementary School (10.7 miles):

47
Spring Creek Elementary School (17.7 miles):

45
Seville Public School (5.3 miles):

34
Pierson Elementary School:

30
Louise S. Mcinnis Elementary School (10.7 miles):

28
Cornerstone Elementary School (19.6 miles):

21
Hospital/Homebound School (17.4 miles):

1
Pierson Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Volusia County:

42
Pierson:

17
Pierson Elementary School:

30

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (386) 749-6850 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 64
School number: 4831
School type: Elementary
District Name: VOLUSIA
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (386) 749-6870
Principal: Richard Myers
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 3
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 21
Senate District: 7

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 734 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 734 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

67%
State average from 734 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

59%
State average from 733 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 734 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 733 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

49%
State average from 734 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 734 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

495
State average from 734 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 733 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

84%
State average from 734 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 735 schools:

46%
Region: 2

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 292 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 291 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 289
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 286

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 285
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 200 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 200 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 236 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 235 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 233
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 230

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 229
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 735 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 734 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 734 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

48%
State average from 734 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 735 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 735 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

522
State average from 734 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 734 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

84%
State average from 734 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

75%
State average from 734 schools:

45%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 270 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 270 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 257

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 257
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 180 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 176
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 176

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 176
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 176
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 224 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 224 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 212

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 212
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 711 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 711 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

66%
State average from 711 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

38%
State average from 711 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 711 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 711 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

78%
State average from 711 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 711 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

525
State average from 711 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 711 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 711 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 711 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 241 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 242 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 229

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 228
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 180
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 177

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 179
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 176
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 132
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 652 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

54%
State average from 652 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 652 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

45%
State average from 650 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 652 schools:

72%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 652 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 652 schools:

67%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 652 schools:

69%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

513
State average from 652 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 652 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

80%
State average from 655 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 655 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 242 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 242 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 238
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 238
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 171 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 196 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 196 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 643 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 643 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

73%
State average from 643 schools:

81%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 643 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 643 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 643 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

372
State average from 643 schools:

420
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 643 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

82%
State average from 644 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 644 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 225 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 60
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 218
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 215
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 64
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 64
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 41

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 149
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 182 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 50

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 176
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 173
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 132 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 35

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 129
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 126
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 47
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 46
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 631 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

72%
State average from 631 schools:

80%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 631 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 631 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

415
State average from 631 schools:

417
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 631 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

85%
State average from 631 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 631 schools:

52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1348
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

27%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

17
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1419
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

24%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1624
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

325
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

43%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1448
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1460
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

18%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1686
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

41%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1221
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1567
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1585
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

299
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1305
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1610
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1653
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 88
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1395
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1581
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1524
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1459
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1530
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1584
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

315
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

73
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

631
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

60
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

73
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

653
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

70
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

91
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

659
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

66
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 74
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

283
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 45%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1270
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1443
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

296
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1450
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1286
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 164

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1555
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1538
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1419
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 119

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1284
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1454
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1469
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1253
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 215

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1611
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1614
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1452
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 163

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 79
Mean Scale Score
PIERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

623
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 53
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 95
Mean Scale Score
Here:

635
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 55
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 64
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78
Mean Scale Score
Here:

618
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 57
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 94
Mean Scale Score
Here:

640
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 68
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 71
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 74
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 95
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

268
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 38%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 66%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 45%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Pierson, FL
  5. Pierson Elementary School in Pierson, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.