Phone: (863) 648-3031 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 1908
School type: Elementary
District Name: POLK
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 648-3033
Principal: Melody Butler
School Web Address: http://schools.polk-fl.net/slhe/
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 63% |
State average from 963 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 67% |
State average from 963 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 84% |
State average from 963 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 53% |
State average from 962 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 55% |
State average from 963 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 50% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 64% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 53% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 489 |
State average from 963 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 963 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 56% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateHere: | 41% |
State average from 963 schools: | 47% |
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 262 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 262 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 237
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 237
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 70% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 164 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 164 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1361 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 310 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 21% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 13% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 25% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 37% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 66% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 17 |
State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1453 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 298 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 22% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 30% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 24% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 22% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 47% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 17 |
State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreSPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 1596 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 18% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 21% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 24% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 61% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 10 |
State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 317 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 18% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 34% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 3% |
State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 48% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1443 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 16% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 33% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 12% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 73% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1503 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 311 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 19% |
State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 20% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 20% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 61% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1654 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 330 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 17% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 28% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 30% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 55% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12SPESSARD L HOLLAND ELEMENTARY: | 8 |
State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Bartow, FL
- Spessard L Holland Elementary School in Bartow, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: