City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
6.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Hartridge Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:| Florida: | 45 |
| Polk County: | 41 |
| Winter Haven: | 38 |
| Hartridge Academy School: | 6 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (863) 956-4434 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 8121
School type: Elementary
District Name: POLK
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 956-3267
Principal: Debra M Richards
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 65
Senate District: 17
School Web Address: http://copecenternorth.dadeschools.net/
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 733 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 72% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 72% |
| State average from 733 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 72% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 657 |
| State average from 734 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 733 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 57% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 46% |
Region: 4
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 75% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 75% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 589 |
| State average from 734 schools: | 557 |
Percent Tested| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 99% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 53% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 45% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 6% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 81% |
Making Reading Gains| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 56% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns| Here: | 301 |
| State average from 643 schools: | 420 |
Percent Tested| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 98% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: P
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: P
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 644 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 644 schools: | 54% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (96%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 38
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 37
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 3% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 80% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 60% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns| Here: | 210 |
| State average from 631 schools: | 417 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%
Grade in 2005: F
Grade in 2004: P
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 52% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1530 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 53% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 95% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1643 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 81% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 20 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1847 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 58% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 92% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 12 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1692 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 269 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 33% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1814 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 17% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 1703 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 259 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 76% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 8% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 12% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 359 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 75% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 100% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 258 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 256 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 64% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 5% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1509 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 84% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1677 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 351 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 88% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1870 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 376 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 67% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 100% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1768 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 288 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 38% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1840 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 277 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 4% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1951 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing| Here: | 72% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 52% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 1476 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1764 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 351 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 08%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 04
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1764 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 284 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1694 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 270 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1704 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 259 |
| State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 254 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 255 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1508 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 345 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 1635 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1737 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 280 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 1760 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 254 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 1905 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 10
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 5 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 25
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 4
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1615 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 352 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1698 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1794 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1811 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1645 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 248 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 268 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 1599 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 365 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1702 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 356 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1787 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 358 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 9
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1836 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 276 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1872 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 13 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 659 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Functional (max 18)| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 672 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Functional (max 18)| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 686 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Functional (max 18)| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 11 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 685 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 696 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 341 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 83%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 31
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 262 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 26%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1717 |
| State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 274 |
| State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1706 |
| State average: | 1837 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 1639 |
| State average: | 1779 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 67
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1727 |
| State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 263 |
| State average: | 291 |
Percent Passing: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 10
Percent Matched to 2006: 79%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1736 |
| State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1726 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 10
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 267 |
| State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| HARTRIDGE ACADEMY: | 1762 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 254 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1755 |
| State average: | 1869 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1688 |
| State average: | 1821 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 67
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1898 |
| State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 315 |
Percent Passing: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 71%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1916 |
| State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1825 |
| State average: | 1901 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 92
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 24
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 676 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 696 |
Median NPR: 44
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 687 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Median NPR: 45
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 24
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 683 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 708 |
Median NPR: 47
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 696 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Median NPR: 44
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 40
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 265 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 28%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 80%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Winter Haven, FL
- Hartridge Academy School in Winter Haven, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: