Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Three Way Elementary School in Stephenville, TX
(PK-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 27
Address
 247 CR 207
Stephenville, TX 76401
Telephone
(254) 965-6496
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.twisd.us
City-data.com school rating
27
Students
99
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
9.4
Free lunch eligible students
54
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
25
School district
THREE WAY ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
HICO EL (11.2 miles):

83
HOOK EL (11.9 miles):

74
HENDERSON J H (13.0 miles):

71
STEPHENVILLE H S (13.0 miles):

70
HICO H S (11.2 miles):

53
BLUFF DALE EL (13.5 miles):

53
GILBERT INT (12.8 miles):

44
HUSTON ACADEMY (10.1 miles):

32
Three Way Elementary School:

27
Three Way Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Erath County:

54
Stephenville:

55
Three Way Elementary School:

27

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 99
Enrollment in 2015: 90
Enrollment in 2014: 61
Enrollment in 2013: 53
Enrollment in 2012: 61
Enrollment in 2011: 68
Enrollment in 2010: 57
Enrollment in 2009: 43
Enrollment in 2008: 55
Enrollment in 2007: 61
Enrollment in 2006: 59
Enrollment in 2005: 61
Enrollment in 2004: 46
Enrollment in 2003: 48
Enrollment in 2002: 49
Enrollment in 2001: 42
Enrollment in 2000: 53
Enrollment in 1999: 66

Three Way Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05G06G07G08Total
All students2712659108106699
Female students1672362541349
Male students1154238365350
Hispanic students14822573103155
White students13443434 - 3543
Two or More Races students - - - - - - 1 - - - 1

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 27
Kindergarten enrollment: 12
1st grade enrollment: 6
2nd grade enrollment: 5
3rd grade enrollment: 9
4th grade enrollment: 10
5th grade enrollment: 8
6th grade enrollment: 10
7th grade enrollment: 6
8th grade enrollment: 6

Three Way Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 49 (49.5%)
Three Way Elementary School:

49.5%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 50 (50.5%)
Three Way Elementary School:

50.5%
Texas:

50.1%

Three Way Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Hispanic enrollment: 55 (55.6%)
School:

55.6%
State:

46.9%
White enrollment: 43 (43.4%)
Here:

43.4%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 1 (1.0%)
Three Way Elementary School:

1.0%
State:

2.1%

Three Way Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 79 (79.8%)
Three Way Elementary School:

79.8%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 54 (54.5%)
Here:

54.5%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 25 (25.3%)
Here:

25.3%
Texas:

6.2%

Three Way Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 9.4

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 2
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

10.5
Texas:

15.6

Three Way Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $600,670
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 9 (Salary Expenditures: $336,805)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $14,392)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $109,677)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $90,572)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $310,417

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,844 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Three Way Elementary School:

16.7%
State:

5.3%
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School:

40.0%
State:

4.8%

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

3,897
State:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 6
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 6

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.8 (44%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.2 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 4.2 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 50%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

17%
50%
16%
17%
Biology Average Scale Score:

4,012
State:

3,772
Biology students tested: 8
Biology # Answer Documents Submitted: 8

Biology Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.1 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.6 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.3 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 7.1 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 63%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

13%
25%
63%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,991, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 57%, Masters: 0%)
14%
29%
57%
English I Average Scale Score:

3,962
State:

3,637
English I students tested: 8
English I # Answer Documents Submitted: 8

English I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.1 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.8 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 6 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 6: 6.4 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 13%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 50%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

38%
13%
50%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,936, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 0%)
43%
14%
43%
3rd Grade
Math Average Scale Score:

1,446
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 7
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 7

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.3 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.4 (86%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

29%
28%
29%
14%
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,528
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 7
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 7

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.9 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 15%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 42%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

14%
15%
42%
29%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,660
  • Males1,652
  • White1,670
Math Average Scale Score:

1,660
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 11
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 11

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.4 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.3 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.1 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.5 (89%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 9%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 46%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 45%

9%
46%
45%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,652, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 38%)
12%
50%
38%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,670, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 50%)
50%
50%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,519
  • Males1,507
  • White1,568
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,519
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 11
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 11

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.8 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

36%
19%
18%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,507, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
50%
25%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 38%)
25%
12%
25%
38%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,492
  • Males3,520
  • White3,621
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,492
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 11
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 11

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3 (38%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.6 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.1 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

55%
27%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,520, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
38%
38%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,621, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
38%
38%
25%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,644
  • Males1,656
  • Hispanic1,613
  • White1,681
Math Average Scale Score:

1,644
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 11
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 11

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.9 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 64%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

27%
64%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,656, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 62%, Masters: 13%)
25%
62%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 0%)
50%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,681, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 80%, Masters: 20%)
80%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,596
  • Males1,585
  • Hispanic1,544
  • White1,658
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,596
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 11
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 11

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.3 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

18%
37%
27%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,585, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
13%
50%
25%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,544, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 17%)
33%
50%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,658, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 20%)
20%
60%
20%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,897
  • Males4,068
  • Hispanic3,753
  • White4,069
Science Average Scale Score:

3,897
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 11
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 11

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.2 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.5 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 37%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

27%
18%
37%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,068, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 25%)
13%
13%
50%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,753, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 17%)
50%
33%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,069, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,596
  • Males1,604
  • Females1,584
  • Hispanic1,549
  • White1,689
Math Average Scale Score:

1,596
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 15
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 15

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.7 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 2.3 (38%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.5 (50%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

40%
40%
13%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,604, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 11%)
44%
34%
11%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,584, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
33%
50%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,549, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
50%
30%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,689, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
20%
60%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,487
  • Males1,450
  • Females1,541
  • Hispanic1,442
  • White1,576
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,487
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 15
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 15

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.3 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (44%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 6%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

67%
20%
6%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,450, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 78%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 11%)
78%
11%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,541, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
50%
33%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,442, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 80%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
80%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
40%
20%
20%
20%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,636
  • Males1,615
  • Females1,658
  • Hispanic1,605
  • White1,636
Math Average Scale Score:

1,636
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 16
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 16

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.9 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (40%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 56%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

19%
56%
19%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,615, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 62%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
25%
62%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,658, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
13%
50%
25%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
29%
57%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,636, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 63%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
13%
63%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,667
  • Males1,607
  • Females1,728
  • Hispanic1,644
  • White1,668
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,667
Texas:

1,550
Reading students tested: 16
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 16

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.8 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.8 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 7%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

19%
43%
7%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 13%)
38%
38%
12%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,728, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 50%)
50%
50%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,644, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 29%)
29%
42%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,668, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 25%)
13%
50%
13%
25%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All4,189
  • Males3,892
  • Females4,486
  • Hispanic3,946
  • White4,321
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,189
State:

3,515
Writing students tested: 16
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 16

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 10.1 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.3 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

13%
19%
38%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,892, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 13%)
25%
25%
37%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,486, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 50%)
12%
38%
50%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,946, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 14%)
14%
29%
43%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,321, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 38%)
13%
13%
37%
38%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,575
  • Males1,544
  • Females1,606
  • Hispanic1,574
Math Average Scale Score:

1,575
State:

1,539
Math students tested: 10
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 12

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.8 (36%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6 (40%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.3 (47%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 0%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

60%
40%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,544, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 80%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
80%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,606, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
40%
60%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,574, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
56%
44%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,597
  • Males1,523
  • Females1,651
  • Hispanic1,566
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,597
State:

1,561
Reading students tested: 12
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 12

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.4 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (53%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

50%
25%
17%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,523, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 80%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
80%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,651, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
29%
28%
29%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,566, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 0%)
60%
30%
10%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,551
  • Males3,204
  • Females3,799
  • Hispanic3,413
Science Average Scale Score:

3,551
State:

3,634
Science students tested: 12
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 12

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.9 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.6 (42%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.6 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 58%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

58%
25%
9%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,204, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
60%
40%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,799, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 14%)
57%
14%
15%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,413, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 0%)
60%
30%
10%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,266
  • Males3,117
  • Females3,372
  • Hispanic3,212
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,266
State:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 12
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 12

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.8 (40%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.3 (33%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.8 (38%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (45%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 83%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 17%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 0%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

83%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,117, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 100%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
100%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,372, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 71%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
71%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,212, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 90%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
90%
10%

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Stephenville, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Stephenville main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Three Way Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents