Volusia County Superintendent's Office School in Deland, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 5.

200 N CLARA AVE
Deland, FL 32720

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Cypress Creek Elementary School (17.6 miles):

84
Timbercrest Elementary School (8.3 miles):

67
Lake Mary Elementary School (19.1 miles):

61
Wilson Elementary School (16.1 miles):

51
Spring Creek Elementary School (14.4 miles):

45
Woodward Avenue Elementary School (1.9 miles):

38
Louise S. Mcinnis Elementary School (6.9 miles):

28
Volusia County Superintendent's Office School:

5
Volusia County Superintendent's Office School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Deland:

43
This School:

5

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (386) 734-7190 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 64
School number: 9001
School type: Other
District Name: VOLUSIA
Grade range: UNASSIGNED
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (386) 734-2842
Principal: Margaret A Smith
The main educational program offered at the school: Superintendent's Office
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 7
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 26
Senate District: 20
School Web Address: http://www.volusia.k12.fl.us/

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (90%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
VOLUSIA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (79%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23 (76%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (81%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (87%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (87%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (86%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (92%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (93%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (91%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (93%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1733
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1821
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 6
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1680
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1858
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1734
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
VOLUSIA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE:

1849
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

7
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

622
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
VOLUSIA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE:

30
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
VOLUSIA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
VOLUSIA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE:

8
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
VOLUSIA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE:

6
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
VOLUSIA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
VOLUSIA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE:

8
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

7
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

6
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

217
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 42%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

259
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 18%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 55%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1718
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1703
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1640
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 62

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1737
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
VOLUSIA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE:

265
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 64%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1884
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1997
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -113

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1829
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1818
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1757
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 62

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1802
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 60%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2016
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1936
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 80

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Deland, FL
  5. Volusia County Superintendent's Office School in Deland, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.