Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to So much of the info posted in the forum becomes lost and burried, I've decided to publish some of it in easy to access blog quips. Not alot of content space in these so I hope what is here will suffice for now. 
Intelligent Design (Part III)
Posted 05-18-2009 at 11:12 AM by bluepacific
"Intelligent Design (Part III)
"Central Dogma" of Molecular Biology
DNA Molecule Structure Model's Discovery
It was Francis Crick, James D Watson & Maurice Wilkins who were the co-discoverers of the DNA Molecule Structure Model for which they received the Nobel Prize. Everyone today recognizes this Model as seen here.
"Central Doctrine"
Francis Crick is the one however who is widely known as the one "who brought us the term "central dogma" to summerize an idea that genetic information flow in cells is essentially one-way from DNA to RNA to Protein." Francis Crick - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Central Dogma of molecular biology was first enuciated by Francis Crick in 1958 and re-stated in a Nature paper published in 1970.
The central dogma of molecular biology deals with the detailed residue by residue transfer of sequential information. It states that information cannot be transfered back from protein to either protein or nucleic acid.
In other words, "once information gets into the protein, it cannot flow back to the nucleic acid." absoluteastronomy.com
Here's another illustration of how it works.
MB Homepage, Cartoon version of the Central Dogma
The importance of this find is that it refutes to stories propounded by the experts who normally like to avoid this subject and blur this explanation. Everyone of them are aware of the "Central Dogma" and accept it as FACT. But it contradicts the fairytale of the magical accident of proteins assembling themselves from Amino Acids. As we know, only the information & instructions sent out from the DNA through the RNA messengers which are coded with the information which they bring out from the nucleus to the Ribosomes to be interpreted by them for protein synthesis. The Ribosomes then grab all the free roaming Amino Acids they can capture and assemble them into proteins. Once the proteins are formed they are assembled into whatever purpose the DNA requires of it. And just like the computers hardware, they only obey and provide a function. A protein never have has it's own separate information to send back and dictate commands to the DNA. The Law says it is always the other way around.
This also creates another dilema. Which came first, the chicken or the egg. Which when translated means, was it the protein or the DNA Chemist Richard Dickerson said they developed in parrallel, but obviously no proof, just an outrageous statement made when there is no logical answer. National Geographic likewise made identical statements to those of Richard Dawkins about the intense amount of genetic information contain in any cells DNA
The big question that cannot be answered by our world's geniuses, is where does that information come from ??? Remember, information itself is not contained, enshrined or held prisoner to any physical material substrate. As an example, the information I'm typing in this blog on City-data forum through my computer is not confined to this program. You can read it and it becomes yours. It's no longer contained within the confinds of this forum profile. You can even share this information with a friend or relative, and it becomes theirs, etched in their brain cells. Still the information is free and separate. How can you attached a physical place or location to thoughts, ideas, purpose, etc. You can't really.
The one FACT all of us know is that any information always without fail comes from an intelligent source. It never comes from blind pointless indifference. And the information contained in DNA of any living organism is far more brilliant than all the intellect of every genius who has ever lived. There are still countless of things not understood. In my (Part IV) I'll show exactly where the Bible explains and refers to the amazing Hierachal of informational control and "Central dogma" of molecular biology long before it was discovered by mankind and it has nothing to do with the Genesis Creation account.
"Central Dogma" of Molecular Biology
DNA Molecule Structure Model's Discovery
It was Francis Crick, James D Watson & Maurice Wilkins who were the co-discoverers of the DNA Molecule Structure Model for which they received the Nobel Prize. Everyone today recognizes this Model as seen here.
"Central Doctrine"
Francis Crick is the one however who is widely known as the one "who brought us the term "central dogma" to summerize an idea that genetic information flow in cells is essentially one-way from DNA to RNA to Protein." Francis Crick - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Central Dogma of molecular biology was first enuciated by Francis Crick in 1958 and re-stated in a Nature paper published in 1970.
The central dogma of molecular biology deals with the detailed residue by residue transfer of sequential information. It states that information cannot be transfered back from protein to either protein or nucleic acid.
In other words, "once information gets into the protein, it cannot flow back to the nucleic acid." absoluteastronomy.com
Here's another illustration of how it works.
MB Homepage, Cartoon version of the Central Dogma
The importance of this find is that it refutes to stories propounded by the experts who normally like to avoid this subject and blur this explanation. Everyone of them are aware of the "Central Dogma" and accept it as FACT. But it contradicts the fairytale of the magical accident of proteins assembling themselves from Amino Acids. As we know, only the information & instructions sent out from the DNA through the RNA messengers which are coded with the information which they bring out from the nucleus to the Ribosomes to be interpreted by them for protein synthesis. The Ribosomes then grab all the free roaming Amino Acids they can capture and assemble them into proteins. Once the proteins are formed they are assembled into whatever purpose the DNA requires of it. And just like the computers hardware, they only obey and provide a function. A protein never have has it's own separate information to send back and dictate commands to the DNA. The Law says it is always the other way around.
This also creates another dilema. Which came first, the chicken or the egg. Which when translated means, was it the protein or the DNA Chemist Richard Dickerson said they developed in parrallel, but obviously no proof, just an outrageous statement made when there is no logical answer. National Geographic likewise made identical statements to those of Richard Dawkins about the intense amount of genetic information contain in any cells DNA
Quote:
National Geographic
"The DNA of a cell, if written out, would fill a thousand 600 page books. Each cell is a world brimming with as many two hundred trillion tiny groups of atoms called molecules . . Our 46 chromosome 'threads' linked together would measure more than six feet. Yet the nucleus that contains them is less than foru ten-thousandths of an inch in diameter."
"The DNA of a cell, if written out, would fill a thousand 600 page books. Each cell is a world brimming with as many two hundred trillion tiny groups of atoms called molecules . . Our 46 chromosome 'threads' linked together would measure more than six feet. Yet the nucleus that contains them is less than foru ten-thousandths of an inch in diameter."
The one FACT all of us know is that any information always without fail comes from an intelligent source. It never comes from blind pointless indifference. And the information contained in DNA of any living organism is far more brilliant than all the intellect of every genius who has ever lived. There are still countless of things not understood. In my (Part IV) I'll show exactly where the Bible explains and refers to the amazing Hierachal of informational control and "Central dogma" of molecular biology long before it was discovered by mankind and it has nothing to do with the Genesis Creation account.
Total Comments 0
