[MysticPhD]

Originally Posted by JustNobody

If "God" is "everything", why not just call it "everything", why the need the need of an extraneous word dubbed "God". If "God" is everything, then "God" must be both good and evil, since "everything" includes evil. "God", being "everything" must also be a lier, a thief, a murderer, a politician, a wife, a husband, a piece of dirt, gay, straight, a theist, an atheist, etc. If you say that "God" is not one of these things, then you've differentiated it from "everything", and thus it is no longer "everything" like you propose it must be. Dropping the word "God", since it is an extraneous and unnecessary word, and the corresponding religions which believe in said "God", would certainly please a lot of atheists.

You keep dodging the essential questions and positing a bunch of inanities having nothing to do with the generic issue. What differentiates God from your "Nature" and HOW was this determined SCIENTIFICALLY? Can you focus on the issue for once?