[LuminousTruth]

Cherished and Beloved Ryrge:

Though your question is sincere and in due prospect,

I believe you are seriously misjudging Hueffenhardt, I don't have a feeling he wasn't being calm. After all, his response was pretty lengthy and thoughtful. He asked you a simple

question because he believes the question you asked is too vague. After all, the God of the pantheists DOES exist and is clearly observable. Evidence for their God is truly all around

and within us, by definition. Hueff's concern for clarity aside, "evidence" means many things, and you can peruse dictionaries and scholarly (science, history, math, philosophy, etc)

standards for various meanings. In my personal opinion, evidence is that which convinces or persuades you to hold a certain believe; it should be the effects of that which is true, the

logic of that which follows, or the experiencing of that which is defined.