View Single Post
 
Old 03-06-2015, 08:41 PM
drishmael
 
Location: MPLS
752 posts, read 566,951 times
Reputation: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
"Barney Frank - Discover the Networks
[i]Starting in the early 1990s, Frank sought to stifle efforts by regulators, Congress, and the White House to place some oversight over Fannie and Freddie's risky lending practices."
Almost without exception, a member of the House wields power only when s/he is a member of the majority. Likewise, influence declines the further one sits from committee chairmanship. So Frank's perspective during the period of 1995-2007 is more or less irrelevant; he was incapable of accomplishing anything without the Republican majority. As late as 1998, Frank was only the fifth-ranking Democrat on the Banking and Financial Services Committee, so it's reasonable to dismiss his influence prior to 1995 as well. Which leaves 2007-08 as the of era of his onerous meddling.

Unfortunately, the vast majority of the loans that went delinquent during the Financial Crisis were subprime and Alt-A (figure 1.), and purchases of those loans peaked in 2005-06 (figure 2.). Moreover, a relatively scant proportion of the troubled loans were actually backed by the GSEs (Fannie & Freddie)(figure 2.). So give poor Barney a break -- vast though his sins may be, your theory has no basis in reality.

1. Click image for larger version

Name:	figure 1..JPG
Views:	191
Size:	48.6 KB
ID:	145921

2. Click image for larger version

Name:	figure 2..JPG
Views:	191
Size:	45.4 KB
ID:	145922

Source: Financial Crisis Inquiry Report.
Reply With Quote

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top