That's not what you said. You said "in spite of" as though it were some hindrance to scientific thought.
Now you're backpeddling and calling it irrelevant.
C.S. Lewis writes on the origin of scientific method as a result of religious thinking.
Quote:
|
Men became scientific because they expected Law in Nature, and they expected Law in Nature because they believed in a Legislator. In most modern scientists this belief has died: it will be interesting to see how long their confidence in uniformity survives it. Two significant developments have already appeared—the hypothesis of a lawless sub-nature, and the surrender of the claim that science is true. We may be living nearer than we suppose to the end of the Scientific Age.
|
He has no idea how true he was. By 2018 we should have had flying cars and stuff. Now we have kids eating Tide.
I want to show you this table. And you can believe or make of it what you will.
(Source:
https://biologos.org/blogs/deborah-h...eir-worldviews)
This is why I am both religious and a believer in science. Because there is no actual conflict, only a perceived one.