|

10-17-2009, 02:19 PM
|
|
Moderator
Status:
"It's chilly"
(set 10 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rio Rancho, New Mexico USA
2,530 posts, read 925,047 times
Reputation: 1335
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana
How is the # decided? Do you get 3 b/c you are a mod? (Not that this is a big problem for me, but it has occasionally come up when I am reporting something nasty that was sent to me.)
|
I imagine a Senior Moderator set the number of posts allowed. That is just a guess on my part.
Rich
|
|

10-17-2009, 06:15 PM
|
|
rotaredoM
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where Five Miles joins the Tongue, Wy
6,254 posts, read 4,436,694 times
Reputation: 2174
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana
How is the # decided? Do you get 3 b/c you are a mod? (Not that this is a big problem for me, but it has occasionally come up when I am reporting something nasty that was sent to me.)
|
If the nasty message is in a DM, send it to the mod for the area that you usually post in.
If the nasty message is a post, report the post. The report will go to all the mods that handle that area.
|
|

10-18-2009, 09:20 PM
|
|
Sarasota/Bradenton, FL Expert Since 1997
Status:
"JESUS is the reason for the season!"
(set 15 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Florida- SRQ
20,587 posts, read 1,526,985 times
Reputation: 12243
|
|
|
It would be nice if we could DM more than 1 person at a time... but that's just me.
|
|

10-19-2009, 09:40 PM
|
|
Falls Angel
Status:
"Just hangin' out."
(set 22 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Intermountain West
23,556 posts, read 13,452,311 times
Reputation: 3656
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElkHunter
If the nasty message is in a DM, send it to the mod for the area that you usually post in.
If the nasty message is a post, report the post. The report will go to all the mods that handle that area.
|
Thanks. I'll keep that in mind. Hasn't happened lately.
|
|

10-23-2009, 04:05 AM
|
|
There's beauty in the solace of not giving a damn.
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
16,443 posts, read 13,074,132 times
Reputation: 4758
|
|
|
I understand the spam-containment policy behind the one-at-a-time restriction, but is there a way to increase it to a few at a time once a person reaches a certain post threshold by which time it's pretty safe to assume they're not a spammer? Say, 200 posts, or maybe even 500?
|
|

10-26-2009, 07:56 PM
|
|
Sarasota/Bradenton, FL Expert Since 1997
Status:
"JESUS is the reason for the season!"
(set 15 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Florida- SRQ
20,587 posts, read 1,526,985 times
Reputation: 12243
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover
I understand the spam-containment policy behind the one-at-a-time restriction, but is there a way to increase it to a few at a time once a person reaches a certain post threshold by which time it's pretty safe to assume they're not a spammer? Say, 200 posts, or maybe even 500?
|
There is a way to increase how many people you can send a DM too, as moderators are able to send DM's to more than 1 person. I like we should be able to send DM's to more than one person at a time. I, too, understand the spammer restriction, and understand. However, as Drover said, by a certain number of posts, we know that the poster is not a spammer. Maybe the Admin will consider letting us DM to more than one person after both a certain amount of posts and a certain amount of reputation points. That's similar to the policy on the "Custom User Title", where you must have 100 or 200 posts, and 50 or maybe 100 reputation points. I think that would work, or at least do a test run. There's my 2 cents.
|
|

10-26-2009, 10:04 PM
|
|
There's beauty in the solace of not giving a damn.
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
16,443 posts, read 13,074,132 times
Reputation: 4758
|
|
|
That's what I'm getting at -- is it possible to vary the allowance based on number of posts, such as once you reach 200 posts you can send to 3 people, once you reach 500 posts you can send to 5 people, etc.?
|
|

10-26-2009, 10:24 PM
|
|
TANSTAAFL!
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SoCal desert
1,485 posts, read 386,743 times
Reputation: 1595
|
|
Um, if you want to have a conversation with 5 different people, start a thread on a forum 
|
|

10-27-2009, 12:40 PM
|
|
Living in Exile
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: WV and Eastport, ME
1,302 posts, read 631,284 times
Reputation: 873
|
|
|
There have been a very few times that it would have been handy to send a DM to more than one person at a time, especially with the 60 second wait. If people over 500 posts or reps could send a DM to 3 people. that would add a little convenience with almost no risk of spam.
|
|

10-27-2009, 03:59 PM
|
|
There's beauty in the solace of not giving a damn.
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
16,443 posts, read 13,074,132 times
Reputation: 4758
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mensaguy
There have been a very few times that it would have been handy to send a DM to more than one person at a time, especially with the 60 second wait. If people over 500 posts or reps could send a DM to 3 people. that would add a little convenience with almost no risk of spam.
|
The specific instance I can think of is trying to directly contact more than one mod at a time when there is something posted in a forum that needs to be taken down immediately rather than waiting for a mod to get to it through the reporting system. I've had a number of instances where I had to DM one, wait 60 seconds, DM another, wait 60 seconds, DM another, wait 60 seconds, etc.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|