Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting > Adoption
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-25-2018, 08:22 PM
 
322 posts, read 317,612 times
Reputation: 443

Advertisements

Quote:
Orphanage Donations: On December 7, 2017, at the request of the Ministry of Civil Affairs, CCCWA issued a public notice on orphanage donations by adoptive parents. The notice explained that adoptive parents may offer a voluntary donation to the child welfare institution after the adoption registration is finalized. It has been clarified that the amount and method of submitting a voluntary donation should be left to the adoptive parents, and donations should not be made until after the adoption is registered in the province. Per the notice, CCCWA may take action against any ASP in which it believes the agency, or its representatives, have pressured families to make donations. In response to inquiries about what to do if an orphanage pressures a family to make a donation, adoptive parents and/or the ASP should report this to the local Department of Civil Affairs in the province.

https://travel.state.gov/content/tra...-delegati.html
Isn't a mandatory orphanage donations a bribe? China seems to have numerous questionable adoption practices. I wonder what happens next?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-26-2018, 08:24 AM
 
Location: East Coast
4,249 posts, read 3,724,745 times
Reputation: 6487
Interesting. This must be an attempt by the government to address the corruption that was found in their adoption system. I always had mixed feelings about the "mandatory donations." In general, though foreign adoptions from China have been decreasing. Hopefully the government is serious about addressing some of the most egregious actions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2018, 02:50 PM
 
322 posts, read 317,612 times
Reputation: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagoliz View Post
Interesting. This must be an attempt by the government to address the corruption that was found in their adoption system. I always had mixed feelings about the "mandatory donations." In general, though foreign adoptions from China have been decreasing. Hopefully the government is serious about addressing some of the most egregious actions.
There have been numerous examples of corruption that have shut down other countries international adoption programs. China's program seems to be immune to Hague shutdown for some reasons. More than six orphanage have been involved in the buying and selling of children and now this questionable practice, but still have not suspended China as they did for Cambodia, Vietnam, Congo, etc.

https://www.breakingnews.ie/world/ch...am-246497.html

A family in China made babies their business - latimes

Some Chinese parents say their babies were stolen for adoption - latimes

It's just odd that China continues to have a strong international program with the US given the number of incidents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2018, 06:41 PM
 
Location: East Coast
4,249 posts, read 3,724,745 times
Reputation: 6487
They're "immune" because they're technically Hague compliant. The Hague treaty was a UNICEF backed attempt to stop adoptions, with some vague notions of stopping corruption. But the changes caused by the treaty really didn't do much to stop the corruption that happened in various countries.

I'm sure much of the reason that we haven't seen shutdowns of Chinese adoptions has most to do with the fact that China is a much more powerful country than is Vietnam, Cambodia, or any of the others. China also has a strong and stable government (noting that strong and stable does not mean they are good or ethical or do what is truly in the best interests of the people, but merely that it is indeed strong and stable and therefore has much more clout on the world stage.)

The adoption fees did indeed create perverse financial incentives for certain people, and in the end, it is not surprising that led to corruption.

The program is not as large as it used to be, and the number of adoptions fall each year. Currently, most people adopting from China adopt so-called special needs children. There are not nearly the same number of of healthy babies available (and that is, in most aspects, a good thing).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2018, 10:10 AM
 
836 posts, read 774,372 times
Reputation: 1775
We were always very happy to donate to our Russian baby homes. It was the least we could do for all the wonderful children we couldn't adopt ourselves .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2018, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Howard County, Maryland
16,556 posts, read 10,630,149 times
Reputation: 36573
Quote:
Originally Posted by xy340 View Post
There have been numerous examples of corruption that have shut down other countries international adoption programs. China's program seems to be immune to Hague shutdown for some reasons. More than six orphanage have been involved in the buying and selling of children and now this questionable practice, but still have not suspended China as they did for Cambodia, Vietnam, Congo, etc.

Your original post described how this "questionable practice" is now expressly forbidden by the Chinese government. Why would we suspend China for taking a proactive step in reducing corruption?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2018, 02:13 PM
 
322 posts, read 317,612 times
Reputation: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by bus man View Post
Your original post described how this "questionable practice" is now expressly forbidden by the Chinese government. Why would we suspend China for taking a proactive step in reducing corruption?
Many international countries have been suspended for the activities listed in the articles above that occurred in China. There have been documented cases which have ended in indictments and convictions. These convictions clearly document that various orphanage directors using adoption donations to purchase infants from various sources. Also, the Hague, an international body that determines international adoption regulations, did rule that these forced donations seems to be a payment for the infant and this violates several tenants of the Hague treaty. So it appears that instead of ruling China was not in compliance with the Hague treat, they simply changed their policy to prevent a ruling of non-compliance.

So why the different standard applied to China?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2018, 10:24 AM
 
1,065 posts, read 597,897 times
Reputation: 1462
Quote:
Originally Posted by xy340 View Post
Isn't a mandatory orphanage donations a bribe? China seems to have numerous questionable adoption practices. I wonder what happens next?
Please go back and read that article, again. Please.

Last edited by Middletwin; 06-03-2018 at 10:26 AM.. Reason: Article
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2018, 10:52 AM
 
Location: East Coast
4,249 posts, read 3,724,745 times
Reputation: 6487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shark01 View Post
We were always very happy to donate to our Russian baby homes. It was the least we could do for all the wonderful children we couldn't adopt ourselves .
Yes, that is the theoretical justification. But it subsequently became clear that this money was incentivizing orphanage directors to do things like kidnapping babies, or going out to find more babies to adopt out when they were running low. Babies that were being hidden for being over quota but being cared for by their families were taken by authorities when in other areas without orphanages that got this kind of money would look the other way would be taken and adopted out. Or sometimes even babies that were not over quota but were somehow otherwise desirable would be seized by authorities. Some really heartbreaking and horrendous things went on, which is what happens when large sums of money are dangled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting > Adoption

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top