U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Africa
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
View Poll Results: South Africa, more Dutch or British?
More Dutch influence 20 40.82%
More British influence 29 59.18%
Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Old 04-29-2013, 01:39 PM
Status: "Dirty South to the Midwest to the East Coast" (set 13 days ago)
 
116 posts, read 93,720 times
Reputation: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by DBCC View Post
Influences in South Africa:

1652 - 1906 - The Dutch, the French Huguenots, the British pioneers and Pirates like Cecil John Rhodes

1906 to 1961 - the Brits,- stealing and manipulating their financial interests, creating racial segregation

From 1961 to Mandela - the Afrikaners (Dutch descendants) (The Brits clandestinely took advantage of this situation and tolerated the South African Givernment until they could while away (in tax free havens) their ill gotten investments, minerals, manufacturing plants etc

From Mandela to Mbeki - The people of South Africa, the Rainbow Nation envisaged by Madiba prospered, jopbs were created, multinationals invested, productivity was at an all time high

From Mbeki to present (Zuma) Just another declining and corrupt African nation whose power is in the hands of the Xhosa and will do anything to keep that power....Corruption, crime, reverse racism, unemployment, violence, and cutting off their own hands (that feed them.)
Of course, the Afrikaners have done no wrong. Only the Anglos and the Blacks have done wrong. You are so off the rocker it's absurd.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-29-2013, 04:50 PM
 
1,871 posts, read 1,577,374 times
Reputation: 404
The Republic of South Africa is much British more influenced. Although White Afrikaners speak a language that's closer to Flemish, Dutch and German with some strong Calvisnistic beliefs. The culture over-all is derived from the British colonists, this is even reflected in the sports, a South African won't have a problem adjusting to life in the British Isles or in Australia/New Zealand in comparison to that in the Netherlands/Belgium. Even Apartheid was an invention of the British colonialists before the Afrikaners/Boere people adpoted it as their national policy in order to keep the Black population from rising over them. Apartheid was practised in the Cape Colony well before 1949! Afrikaners are a mixture of Dutch, French,German,Scandinavian with minor admixtures of British Isles, Portugal, Spanish. However many people forget that some have a distant ancestry with Hottentots(Southern African aboriginals).
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2013, 09:41 PM
 
3 posts, read 2,132 times
Reputation: 22
Oh my God: Flemish IS NO LANGUAGE!! It is a light accent of the Dutch language, spoken in Belgium. To say that Afrikaans has more in common with Flemish than the "accent-less" standard Dutch is absolute *******s. Furthermore, it is more than obvious that South-Africa is way more influenced by the Dutch.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2013, 06:54 AM
 
2,643 posts, read 891,230 times
Reputation: 1855
You know I'd think if one could take a look at the extent particularly to how much of SA's judicial elements are made up in terms of Dutch or Brit background it could help identify 'influence. 'Laws' of the land and how they are drawn up signify and point to the way a population behaves in a cultural milieu. Add religious, tribal, racial preferences and you have a mix that can either foster harmony or set up divison within that society.

It's unfortunate that the British in the late 19th were like bulls in a china shop when they came to SA. Frankly, it just gave the original inhabitants of SA more reasons to blame somebody else for problems that possibly could have even existed without them, i.e. tribal warfare within and between peoples, etc. I know SA has moved on from the colonial experiences of the sad 19th. The wounds may have ostensibly healed but the betrayals no doubt exist deep in the SA cultural psyche.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2013, 09:11 AM
 
520 posts, read 309,287 times
Reputation: 863
Probably the Dutch, up until the British concentration camps.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $84,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Africa

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top