U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Africa
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-20-2015, 12:19 PM
 
3,528 posts, read 2,525,132 times
Reputation: 6828

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tcave360 View Post
Not as fabricated as some of the identities of the mummies you Caucasoids have created

I'll touch on King Tut's mummy and identity in a bit but let's take a look at the supposed mummy of Pharaoh Rameses II.

This is just one example of Caucasians producing photos of Rameses II's mummy as "evidence" that the Kemetians were not Blacks, Negroids, or People of Melanin. Note what appears to be his Blonde/Ginger hair. The fact is that Rameses II died at 90 years of age. ABSOLUTELY NO 90-YEAR OLD HAS BLONDE/GINGER HAIR OR ANYTHING LIKE IT. PERIOD. 90-year olds have "WHITE" HAIR AND ONLY "WHITE" HAIR. The hair color is most certainly the result of Henna use. Not surprisingly, there is no resemblance between the supposed mummy of Rameses II and his statues. In all his statues, Rameses is depicted as a rather "round-faced man" while his supposed mummy is a peculiarly long-faced man. As a matter of fact, Rameses II supposed mummy actually looks more like that of a white man and nothing like any of his statues. It gets even more interesting when you realize that the mummy of Pharaoh Seti I, Rameses II's father, is Melanated/Black-skinned and looks absolutely NOTHING like the supposed mummy of his own son.

Also, if one where to look at the supposed mummy of Pharaoh Merenptah, one of the sons of Rameses II, also looks absolutely NOTHING like the supposed mummy of his father, Rameses II. Neither does the Melanated/Black-skinned mummy of an un-named son of Rameses II that The Telegraph did a story on on March 15, 2008. Tests were shown that the 3,000 year old mummy had a pronounced overbite and misaligned eyes, which were akin to members of Kemet's 19th Dynasty, and his facial measurements were even found to be almost identical to those of his father Rameses II himself as displayed on his statues.

Without putting too fine a point on it, the father and sons of Ramses II, all look somewhat alike (like the mummies of Black men), while the "Supposed" Mummy of Ramses II looks nothing like any of them: but instead, looks like the Mummy of a White man. We know that the Tarim Mummies in China, are the mummies of Central Asian Caucasoids, who are just like modern Europeans - who btw are originally from Central Asia. So here's a comparison of the supposed Mummy of Ramses II and the Tarim Mummies. Eye will touch upon this in another post including a picture for comparison to the supposed mummy of Rameses II.
Jesus Christ, read through the thread before you post. They can still detect the natural hair coloring even in white hair. I am so sick of Afrocentrists refusing to read and having to make the same points sometimes up to five times.

[SIZE=3]Professor P. F. Ceccaldi, with a research team behind him, studied some hairs which were removed from the mummy's scalp. Ramesses II was 90 years-old when he died, and his hair had turned white. Ceccaldi determined that the reddish-yellow colour of the mummy's hair had been brought about by its being dyed with a dilute henna solution; it proved to be an example of the cosmetic attentions of the embalmers. However, traces of the hair's original colour (in youth), remain in the roots, even into advanced old age. Microscopic examinations proved that the hair roots contained traces of natural red pigments, and that therefore, during his youth, Ramesses II had been red-haired. It was concluded that these red pigments did not result from the hair somehow fading, or otherwise altering post-mortem, but did indeed represent Ramesses' natural hair colour. Ceccaldi also studied a cross-section of the hairs, and he determined from their oval shape, that Ramesses had been "cymotrich" (wavy-haired). Finally, he stated that such a combination of features showed that Ramesses had been a "leucoderm" (white-skinned person). [Balout, et al. (1985) 254-257.][/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Scientific analysis of his (Ramses II) has confirmed that in his youth, the king was indeed a natural redhead. (Tyldesley 2001). [/SIZE]

Quote:
Originally Posted by tcave360 View Post
Now on to King Tut himself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcave360 View Post

The fact that Rameses II's Mummy seems to resemble Caucasoid people, and not the corresponding Kemetic statues or his relatives at all, causes us to wonder just how that could be. Actually it's quite simple really: as usual, when it comes to Black people and Black history, the Caucasoid people can and will, lie about everything.

KMT
And, for those following along, this is all that you have to know about this racist Afrocentrist with low self esteem.

Last edited by cachibatches; 11-20-2015 at 12:47 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-20-2015, 01:45 PM
 
5,196 posts, read 4,682,312 times
Reputation: 1562
Quote:
Originally Posted by WWlll View Post

iam Egyptian myself and i think i am fully entitled to tell you to not Embrace Egypt and its culture
you call it embracing while everybody knows it is stealing
Quote:
Originally Posted by WWlll View Post

The Spike TV mini series (King Tut) was starred by two dark people, Avan Jogia a half indian and Ben Kingsly, so hollywood are atleast trying

the Movie Exodus with Bale and Edgerton was ofcourse so far from accurate when it comes to how Egyptians look like but atleast i never see the movie director or the fans claiming they believe this is how we looked like or make any dumb claims of ancient Egyptians being anglo Saxon ppl while dismissing us modern Egyptians as anything like ARabs or Romans or Greeks (like afrocentrics do to steal our history)


u know e are not talking about EMBRACING, rather talking about theft, to claim modern EGyptians are "Half Breeds" or "Mongrels" or "invaders" like i have been called by afrocentrics many times isn't "Embracing" and u know that.
Afrocentrism is a magnet and a breeding ground for the dregs and losers of society.

This video will give you a pretty good idea on the demographic that composes this freak show.

As I said before, the slaves are often even worse than their massahs.

Chris Rock Blacks V.S N-words


Last edited by kovert; 11-20-2015 at 02:10 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2015, 09:50 PM
 
931 posts, read 614,962 times
Reputation: 1488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaybo Joe View Post
For the responders that speak so authoritatively about it:
I presume you have spent several years in Africa ? In that case, you would know that even today, the europeans in all of Africa are the richest people there. Owning thousands and thousands of hectares of land. Sometimes as big as entire districts or a small state. Often in the name of conservation.
Why do you suppose they did not leave when colonialism ended ? Because they were invested too much in the land - and I mean that literally, not metaphorically.


The current policies are meant to subjugate Africa and prevent development there. There are always strings attached to aids and loans that prevent industrialization of the continent.

Why don't Africans kick the whites out, why doesn't the African governments decline aids and loans? Why don't Africans empower themselves?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2015, 12:08 AM
 
931 posts, read 614,962 times
Reputation: 1488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaybo Joe View Post
Are you really pro-Africa?
I think Africans should help themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2015, 07:37 PM
AFP
 
6,898 posts, read 4,249,541 times
Reputation: 5878
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcave360 View Post
Not as fabricated as some of the identities of the mummies you Caucasoids have created

I'll touch on King Tut's mummy and identity in a bit but let's take a look at the supposed mummy of Pharaoh Rameses II.

This is just one example of Caucasians producing photos of Rameses II's mummy as "evidence" that the Kemetians were not Blacks, Negroids, or People of Melanin. Note what appears to be his Blonde/Ginger hair. The fact is that Rameses II died at 90 years of age. ABSOLUTELY NO 90-YEAR OLD HAS BLONDE/GINGER HAIR OR ANYTHING LIKE IT. PERIOD. 90-year olds have "WHITE" HAIR AND ONLY "WHITE" HAIR. The hair color is most certainly the result of Henna use. Not surprisingly, there is no resemblance between the supposed mummy of Rameses II and his statues. In all his statues, Rameses is depicted as a rather "round-faced man" while his supposed mummy is a peculiarly long-faced man. As a matter of fact, Rameses II supposed mummy actually looks more like that of a white man and nothing like any of his statues. It gets even more interesting when you realize that the mummy of Pharaoh Seti I, Rameses II's father, is Melanated/Black-skinned and looks absolutely NOTHING like the supposed mummy of his own son.

Also, if one where to look at the supposed mummy of Pharaoh Merenptah, one of the sons of Rameses II, also looks absolutely NOTHING like the supposed mummy of his father, Rameses II. Neither does the Melanated/Black-skinned mummy of an un-named son of Rameses II that The Telegraph did a story on on March 15, 2008. Tests were shown that the 3,000 year old mummy had a pronounced overbite and misaligned eyes, which were akin to members of Kemet's 19th Dynasty, and his facial measurements were even found to be almost identical to those of his father Rameses II himself as displayed on his statues.

Without putting too fine a point on it, the father and sons of Ramses II, all look somewhat alike (like the mummies of Black men), while the "Supposed" Mummy of Ramses II looks nothing like any of them: but instead, looks like the Mummy of a White man. We know that the Tarim Mummies in China, are the mummies of Central Asian Caucasoids, who are just like modern Europeans - who btw are originally from Central Asia. So here's a comparison of the supposed Mummy of Ramses II and the Tarim Mummies. Eye will touch upon this in another post including a picture for comparison to the supposed mummy of Rameses II.
So then you admit you're a liar and on top of that I can see now a racist. In this post you do not present a single fact, simply conjecture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2015, 08:08 PM
AFP
 
6,898 posts, read 4,249,541 times
Reputation: 5878
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcave360 View Post
The Tarim mummies are a series of mummies discovered in the Tarim Basin in present-day Xinjiang, China that date from 1800 B.C. to the first centuries B.C. (you will never find a White skeleton in Europe that old (1800 B.C.): the Central Asian Caucasoids didn't reach Europe until about 600 years later). Although the evidence is inconclusive, the mummies, particularly the earlier ones, are frequently associated with the presence of the Indo-European Tocharian languages in the Tarim Basin. The earliest Tarim mummies, found at Qäwrighul and dated to 1800 B.C, are of a Europoid physical type whose closest affiliation is to the Bronze Age populations of southern Siberia, Kazakhstan, Central Asia, and the Lower Volga. Quick note: Eye want to add a few more pics of the Tarim mummies but I'm new to the attachment function and don't know how to upload multiple photos. I'm using a smartphone if that has anything to do with it.

Now back to business. Remember, the mummies of both Rameses II's father and his sons look like normal indigenous Egyptian/Kemetic Black People. But it appears that the "supposed" mummy of Pharaoh Rameses II looks more like the Caucasoid mummies of Tarim in China. Coincidence?

Eye want to go deeper into the history and ethno-lineage of the Tarim inhabitants but I'll skip ahead to King Tutankhman's identity in the next post in order to keep the thread within line of the OP. Stay tuned.

KMT
Regarding Indo-European languages there is evidence that that the Yamnaya from the Ukranian-Russian steppe introduced that family of languages to Europe 5,000 years ago they are linked to the paternal Y-DNA lineage R1b the most common lineage in Western Europe this was recently proven by analyzing ancient DNA. Read the attached link under language shift. Y-DNA R1b is the ANE component that shows up on various Gedmatch calculators for those that have an interest in genetic genealogy.

Europe's fourth ancestral 'tribe' uncovered - BBC News

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2015/02/10/013433 (This is about the ancient migration from steppe an link to IE languages)

Map of the approximate distribution of Indo-European languages.

http://www.geocurrents.info/wp-conte...Family-Map.png

Last edited by AFP; 11-21-2015 at 08:48 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2015, 03:54 PM
 
Location: Aliso Viejo, Orange County, CA
4,983 posts, read 6,385,851 times
Reputation: 4096
Quote:
Originally Posted by scobby View Post
Tutankhamun was not black: antiquities chief - IOL SciTech | IOL.co.za

Egyptian antiquities chief declared that Tutankhamun was not black ,what's the truth ?


FWIW, there is an interesting depiction of King Tut's parents at the bottom of the page. Some think that Tut and his father may have had a genetic disorder.

A stela at the Egyptian Museum in Cairo shows Pharaoh Akhenaten, his queen and their children worshipping the sun god Aten. Akhenaten, who was Tutankhamun's father, is shown with enlarged breasts and wide hips. That depiction that has led some researchers to suggest he had a genetically related hormonal dysfunction, while others say it was merely the artistic style of that era. Paul Schemm / AP file

Tut, Tut: New View of King Tutankhamun Sparks Debate - NBC News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2015, 08:15 PM
 
3,528 posts, read 2,525,132 times
Reputation: 6828
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperiorMegaman View Post
Why are racists posting on the Africa forum?

Anyway, The concept of black didn't exist back then, but King Tut probably looked like your modern day Ethiopian. Ancient Greeks and Romans acknowledged that Egyptians of that time had dark skin and woolly hair like modern day black Africans.
Jesus Christ in heaven--READ THROUGH THE THREAD BEFORE POSTING IGNORANCE.

The Greeks and Romans described the Egyptians with words that described swarthy white people. We have already derived that and I am not going through it all again when you can simply read what is already posted.

The concept of black African DID exist--they were described by the word "ethiope" which was never used to describe Egyptians, only Nubians.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2015, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Poshawa, Ontario
2,986 posts, read 3,325,924 times
Reputation: 5622
Are people still discussing this silly fantasy of a black King Tut? What's next? A thread on whether or not the world is flat?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2018, 09:20 PM
 
6,569 posts, read 9,083,582 times
Reputation: 2843
Quote:
Originally Posted by cachibatches View Post

The ancient Egyptians are 90% identical to moderns, except that there is more "black" in them now do to the Arab slave trade.

They are a very mixed race, as Eurasians started back migrating to North Africa in the stone ages.
What was the physical appearance of Eurasian people from the Levant area 45,000 years ago? I was told by someone that 45,000 years ago when Eurasians from the Levant had started migrating into North Africa they were still the Black Africans who had left Africa in earlier times. So according to this person the back migrating Eurasians coming into Egypt were still Black people. Western Asia became less Black as more Indo-Europeans migrated into western Asia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Africa
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top