U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Alaska

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 370,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 13,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.

Get a detailed profile of any city, county, or zip code:
      Search our forums (advanced):

Reply

 
Old 11-24-2007, 05:29 AM
Not a member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
1,252 posts
Reputation: 107
User 2 will become famous soon enoughUser 2 will become famous soon enoughUser 2 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by RayinAK View Post
.

If you look at the per-capita data, then it's possible to have more crimes committed in Fairbanks alone than in Colorado.
That doesn't sound good,

...maybe icthy should maybe move to Colorado?


Ray, per-capita crime stats are measured in order to adjust for different sizes of population.

They represent X number of crimes per every 100 hundred persons.

They are formulated the way they are, specifically so that you can draw accurate comparisons between places with different sized populations.


If your not happy with the odds as they figure the odds, you don't look for a way to refigure them to make them appear better so you can ignore them, .....at least I don't.

Ignoring the odds is a bad way to place a bet.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 11-24-2007, 03:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: faibanks alaska
103 posts, read 23,138 times
Reputation: 26
siamiam is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to siamiam Send a message via Yahoo to siamiam
just live here and see

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 11-24-2007, 09:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Not far from Fairbanks, AK
971 posts, read 197,496 times
Reputation: 423
RayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by User 2 View Post
That doesn't sound good,

...maybe icthy should maybe move to Colorado?


Ray, per-capita crime stats are measured in order to adjust for different sizes of population.

They represent X number of crimes per every 100 hundred persons.

They are formulated the way they are, specifically so that you can draw accurate comparisons between places with different sized populations.


If your not happy with the odds as they figure the odds, you don't look for a way to refigure them to make them appear better so you can ignore them, .....at least I don't.

Ignoring the odds is a bad way to place a bet.
The per-capita data uses a figure of 100,000 inhabitants as base, not 100. If you look at the data for all the towns and cities of AK, the crime rate in Juneau is just as high if not higher than the crime rate in Fairbanks. Again, forget about the per-capita number, and add the total crimes committed in each town or city of AK, and match the numbers to each other. Go ahead and add each one, and then tell me how there is less crime committed in a larger town than a small town in Alaska.

Take a look at the rate of murder per State in the year 2006 (100,000 inhabitants as base). Can you see how SOME States that have a huge population can have lower murder rates than Alaska?
Murder Rates 1996 - 2006

[+] Rate this post positively

Last edited by RayinAK; 11-24-2007 at 09:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
 
Old 11-24-2007, 09:53 PM
Not a member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
1,252 posts
Reputation: 107
User 2 will become famous soon enoughUser 2 will become famous soon enoughUser 2 will become famous soon enough
Ray,

I refuse to believe you are unable to see that X per 100 can be expressed as X per 100,000 and still be valid.

In one case, X would be 1, and in the later case X would be .001.

The base rate of ten in order to explain the concept, or exemplify the concept is not wrong.

I've looked at the data, the University of Alaska has looked at the data, law enforcement has looked at the data, and the FBI has compiled and looked at the data.

You want me to believe you can see what they cannot.

I suggest you take a night course in mathematics, with some emphasis on statistical modeling. You're not grasping simple concepts and you're trying to invent a model that has no basis in reality.

Good luck with that. If you're a betting man, I'd sure like to be your bookie.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 11-25-2007, 01:16 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Not far from Fairbanks, AK
971 posts, read 197,496 times
Reputation: 423
RayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by User 2 View Post
Ray,

I refuse to believe you are unable to see that X per 100 can be expressed as X per 100,000 and still be valid.

In one case, X would be 1, and in the later case X would be .001.

The base rate of ten in order to explain the concept, or exemplify the concept is not wrong.

I've looked at the data, the University of Alaska has looked at the data, law enforcement has looked at the data, and the FBI has compiled and looked at the data.

You want me to believe you can see what they cannot.

I suggest you take a night course in mathematics, with some emphasis on statistical modeling. You're not grasping simple concepts and you're trying to invent a model that has no basis in reality.

Good luck with that. If you're a betting man, I'd sure like to be your bookie.
I understand the math, but you said "100" instead of what the tables show. The crime data is based on 100,000, and the number is shown right on the tables. Look it up if you don't believe me. Now, forget about the 100 versus 100,000 as shown on the tables with the data.

Add the numbers and types of crimes for Fairbanks in 2006, then match those numbers against the same types of crimes committed in Anchorage in 2006. Is the total number of the crimes committed in Anchorage in 2006 lower than the total number of crimes committed in Fairbanks?

I am going to make it even easier for you. Here is the link:
Table 8 (Alaska) - Crime in the United States 2006

Now, take a calculator and add every number for Anchorage, beginning with "Violent Crime" at the left side of the table, and ending with the last number at the right side of the table. What's the total? Please enter the number here: ______________

Now, move down the table to Fairbanks, and add the every number beginning with "Violent Crime" at the left of the table, and ending with the last number at the right side of the table. What's the total? Please enter the number here: _______________

Which Alaska city had the greater number of crimes (NOT PER-CAPITA)?

[+] Rate this post positively

Last edited by RayinAK; 11-25-2007 at 01:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
 
Old 11-25-2007, 02:00 AM
Not a member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
1,252 posts
Reputation: 107
User 2 will become famous soon enoughUser 2 will become famous soon enoughUser 2 will become famous soon enough
The reason the totals aren't used for comparison is that there is no comparison to be made.

You have to find a common denominator.

Hence, rate of crime per capita.

Now some people will try to take averages and perform some sleight of hand by 'tricking' people with those averages. That's why it's important to understand statistical modeling.

You can take any number and build a statistic that will 'appear' to make a point.

Take that number and run it through a few more steps and the appearance of a point disappears.

Yes, Anchorage had more incidences of crime, all that tells you is you had a larger sample.

No point can be made beyond that until you apply how that breaks down in relation to other towns and to do that, you have to pick a formula which will account for the difference in sample size unless the populations are the same.

Yes, there are many other known factors which can be considered, which may make some slight statistical variances in the per-capita data, among those variables are:

Population density and degree of urbanization.

Variations in composition of the population, particularly youth concentration.

Stability of the population with respect to residents' mobility, commuting patterns, and transient factors.

Modes of transportation and highway system.

Economic conditions, including median income, poverty level, and job availability.

Cultural factors and educational, recreational, and religious characteristics.

Family conditions with respect to divorce and family cohesiveness.

Climate.

Effective strength of law enforcement agencies.

Administrative and investigative emphases of law enforcement.

Policies of other components of the criminal justice system (i.e.,
prosecutorial, judicial, correctional, and probational).

Citizens' attitudes toward crime.

Crime reporting practices of the citizenry.

The thing is, once you apply all those variables to any two cities, the error margin is offset in one by the error margin in the other since neither city will match in all those socio-economical areas of variance.

The per-capita crime rate will still be valid as a snapshot in time for one to use to judge the relative crime in one area versus another.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 11-25-2007, 02:52 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Not far from Fairbanks, AK
971 posts, read 197,496 times
Reputation: 423
RayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really niceRayinAK is just really nice
My question was very simple:

Total number of crimes committed in Anchorage in 2006 (from the link I posted above), and the total number of crimes committed in Fairbanks in 2006 (from the same link).

I was trying, and trying, and trying, to illustrate (in a very simple but logical way), that in general more crimes are committed in the most populated cities or towns than in less-populated ones. That has been my point all along.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 11-25-2007, 02:57 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Palmer
359 posts, read 98,418 times
Reputation: 90
Marty Van Diest will become famous soon enoughMarty Van Diest will become famous soon enough
Bottom line on crime in Fairbanks or any other place...stay away from stupid people doing stupid things and you will avoid 90% of criminal activity.

Spend most of your time in the bars and on the street and you will likely eventually have a problem.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 12-06-2007, 08:59 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
13 posts, read 7,753 times
Reputation: 13
icthy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty Van Diest View Post
Bottom line on crime in Fairbanks or any other place...stay away from stupid people doing stupid things and you will avoid 90% of criminal activity.

Spend most of your time in the bars and on the street and you will likely eventually have a problem.
True, but I once lived in a bad neighborhood where you could hear gunshots every night, and didn't walk around after the sun went down. It really sucked.

I also grew up in a town with gangs, and I was afraid most days in high school. I don't want that for my kids.

And I like to walk and bike on the street....so hopefully I can do that in Fairbanks.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 12-06-2007, 10:31 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: faibanks alaska
103 posts, read 23,138 times
Reputation: 26
siamiam is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to siamiam Send a message via Yahoo to siamiam
Quote:
Originally Posted by icthy View Post
True, but I once lived in a bad neighborhood where you could hear gunshots every night, and didn't walk around after the sun went down. It really sucked.

I also grew up in a town with gangs, and I was afraid most days in high school. I don't want that for my kids.

And I like to walk and bike on the street....so hopefully I can do that in Fairbanks.
trust me numbers and stats can only say some things. ive lived in some bad areas down in the lower 48 and Hawaii, Fairbanks really isnt any where remotely like that at all. you will have no problem at all riding or biking around Fairbanks in the summer.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It's free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads

Forum Jump

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Alaska

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2008, Advameg, Inc.