![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 350,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 11,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just always remember that Nature and animals about 99% of the time regulate their environment and solve their own problems.
Man on the other hand, causes about 99% of Nature and animal problems. Guess what I am saying is, if you live in a wilderness area, expect and don't condemn (and exterminate) your surroundings . Thats the part that confuses me about Alaskans. Last edited by Sunset_Va; 12-25-2007 at 10:21 PM. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
It shouldn't confuse you. Most of us use our environment to our advantage. Fishing and hunting, foraging etc, are a piece of life up here. We do what we can to ensure what we harvest is renewable, or replaceable. I have never taken a fish I won't eat, or shared meat from an animal without understanding the time involved in the growth of the animal and it's place in nature. Any good hunter follows the rules as laid out by F&G. Anyone who doesn't is nothing more than a poacher, and can decimate a population with complete disregard for the future consequences of his actions.
That's not the average Alaskan by a long shot. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Since we humans are here to stay for awhile, and are supposedly more intelligent than other animal life around us, we don't want to exterminate our surroundings. That makes no sense. What we can do is to blend with or "manage" our surroundings (game, predators, nature, etc.) in order for us to survive. For example, Alaska trappers have learned from the past. Today's trappers in Alaska are very aware that they must take a small portion of the animals they trap, not all. If they exterminate all life around them in one year, then they won't have more animals to trap the following years. Predators, pray, and the environment can be managed for the continuation of all the species when possible. The more you learn about Alaskans and Alaska, the less confused you will be. But you will never learn about us from afar, nor by others who may have the impression that they "really" know about us. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you for responding with out anger. I meant no malice toward any residents, just trying to figure out the big picture. I guess my viewpoint about man's extreme in damaging wildlife is tainted by the fur sealing, whaling that happened in the early 20th century, especially in the South Atlantic.Millions upon millions of those creatures where killed...for what? some vanity people had at that time for fur hats? or oil?
And too in the case of the buffalo in the western plains, man sure didnt know when to stop the slaughter. I just get confused when I hear of the killing of wolves , by the government, but yet using wildlife as a draw promoting tourism. I hope you see my point, I know the last thing Alaskans want to hear is a person outside telling you what to do or how to think. I just wish there was a better understanding by humans , that nature has its checks and balances, and we disrupt those methods when we allow some species to live, and kill others. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roughly 20 years ago we were having similar wolf problems. We wre trapping and relocating them where we could. Some were being hunted by fish and game and private persons. The animal activists took great issue with this and threatened all kinds of action. It was suggested at that time that maybe the activists would like some wolves in their communities. The local airline offered to ship the animals for free. All we needed was a recipient group to stand up and recieve them for their community. This was even before they introduced wolves back into Yellowstone. No recipients were found. The activists declined to have the wolves in their towns, states.
Alaska Fish and Game Department has refined the science to provide the balance as required by our state's constitution. Everyone should butt out and let them do their work. One may wish to look at how fast the wolf population in and around Yellowstone has increased since they were introduced. From several pairs to over a thousand the last time I looked. The big concern for those of us that live in close proximity of wolves is the recent lack of fear of humans. This natural waryness needs to be reinstated to protect a young person walking down a long road to the bus stop. Fish and Game is working towards finding the proper solution to the problem. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I agree, People are animals who cause various damages. Just like a pig digs up roots for food and kills the plant, or a starfish kills reef corals for food, Deer kill aspens eating bark, Beavers downs millions of healthy trees each year for shelter..... I believe that people should watch and maybe even try to stop polluting. No matter which belief you have on the Environment. People create way to much dirty waste. Living with wolves and other "destructive" animals is life and nature, and we are part of it all that. Now, We know, we cause damage. WE, can stop if we want. Wolves are wolves and will continue to be what wolves are. |
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It's free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|