Bridge-to-Nowhere Hack gets tax AWARD (Ketchikan: how much, vs., move to)

[Rance]

If we had a big ol tall bridge...we'd have a place to bungee or base jump. I say build it. I'd much rather spend my tax money on that than the war(s).
For the Record: Wars have cost $700B since 9/11 - On Deadline - USATODAY.com

That works out to about $2,326 for every person in the country. Too bad we can't choose how we'd like our tax dollars to be spent -- or, more accurately, our future tax dollars.

I'll bet very few would choose to spend money destroying and then rebuilding an oil-rich country -- and killing lots of innocent people in the process. But our law-makers know what's best for us.

[Glitch]

Originally Posted by babyorr9

I assume Young is your man? Say what you want about the Parkway, seizure of land by the Feds is an ever so odious thing. Seriously, 398 million for a bridge taller than the Brooklyn bridge and nearly as long as the Golden Gate, in Ketchikan!! Alaska? Don't get me wrong, If you support Young because he does good things and brings federal dollars to the state, I understand that. Realize though, that those fed dollars are either coming from everybody's already too high taxes. Or they're being borrowed on debt. I think you understand why he should be called out.

You have the audacity to quibble about $398 million, which also includes the $1.2 billion Knik Arm bridge, while $27 BILLION was spent on pork that same year, mostly in your Blue Ridge states, like Virginia, North Carolina, and Tennessee? Talk about misplaced priorities. That is like complaining about a lost dollar while being robbed of $50.

Try cleaning up your own house before criticizing others. You might not be considered such an ignorant hypocrite that way.

[Rance]

The nerve of some people...

[arctichomesteader]

I'm an equal opportunity politican/government basher. With less exceptions than I can count on my fingers, our "leaders" in congress should be thrown out of office and into jail for their corruption, wastefulness, trashing of the Constitution and worse...maybe the process can start with my openly socialist senator...

[babyorr9]

Originally Posted by Rance

If we had a big ol tall bridge...we'd have a place to bungee or base jump. I say build it. I'd much rather spend my tax money on that than the war(s).
For the Record: Wars have cost $700B since 9/11 - On Deadline - USATODAY.com

That works out to about $2,326 for every person in the country. Too bad we can't choose how we'd like our tax dollars to be spent -- or, more accurately, our future tax dollars.

I'll bet very few would choose to spend money destroying and then rebuilding an oil-rich country -- and killing lots of innocent people in the process. But our law-makers know what's best for us.

No arguments here. I have heard estimates that up to 3 trillion will be spent on this war before we're through, factoring in the continuing medical care for our wounded troopers. Ill-advised and unfounded never makes for a great war...

[babyorr9]

Originally Posted by Glitch

You have the audacity to quibble about $398 million, which also includes the $1.2 billion Knik Arm bridge, while $27 BILLION was spent on pork that same year, mostly in your Blue Ridge states, like Virginia, North Carolina, and Tennessee? Talk about misplaced priorities. That is like complaining about a lost dollar while being robbed of $50.

Try cleaning up your own house before criticizing others. You might not be considered such an ignorant hypocrite that way.

I'm sorry. According to the latest figures I could find little ol' Alaska, with a population of some 670,000 people ranks numero uno in earmarks per capita. $490 dollars were received per capita. For every dollar gained through pork, Alaska paid in $16. The average for all states was $259 paid in for every pork dollar received. Bringing Home The Bacon - Forbes.com

http://porkbusters.org/2007/04/omb_r...k_data_fun.php
Now, according to the above link, North Carolina is tied for last in earmarks per capita with four other states.
Charlotte Observer | 06/08/2008 | How Carolinas run in race for earmarks
According to the link above, which is for 2008, only 8 states received less per capita than NC. North Carolina is the only state that I can speak for.

Please, these posts aren't meant to offend anyone. I understand that you are as fiercely proud of your state as I am of mine, with good reason. However, more heat will continue to come down on Don Young, as it should. In no way does his name need to be associated with the Republican party. He is under investigation by the FBI for taking bribes; He is also under investigation for altering an earmark (after the bill had passed the house and senate) to benefit a campaign contributor.

[warptman]

I don't think most of us Alaskans care what you think or post here, might as well give up on telling us what we know already. We don't like it when someone from the lesser 48 try to change things up here and they don't even live here.

[babyorr9]

Originally Posted by warptman

I don't think most of us Alaskans care what you think or post here, might as well give up on telling us what we know already. We don't like it when someone from the lesser 48 try to change things up here and they don't even live here.

I don't care whether you care or not. Young will be reigned in whether you like it or not. Palin squirmed over the bridge, and with more visibility I dare say fewer pork dollars will come your way. You guys can do whatever you want; don't spend my dollars or my grandkids.

[warptman]

We thank you for your contributions to the great state of Alaska!

[babyorr9]

Originally Posted by warptman

We thank you for your contributions to the great state of Alaska!

Sure thing, and thanks for the oil!