Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Alaska
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-06-2009, 03:26 PM
 
Location: on top of a mountain
6,994 posts, read 12,734,672 times
Reputation: 3286

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rance View Post
Until she eats meat and gets some iron to her brain...she won't make much sense of anything. Plant killers are all alike.
beautiful statement Rance!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-06-2009, 03:45 PM
 
Location: South Dakota
4,137 posts, read 9,104,306 times
Reputation: 1925
Ah hells...Northword, Mark, Rance, Brian, and akck, consider yourselves repped until I can spread the love. Doug - you also.

I do tend to feel a sense of pity for the uninformed (or is it ill-informed?). Whilst enjoying a fine breakfast that included reindeer sausage grilled perfectly, I overheard the next table full of gents discussing the merits of aerial wolf-hunting and how it saved their horses from impending doom as the wolves had been harassing their stocks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2009, 04:41 PM
 
3,774 posts, read 11,227,390 times
Reputation: 1862
What ticks me off is the assumption that aerial hunting is a decision made to eliminate the wolves rather than one leg of the predator control the state uses to maintain the population size in an area twice the size of Texas. I find the practice distasteful but necessary. I think wolves are magnificent animals but they have to kill local meat animals to maintain (and grow) their populations. As the packs grow and move, they have depleted the populations.

A land without roads, without the local infrastructure to suppport the trapping and ground hunting required means that we must control it by aerial control. No other reasonable way exists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2009, 04:50 PM
 
Location: Bethel, Alaska
21,368 posts, read 38,123,667 times
Reputation: 13901
Mal, I can come pick you up with my Supercub and we can go shoot a few wolves!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2009, 04:52 PM
 
3,774 posts, read 11,227,390 times
Reputation: 1862
Works for me. I get to keep the ruffs to line my next parka.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2009, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Barrow, Alaska
3,539 posts, read 7,651,940 times
Reputation: 1836
Quote:
Originally Posted by JavaPhil View Post
What ticks me off is the assumption that aerial hunting is a decision made to eliminate the wolves rather than one leg of the predator control the state uses to maintain the population size in an area twice the size of Texas.
Your statement is valid, in part. The unfortunate part is that it has been very clear for literally decades that about half of those involved are indeed simply interested in shooting wolves for the sake of killing them (all if possible). Machine Gun Kellyhouse didn't get his knickname for nothing. Ralph Seekins and more than one other semi-significant politician are other examples.

That particular branch of the pro-wolf control side has done more harm to those who would like to have sensible management of Fish and Wildlife in Alaska than all of the eco-nuts combined.
Quote:
I find the practice distasteful but necessary. I think wolves are magnificent animals but they have to kill local meat animals to maintain (and grow) their populations. As the packs grow and move, they have depleted the populations.
Now, if we would only limit wolf control programs to locations where that is known to be true!

And I would also suggest that improving trophy and sport hunting is not a valid purpose for wolf control. The single valid reason is to increase subsistence take of meat animals.
Quote:
A land without roads, without the local infrastructure to suppport the trapping and ground hunting required means that we must control it by aerial control. No other reasonable way exists.
But not helicopters.

And regardless of that... do you realize that there is a large body of evidence available to provide guidance for how to design wolf control programs, and that most of it suggests that random arial hunting programs virtually never succeed at reducing wolf predation? It breaks up large packs, leaving many smaller packs, which tend to breed faster. In decades past it was a great way to provide a few jobs in bush locations, and worked very well because there was no possibility that those employed could work themselves out of a job! (I lived on the Kuskokwim River in the 1970s, and spend lots of time talking to the old guys that used to hunt wolves in the 50's and 60's, and personally knew most of the ones who were involved in the 1970's wolf control programs.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2009, 07:59 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
823 posts, read 1,732,677 times
Reputation: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by warptman View Post
Mal, I can come pick you up with my Supercub and we can go shoot a few wolves!
Hey, I want to go too....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2009, 11:43 PM
 
Location: Florida
1,329 posts, read 2,943,662 times
Reputation: 631
I've always wanted a wolf fur coat, but hey, will settle for a fox
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2009, 12:03 AM
 
Location: Alaska
7,500 posts, read 5,749,500 times
Reputation: 4883
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueflames50 View Post
Had ta rep ya on this one!! Precious!! just precious!! OMG I can't wait to meet people on this forum in person!!!
We will be here waiting for ya
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2009, 12:04 AM
 
Location: South Dakota
4,137 posts, read 9,104,306 times
Reputation: 1925
Quote:
Originally Posted by lyoness View Post
I've always wanted a wolf fur coat, but hey, will settle for a fox
Would you like that in Arctic White or Blazing Red??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Alaska
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top