U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Alaska
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 05-28-2009, 12:08 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Barrow, Alaska
1,473 posts, read 813,630 times
Reputation: 580
Floyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to all
Default Establishment of Fort Yukon

Fort Yukon was indeed established in 1847... as a Hudson Bay Company trading post, by a 27 year old fellow named Alexander Murray, on the direct orders of Sir George Simpson. The post remained in operation until 1869, when the US informed them they were on US soil and told them to leave.

It's interesting because, while it was established during the Russian American period in Alaska's history, the the farthest up river trading post established by the Russians was at Nulato. A Russian Orthodox church was at Russian Mission.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-28-2009, 10:27 AM
Livin Life Down A Long Dirt Road
Status: "In Wonderful Sterling..." (set 5 days ago)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: I live in Alaska but my heart is in Sweden
10,514 posts, read 7,892,539 times
Reputation: 7708
Rance has a reputation beyond reputeRance has a reputation beyond reputeRance has a reputation beyond reputeRance has a reputation beyond repute
Rance has a reputation beyond reputeRance has a reputation beyond reputeRance has a reputation beyond reputeRance has a reputation beyond reputeRance has a reputation beyond reputeRance has a reputation beyond reputeRance has a reputation beyond reputeRance has a reputation beyond reputeRance has a reputation beyond reputeRance has a reputation beyond repute
Bummer. You'd think the US would have allowed some established spot to remain after the sale.
__________________
People may doubt what you say...but they will believe what you do...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2009, 11:46 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Barrow, Alaska
1,473 posts, read 813,630 times
Reputation: 580
Floyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to allFloyd_Davidson is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rance View Post
Bummer. You'd think the US would have allowed some established spot to remain after the sale.
It is kind of odd. When Murray first went to that location he was continuously told by the Gwich'in people that the Russians claimed trade rights there and visited often (with trading expeditions from the post at Nulato), and that he could expect to be tossed out with violence if he resisted. As a result, he did literally build a "fort", with words to the effect of "let 'em come"! But the Russians never bothered him.

The original name was Fort Youcon, and the spelling was later changed. Whatever, there is no pre-1867 Russian heritage at Fort Yukon.

Along the same lines, the Russians at Sitka were trading with the British (which didn't make the Russian government too happy) in order to get enough supplies to support the colony. that too was ended with the US takeover in 1867.

A huge part of the dismal history of Sitka under US Army rule was that General Davis had no authority to make any kind of agreement with Natives (even an agreement to employ individuals) and the US did not want the British trading in Alaska. Commerce ceased, and there were no jobs because the US Army, unlike the Russians, could not hire anyone for anything. Sitka had been a town of thousands, and shrank to almost nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Alaska

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:59 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 - Top