Quote:
Originally Posted by aries63
Disingenuous, mortimer. You cannot say you support the film industry's
presence while their presence depends on subsidies which you abhor.
|
Sure I can. The film industry's presence does not depend on subsidies.
The film industry is
extremely profitable and must produce films somewhere.
It might be that they will have a much diminished role in NM as they
chase
giveaways from other states as they milk their taxpayers.
I can surely say that I support the film industry's unsubsidized continued presence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aries63
You yourself said "good riddance" to Sony. Is this the
two-faced "we love the sinner, but hate the sin" kind of crap?
|
Hardly.
I say "good riddance" to a company that doesn't need handouts, but solicits
handouts - that only locates in places where their business model includes,
basically, stealing from working people and giving to the executives.
It is what the US has done, nationally, with the financial industry.
I don't make distinctions between bankers and filmmakers.
Why do consider my belief that taking money from existing companies
and giving it to well-funded lobbying out-of-state companies "disingenuous?"
Here is a list of the top 40 ( Flying 40, a local growth-ranking list )
( unformatted and not sure I got them all ... ) The 2011 Flying 40 Awards:
------------------------------------------------
Abba Technologies, Inc. Caldera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Great River Technology Senspex Incorporated
Advanced Logistics Support Cor Commercial Data Systems HealthXnet (Healthcare Extrane Source Technologies, LLC
Affordable Solar Group, LLC Computational Analysis and Net Holman's, Inc. Speridian Technologies, LLC
Altela, Inc. CVI Melles Griot Ktech Corporation TEAM Technologies Inc.
Analytical Solutions, Inc. Deep Web Technologies, Inc. Los Alamos Technical Associate Technology Management Company,
Applied Research Associates, I Delta Group Electronics, Inc. Management Sciences, Inc. TechSource, Inc.
Applied Technology Associates Emcore Corporation Marpac Inc. Vista Photonics, Inc.
Ardham Technologies, Inc. Entereza, Inc. MZA Associates Corporation ZTEC Instruments, Inc.
Aspen Avionics, Inc. Fiore Industries, Inc. Sacred Power Corporation
------------------------------------------------
These companies created thousands of jobs here. How many jobs have not been
created because of additional taxes levied against them to help fund film subsidies?
I don't know if it can even be measured, but I am convinced, it's a factor.
Calling me a "two-face" is not a productive way to help win me over to the dark side.
Why do attribute malicious intent from me when I am simply trying to have
a civil disagreement on state expenditures? I see film subsidies has hurting
me. Somewhere, somehow, I have to pay more taxes to fund these rich
b@stards so that they can claim to be creating jobs for the little people.
I see it as crony capitalism. I am against it. It's up to proponents to
show me and others, in reasoned tones, that it is
not crony capitalism.
I don't know how you are going get past the transfer payments part, but I welcome the dialogue.
Sorry.
I didn't like it when we handed taxpayer money to Haliburton and I don't like it when we do it with Sony.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornflakes
Is this your "Drive-by Sarcasm" at work?
|
Just what are you saying was sarcasm in my post?