|

07-13-2008, 12:28 AM
|
|
Fretless Bass Forever
Status:
"Children should not be taught improper fractions."
(set 25 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort Worth, TX
3,896 posts, read 2,394,133 times
Reputation: 1289
|
|
|
Towanda: Excellent. That is precisely what my opinion is. (And I'm not just saying that because you're a moderator! Really!)
|
|

07-13-2008, 01:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
130 posts, read 87,298 times
Reputation: 50
|
|
|
Skyscrapers per say are nit required, but a sure sign that a local economy is on the upswing it so see construction, that means cranes, concrete, steel, and yes, high rise buildings.
|
|

07-13-2008, 04:11 PM
|
|
Green please!
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Burque!
2,994 posts, read 1,729,007 times
Reputation: 477
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by abqsunport
Well I too would like to see Albuquerque's downtown to grow. I want some new high rises--but for more than a skyline. I want there to be businesses and people in downtown to make it a vibrant fun completely Unique place. I want all the new high rises to be architecturally different than anywhere USA. Perhaps there is some way the buildings could be built with the culture in mind?
|
That would be great!
|
|

07-14-2008, 12:08 AM
|
|
Livin' it up in Burque!
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM & Las Vegas, NV
2,531 posts, read 1,716,172 times
Reputation: 450
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rybert
I think the issue with stars would be light pollution. (see: cities that are huge)
|
well i'm totally not being rude or smart with you, but dont you think that if people wanna see stars they should consider moving to the country instead of a city like albuquerque, i mean its growning..pollution will get worse.
i mean there are cities like santa fe, espanola, silver city and roswell that dont have pollution those would be better cities to check into. 
|
|

07-14-2008, 12:16 AM
|
|
Livin' it up in Burque!
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM & Las Vegas, NV
2,531 posts, read 1,716,172 times
Reputation: 450
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catman
Wow, dude, take a pill. I was just giving my opinion. No need to get your knickers in a twist. Having worked at Six Flags in Arlington every summer and some winters for about ten years, I have no special love for the place, being a big plastic overpriced series of advertisements, but to each his own. If you want Albuquerque to look like Dallas, so be it.
I don't understand this idea that to look like a 'real city', it has to have skyscrapers. I like the urban planning idea of spreading the city out, so that it has nodes away from downtown where people can find nearly everything they need nearby. It makes sense, especially with the high fuel prices which I fear are here to stay. Let's try to have a civil discussion without so many exclamation points. (!!!!!)
Also bear in mind that a big water park, especially in a dry climate like Albuquerque's, is going to use and lose a huge amount of water. I like water parks (they are fun), but in an area struggling with an ongoing drought, it might be better to do without.
|
well if gas prices are going up..dont you think that the city should grow inword..? and albuquerque is trying to conserve water for the future there is not really a drought in albuquerque silly there is a river that runs right threw town..its just that its growing so fast they wanna make sure it has water for the way future.. people would kill for a water park, ever been to the beach water park before it closed..? that place was crowded like major..and several studies are actually being taken by the city..to see how they can better serve us haha i think its funny. sorry i went all off on ya but take some deep thought... Look at this as well rio rancho is a city of 95,000 citizens, in late 2009 there are plans to build 5 large tall highrises and by then the city will only have say...115,000 people? dont you think it will be embrassing if that little city has bigger buildings?
|
|

07-14-2008, 01:41 AM
|
|
Fretless Bass Forever
Status:
"Children should not be taught improper fractions."
(set 25 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort Worth, TX
3,896 posts, read 2,394,133 times
Reputation: 1289
|
|
|
I wouldn't be 'embarrassed' if Rio Rancho had taller buildings than Albuquerque. I mean, so what? It isn't the only measure of a city, and Albuquerque has lots of stuff that Rio Rancho will never have.
I'm sure a water park has been and would be popular, but that doesn't make it a good idea. Just because Albuquerque has a river running through it doesn't mean that there isn't a long-standing drought in the Southwestern US, of which Albuquerque is a part.
No problem about your 'going off' on me. I was more amused than angry. You were just excited.
|
|

07-14-2008, 02:53 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Albuquerque,New Mexico
3,687 posts, read 2,663,910 times
Reputation: 1206
|
|
|
I would love an outdoor water park so I dont have to go on the same water ride over and over at cliffs, and I wont use the indoor water park they are building cause thats no fun. I want the sun shinning on me.
We need skyscrapers downtown, both residential and commercial, we need restaurants,we need shopping,we need a grocery store,we need activities, and we need an arena. The more people living downtown in a high rise the less sprawl it creates, I would love to be able to walk to work or to the store, but downtown needs some cleaning up first, too many thugs, drunk kids,homeless and weirdos.
If its the soil that cant hold a skyscrapper then that is fine,atleast we have a reason why we dont have em and people can give it a rest but at least a few more mid rises taller than the bank building would do. I see Omaha,Louisville,Ok City,Tulsa, and those cities downtowns just look so nice,even Boise is getting in on it, all but ABQ.
Abq,El Paso and Tucson have the smallest skylines for their size, maybe its just the way the Southwest does it, I dont know.
|
|

07-14-2008, 04:51 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
18 posts, read 12,239 times
Reputation: 10
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trappedinNM
I'm all for the arena as long as zero taxpayer dollars are expended on it.
|
same here see those tax dollars on peoples homes go up  ridiculous.
|
|

07-14-2008, 11:09 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
1,266 posts, read 1,033,859 times
Reputation: 352
|
|
|
catman and desert sun, both of your posts have intrigued me.
First, I view all cities in the Albuquerque Metro as Albuquerque. Rio Rancho to me is simply Albuquerque. Kinda like Tempe to me will always be Phoenix. However, I was under the impression that the new building wouldn't be highrises, rather midrises. The tallest building in Rio Rancho right now is 4-5 stories. They have a ways to go before they have a building that hits 10 floors.
I agree Albuquerque's downtown needs more going on. I would prefer some highrises (but not skyscrapers) just fill in the skyline a little bit, and to bring more people down there.
Yes, the Southwest (and west in general) have small skylines. Phoenix, for a city of its size, has a very dissapointing downtown. Several California cities are the same way. However, OKC's downtown really isn't that impressive. It hasn't had a big building built in over 30+ years.
Albuquerque does need a few more high rise buildings--if for nothing else, just to have a few new and modern touches. Why are people so sensitive to mild growth? Albuquerque will never be NYC, but why can't it be more like San Antonio? San Antonio has kept its culture masterfully with all of its growth.
|
|

07-14-2008, 11:14 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico
2,648 posts, read 2,196,881 times
Reputation: 544
|
|
In San Antonio there are no mountains to block with high rises. That is the difference I see. 
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|