Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Mexico > Albuquerque
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-16-2009, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Burque!
3,557 posts, read 10,215,780 times
Reputation: 859

Advertisements

We used the 8" in my old college astronomy class (pretty disgusting that that was the first time in my life I had seen Saturn's Rings... thanks for nothing APS/Moriarty!).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-16-2009, 03:09 PM
 
1,938 posts, read 4,748,790 times
Reputation: 895
Unfortunately, this got built 3 years after I graduated (class of '67)...

Fairfax County Public Schools Planetarium Website

Fairfax county schools wound up with a total of 9 planetariums in high schools.
Some of those schools have been renamed and reoriented over the years
so that a couple are now middle schools but the facilities are still there.

Fairfax County Public Schools Planetarium Website

I have to admit, it is only now, many years later, that I really appreciate
the benefits that came from growing up in a well funded, high quality,
public school system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2009, 03:36 PM
 
Location: Burque!
3,557 posts, read 10,215,780 times
Reputation: 859
Absolutely. Moriarty/APS were great for everything but Science (just my experience... no haters please).

Anybody here a member of The Albuquerque Astronomical Society (TAAS)? I'm looking more into it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2009, 03:42 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque
5,548 posts, read 16,076,111 times
Reputation: 2756
rybert asks:

> I'm looking into a new Meade 8"... what are your thoughts on this?

The current equatorial diameter of Saturn in is 19.1 arc seconds
which is about .3 arc minutes which is about 1/2 of 1% of a degree.

For reference, the diameter of the moon is about 1/2 degree
or 30 minutes of arc <or> 188 times that of Saturn.

Therefore, if you have a telescope that can deliver about 200x
power, you can view Saturn through it at a slightly larger
apparent diameter than you can the moon with your naked eye.

The 8" Meade will give you 200x usable power on plantary objects
- even in the city - maybe a little more in "great" conditions.

Can I come over and drool on your telescope after you get it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2009, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Burque!
3,557 posts, read 10,215,780 times
Reputation: 859
Should I not upgrade to the 8" yet?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2009, 11:31 AM
 
Location: Albuquerque
5,548 posts, read 16,076,111 times
Reputation: 2756
rybert asked:

> Should I not upgrade to the 8" yet?

I'm not sure I understand the question.

Earlier, you asked:

> > I'm looking into a new Meade 8"... what are your thoughts on this?

I thought my description of what an 8" scope could do for you
would help ( those were my "thoughts" ).

Do you currently have a smaller Meade scope ( or something else ) and
are wondering about upgrading?

My thinking is that if you know what a better scope or car or computer
can do for you and you have the ability to afford it and you want it and
your priorities lean in that direction, you should do it.

Judging from your willingness to post your thoughts here in the forum,
I'm really confused by what you are asking.

I would think you would either say " seeing Saturn so big would be great " or
nah, ... I'll pass and wait till I can afford to see it at 400x <--- or something
like that. This indecision, it seems, .... seems, .... so not-rybert-ish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2009, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
5,610 posts, read 23,301,938 times
Reputation: 5447
Thanks for the link and information, mortimer and ZiaAirmac. I'm just a total newbie at astronomy, but it's something I could see myself getting more into over the years. My dad's a real astronomy buff, I'm going to relay this info to him. Nice to know about TAAS. In any case, I think you're right that even just a little bit out of Albuquerque has got to blow away the night skies in the middle of suburban Denver. And right now where I'm temporarily residing (the middle of LA), you can't see ANY stars at night.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2009, 09:20 PM
 
Location: Burque!
3,557 posts, read 10,215,780 times
Reputation: 859
Yeah... not very me-ish. I'm just debating the cost vs. use. Maybe just looking for an external push toward an object that I may not "need," but "want."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2009, 10:00 PM
 
Location: Metromess
11,798 posts, read 25,175,776 times
Reputation: 5219
I've had an 8" Celestron SchmIdt-Cassegrain for almost 30 years that has given me many hours of pleasure. It works on bright stuff like planets here in the city, but to get the most out of it, I have to take it out of the light pollution. I've taken it to the Texas Star Party a couple of times and was amazed by what I could see. It works well up to around 300x on a good night.

Before that, I had a 10" reflector that I could see Pluto with, but it weighed about 120 pounds and was such a pain to take out and set up that I didn't use it all that much. The C-8 only weighs 1/3rd as much.

The department-store refractors just aren't big enough to support the magnifications they claim. They will make them, but they'll be dim, fuzzy and useless. Light-gathering power is what matters most. I wouldn't mind having a 4" or larger refractor to use on planets, though, since their unobstructed light path gives great resolution and contrast.

Another point: Having a mountain range between you and a big city like Albuquerque, will block the direct light from it, but it won't do anything about the light being scattered in the atmosphere above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2009, 12:17 PM
 
Location: NM
147 posts, read 535,199 times
Reputation: 50
Default check this out

The Endangered Night Sky Darkness Project at CCNHP
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Mexico > Albuquerque

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top