Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedevilz
Yeah....
There is a good reason this "outrageous" infomercial is not front page news and on every "news" channel...
Blaylock is a first rate quack....
|
How typical .. he's a quack. Blaylock's resume is out there for everyone to see. He's a neurosurgeon, which requires the most in depth medical education and training of ALL medical specialties. And when it comes to brain disorders and neurotoxicity, there are no medical professionals more qualified to speak to those issues than a board certified neurosurgeon.
Mod cut: irrelevant
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedevilz
There is no data to back up any of the outrageous bullet points you have listed....more fairy tales.
....some examples....
Per your "expert"
National Institute of Health published data showing that the H1N1 vaccine was between 67 -75% completely ineffective in children, though apparently no one bothered to read this or inform parents who are scurrying to get Junior vaccinated
The truth....
"NIAID Director Anthony Fauci, M.D., said in a Sept. 21 media briefing that a single 15-microgram dose of a nonadjuvanted vaccine against 2009 H1N1 influenza generated a robust immune response in 76 percent of 10- to 17-year-olds eight to 10 days after immunization."
One Dose of H1N1 Vaccine Immunogenic in High Percentage of Youth Ages 10 to 17 -- AAFP News Now -- American Academy of Family Physicians
Imagine that.....the exact OPPOSITE of the fairy tale you posted...
Per your expert....
|
Attention, word games won't work. First, you cite age 10-17 group, when it was clear I was referring to young children. But more importantly, and EVERYONE NEEDS TO PAY ATTENTION TO THIS PART because it's a clever play on words ...
" ... generated a robust immune response" does NOT prove efficacy of preventing infection. There is an endless list of foreign matter that will generate an immune response when injected. And in so doing, you actually suppress the immune system by doing so, making you MORE vulnerable to infection. It's quite well established science that suppressed immune systems are less capable of defending against infection. Furthermore, I have posted several times the information contained in one of the flu vaccine product inserts that states quite clearly that "the mechanisms conferring protection after administration of the flu vaccine is not fully understood". (meaning: they don't know how it works)
But even more importantly, master studies (reviewing the actual data across several studies) performed shows that flu vaccine in children under 5 years of age showed zero efficacy. Children older than 5, showed minimal efficacy of 33% (67% ineffective), and ages 14-40 only 6% decrease in clinically diagnosed influenza infection.
Seven Inconvenient Truths About the 2009 H1N1 Flu Pandemic | HealthBeat News (http://healthbeatnews.com/news/archives/488 - broken link)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedevilz
Hep B vaccine causes a 310% increase in MS in children
The truth...
"A study conducted in France from 1994 to 2003 (Mikaeloff, 2007) did not find a relationship between vaccination for hepatitis B and the development of childhood-onset multiple sclerosis. The 143 cases included children with onset of MS before age of 16 years. 1,122 control subjects were selected randomly from the general French population. The rate of a first episode of MS was not increased for hepatitis B vaccination."
CDC - Hepatitis B and Multiple Sclerosis ( MS) - Vaccine Safety
Imagine that....wrong again 
|
Yes, everyone needs to become aware of how many studies and data is artificially manipulated. First, AND THIS IS IMPORTANT, the rate of MS diagnosed before the age of 16 is only 2-4% of all MS cases, or approximately 1/100,000. Therefore a singular study of 1,122 control subjects is as USELESS AS NO STUDY AT ALL. With such numbers, you could have a true and actual 200 fold or more increase in MS within that age group that could easily not appear in such a small and isolated control group. The study cited IS USELESS from a clinical perspective, and PROVES ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
It's the same thing with GBS ... which strikes 1/750,000, and they conduct a safety study that uses 5,000 subjects. Figures lie, and liars figure.
The ONLY way to show a correlation or lack thereof is to use all data across numerous studies to get enough baseline numbers that could possibly show anything meaningful.
Some may miss the point ... but I suspect the majority can easily see the smokescreen here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedevilz
|
Once again, I acknowledge the fact that there are tons of sources within the mainstream medical circles that deny any link between autism and mercury containing thimerosal. And not one of them is without vested interests in supporting this ridiculous assertion.
Yet the neurotoxicity of mercury is UNDENIABLE. What is also undeniable is the accumulation of mercury across the many childhood vaccines that utilized thimerosal exceeded the EPA toxicity levels by thousands of times, and such cumulative amounts are totally ignored. The false argument between methylmercury and ethylmercury is also used, but that too is a smokescreen since animal studies using monkeys have shown a doubling of mercury accumulation in the brain tissue, and the associated inflammation that persisted for over 500 days after exposure of these animals injected with ethylmercury (thimerosal), compared to the organic methylmercury.
Also, neurological inflammation is closely associated with the onset of MS, by the way.
From the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences:
http://www.generationrescue.org/pdf/burbacher.pdf (broken link)
From the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health
http://www.generationrescue.org/pdf/encephalopathies.pdf (broken link)
From The International Journal of Toxicology
http://www.generationrescue.org/pdf/holmes2.pdf (broken link)
From The Neuroscientist
http://www.generationrescue.org/pdf/herbert.pdf (broken link)
From The Journal of Pediatrics
http://www.generationrescue.org/pdf/stajich.pdf (broken link)
From US House of Representatives report
http://www.generationrescue.org/pdf/burton.pdf (broken link)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedevilz
I could go on....but really what's the point?
|
Exactly. What is the point? The point is exactly this ... basic common sense demands that the anecdotal evidence of a correlation between mercury containing vaccines and autism should be taken seriously, given the fact that mercury is a known neurotoxin, and autism is a neurological disease. One is not a "quack" to recognize the association between being poisoned and the presence of poison. Only a "quack" would try to claim that the second most toxic substance known to exist is perfectly safe to inject into babies, and then deny that this neurotoxic substance isn't the possible cause of an explosion of neurological diseases in those babies afterward.
Mod cut: no discussion of moderation