Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Austres pays, autres moeurs.
Different countries, different customs.
There's no universal code of morality as human beings have to adapt to their environment.
If women in Latin America find that rich foreigners are desirable notwithstanding age and physical appearance, they are not acting differently than German and French women that married any American soldier after the war. To interpret that women in rich western countries are not steered by money or social factors is naïve and nonsensical.
As to the title of this post, reminds of the rationale behind Trump's voters.
Women in poor countries all around the entire universe are more competive, just as women working in maquiladoras are more economical, also foreigners from developed countries are considered rich so they are socially rewarding according to their environment.
No different than when American soldiers made love to any European women paying with cigarretes and nylon stockings.
Women in developed countries are logically worried as they perceive they are not competitive, that's why they resort to all sorts of moral disqualifications from a grotesque position of moral superiority. They are not superior from a moral standpoint at all.
There's a parallelism here, as German women that married American soldiers were also slandered by other German women also from a moral-patriotic standpoint..which is demential.
Last edited by joachim1000; 05-06-2016 at 11:04 AM..
Austres pays, autres moeurs.
Different countries, different customs.
There's no universal code of morality as human beings have to adapt to their environment.
If women in Latin America find that rich foreigners are desirable notwithstanding age and physical appearance, they are not acting differently than German and French women that married any American soldier after the war. To interpret that women in rich western countries are not steered by money or social factors is naïve and nonsensical. As to the title of this post, reminds of the rationale behind Trump's voters.
Women in poor countries all around the entire universe are more competive, just as women working in maquiladoras are more economical, also foreigners from developed countries are considered rich so they are socially rewarding according to their environment.
No different than when American soldiers made love to any European women paying with cigarretes and nylon stockings.
Women in developed countries are logically worried as they perceive they are not competitive, that's why they resort to all sorts of moral disqualifications from a grotesque position of moral superiority. They are not superior from a moral standpoint at all.
There's a parallelism here, as German women that married American soldiers were also slandered by other German women also from a moral-patriotic standpoint..which is demential.
Regarding the part highlighted in red.. whatever ! There are no stupid questions ... if you are so offended by the question maybe you need to take a moment and reflect on why? Note to my own self ... I need to go back to creating more fun thread ...!
I do not find the question specially idiotic, just reminded me about Trump voters complaining about factories moving to Mexico.
Women that vote for Trump might well say......they have lower requirements, that is why they are stealing our men..
I do really abhor those old parrots that go to church or similar everyday and are always judging everybody
Sorry. I am Canadian and did not exactly get what specific thing Trump said you where referring to. I am honestly just tonning him out and hoping someone else wins. My thought are not about. "stealing our men". It is more about the idea that a man from where I am at could be delusional or disrespectful enough to think that a woman from Latin America would tolerate more nonsense or just have lower standards (whatever way you want to define it).
Sorry this might seem like a strange comment to add in but my thought about this are like my thoughts about the lyrics from this call in The Summertime Lyrics
" In the summertime when the weather is hot
You can stretch right up and touch the sky
When the weather's fine
You got women, you got women on your mind
Have a drink, have a drive
Go out and see what you can find If her daddy's rich take her out for a meal If her daddy's poor just do what you feel
Speed along the lane
Do a ton or a ton an' twenty-five
When the sun goes down
You can make it, make it good in a lay-by" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW_MJRscgHE
And before anyone possibly pinpoints this type of attitude of the fact the artist singing is from the Caribbean please note this song was written by a British rock group Mungo Jerry in the 1970s.
It is a cute little catchy song, but this particular line especially when I was younger made me wow is this how men decide how to treat women? If I came from a poorer family does this mean I guy would or should treat me worse? The remake of this song was very popular where I am from and I have to wonder if hearing words like this a popular song does get translated subconsciously as being a socially acceptable way of thinking.
To answer your question.
When people are in dire need, they have no standards.
Nothing to do with morals, human beings are like that.
As those countries improve and middle class grows in the future, they might go to Canada for the same reason.
After all, those countries are Catholic and not Lutheran.
Evil and moralina are not associated with sex, booze and gambling.
I agree. This is likely because the educated or middle or higher class women are likely more similar to the average Canadian or American woman.
They are less parochial and more worldly, more European minded.
Not ridden with guilt.
The ones that are similar to Canadians live in isolated rural communities with Methodist churches.
The priest or minister packs their heads with smut, guilt, SIN.
So those poor girls end up like behaving like a crazy nun, seeing sin and filth everywhere.
Last edited by joachim1000; 05-07-2016 at 10:56 AM..
They are less parochial and more worldly, more European minded.
Not ridden with guilt.
The ones that are similar to Canadians live in isolated rural communities with Methodist churches.
The priest or minister packs their heads with smut, guilt, SIN.
So those poor girls end up like behaving like a crazy nun, seeing sin and filth everywhere.
Oh God what are you talking about? Lol. Yes all women in Canada are as pure and innocent as freshly falling snow . I am actually okay with that stereotype ... feel free to spread it around. It is much more favourable then some of other ones I have heard !
I am not saying that. I come from a former European religious dictatorship and I know that self righteous and judgemental people are always rotten to the core. Not innocent, just rotten from inception.
I am not saying that. I come from a former European religious dictatorship and I know that self righteous and judgemental people are always rotten to the core. Not innocent, just rotten from inception.
I actually agree with that. Hence my personal discomfort around self proclaimed very religious people.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.