Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-17-2016, 02:11 PM
 
Location: PHX -> ATL
6,311 posts, read 6,806,003 times
Reputation: 7167

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlawrence01 View Post
I hear more panic from people on City-Data than I hear when I attend water management board meetings and lectures from hydrologists at the University of Arizona.
This.

Also OP, counties vary on how much they rely on the CAP. Some of the far northern counties for an example are almost 100% reliant on the CAP. Phoenix and Tucson less so.

Part of me hopes the drought gets worse to discourage others from moving here. Leave it for the people who don't mind taking short showers and have no need for a grass yard. Sick of people moving to Arizona and trying to make it something it isn't. Maybe it'll scare the retirees into Florida and stop some of our endless sprawl and UHI which actually does affect our precipitation a little bit. Sick of people moving here for usually cheap housing and no snow and no humidity and then complaining about everything Arizona offers. It makes Arizona look like a used diaper in comparison to the rest of the country, we should have residents who are proud to live here, not necessarily to the level of Texans but it shouldn't be an overwhelming amount of residents who think the state is crap. These transplants have been a stain on Arizona and Phoenix in particular, they have changed Arizona into a hot, republican Midwest state and it will never be back to the way it used to be. But when the drought does get worse, and it will, all these transplants will go back to the lives they left behind with zero guilt in contributing to what Arizona will become and leave us with hundreds maybe even thousands of empty homes and a broken economy. Phoenix will be a Detroit 2.0. Meanwhile some of us natives, who have had our entire lives entrenched in this state will be screwed trying to bring us back to a good place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-17-2016, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,335,750 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raven_on_a_Coyote View Post
You still appear to be hanging crape to no good end. The original article and the NY Times article on which it was based are two years old. There has actually been some progress since then.

It is likely that there will need to be some large adjustments in the usage of western water. It is more complex politically than it is in reality. The problem deals more with western water law than with the realities of water. For instance CA growers buy water for unbelievably low prices. Simply creating a surcharge on water use including a buyout of rights for those who have them could alleviate much if not all of the Colorado River problem.

To a large degree it is CA that creates and perpetuates the problem via western water law. The CA growers have always had a legal right to far more water than is actually available. The Colorado River Compact was really a negotiation to more fairly divide the water. But they actually allocated more than was available. The one who got screwed worse was actually Mexico abut it is unlikely any US administration will want to fix that. And CA is still the big gorilla with its immense population and pull in the Federal government.

Even today it is likely possible to save a great deal of water by reducing the area while increasing the depth of the reservoirs. Has implications on power production but could probably be managed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2016, 03:28 PM
 
16,393 posts, read 30,261,314 times
Reputation: 25501
Quote:
Originally Posted by :-D View Post
Part of me hopes the drought gets worse to discourage others from moving here. Leave it for the people who don't mind taking short showers and have no need for a grass yard. Sick of people moving to Arizona and trying to make it something it isn't. Maybe it'll scare the retirees into Florida and stop some of our endless sprawl and UHI which actually does affect our precipitation a little bit. Sick of people moving here for usually cheap housing and no snow and no humidity and then complaining about everything Arizona offers. It makes Arizona look like a used diaper in comparison to the rest of the country, we should have residents who are proud to live here, not necessarily to the level of Texans but it shouldn't be an overwhelming amount of residents who think the state is crap. These transplants have been a stain on Arizona and Phoenix in particular, they have changed Arizona into a hot, republican Midwest state and it will never be back to the way it used to be. But when the drought does get worse, and it will, all these transplants will go back to the lives they left behind with zero guilt in contributing to what Arizona will become and leave us with hundreds maybe even thousands of empty homes and a broken economy. Phoenix will be a Detroit 2.0. Meanwhile some of us natives, who have had our entire lives entrenched in this state will be screwed trying to bring us back to a good place.

It is not the Midwesterns who are trying to grow alfalfa and other grain crops in the desert.
Or place green lawns in the old established neighborhoods of Phoenix.

Or have the 3 gallon per flush toilets that are prevalent in many public buildings in Tucson - I thought those went away in the 1990s. The plumbing in much of this state is 20-30 years behind.

Or are diverting water to mine LOW-GRADE copper ore around the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2016, 03:39 PM
 
Location: Tucson, AZ
119 posts, read 126,458 times
Reputation: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by :-D View Post
This.

Also OP, counties vary on how much they rely on the CAP. Some of the far northern counties for an example are almost 100% reliant on the CAP. Phoenix and Tucson less so.

Part of me hopes the drought gets worse to discourage others from moving here. Leave it for the people who don't mind taking short showers and have no need for a grass yard. Sick of people moving to Arizona and trying to make it something it isn't. .
On people moving here and making this land something it is not: One word for you: Yavapai

And I am sure that i use less water than 97% of the people in Arizona.

In part I posted this do people have some reality of the challenges that are facing the southwest. Climate change is causing not only drought but faster evaporation of surface water from the Colorado river basin. If there was no climate change I would not be as chatty about all this.

But where are all those people in the area going to move and work in the 100% CAP areas if the water stops? There are already cities in AZ where the taps have gone dry. It will take politics and money to manage all this change, and AZ does not have either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2016, 04:27 PM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,953,154 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raven_on_a_Coyote View Post
On people moving here and making this land something it is not: One word for you: Yavapai

And I am sure that i use less water than 97% of the people in Arizona.

In part I posted this do people have some reality of the challenges that are facing the southwest. Climate change is causing not only drought but faster evaporation of surface water from the Colorado river basin. If there was no climate change I would not be as chatty about all this.

But where are all those people in the area going to move and work in the 100% CAP areas if the water stops? There are already cities in AZ where the taps have gone dry. It will take politics and money to manage all this change, and AZ does not have either.
But you're getting a little ahead of yourself and calling for doomsday. The taps aren't running dry and we have an extensive infastructure in place. I dabble in water law, it's fascinating.

Baby steps. For example Phoenix uses less water today than it did in the 50s when it was sustained via Salt River alone.

Right now we're at only the preliminary stages.

If you want to know a real threat I'll post about it when I have the info infront of me. But it's about Navajo Nation and their unsubstantiated rights to significant amounts of the Colorado River. It's called Practical Irrigable Acreage. It's a federal issue granting water rights to tribes. They have a lot of land that is practicably Irrigable, and the right to the water is determined on that standard. It hasn't yet been determined exactly how much that entails, but it's a lot and unaccounted for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2016, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Tucson, AZ
119 posts, read 126,458 times
Reputation: 222
Is the water use in Pheonix lower per capita or lower in total. It could be lower per capita but we are using a lot more water.

Also, the taps have run dry in one area for a short time:
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/...ures/84597626/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2016, 04:41 PM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,953,154 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raven_on_a_Coyote View Post
Is the water use in Pheonix lower per capita or lower in total. It could be lower per capita but we are using a lot more water.

Also, the taps have run dry in one area for a short time:
Arizona utility regulators spar over emergency water measures
Total use, it's the result of replacing farmland with housing. Agriculture uses substantially more than residential plats, this city used to be very green.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2016, 05:17 PM
 
Location: Bordentown
1,705 posts, read 1,599,437 times
Reputation: 2533
Why not import water from Texas (Houston area) to relieve their flooding and help states which need water?
I've heard it's too expensive but wouldn't bringing water from the ocean or Mexico as that article states be just as expensive, if not more? Also, isn't desalination extremely toxic? At least the water coming from high flood areas isn't as salinated and can be purified...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2016, 05:18 PM
 
Location: Tucson, AZ
119 posts, read 126,458 times
Reputation: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGMotorsport64 View Post
Total use, it's the result of replacing farmland with housing. Agriculture uses substantially more than residential plats, this city used to be very green.
Sorry, according to this total water use is the same since 1957
Arizona's Water Use Has Remained The Same Since The 1950s | KJZZ

And according to this the total water use for Tucson as a whole is higher.
https://wrrc.arizona.edu/sites/wrrc....les/Tenney.pdf

I can find no data for historical Pheonix water use.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2016, 05:22 PM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,953,154 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raven_on_a_Coyote View Post
Sorry, according to this total water use is the same since 1957
Arizona's Water Use Has Remained The Same Since The 1950s | KJZZ

And according to this the total water use for Tucson as a whole is higher.
https://wrrc.arizona.edu/sites/wrrc....les/Tenney.pdf

I can find no data for historical Pheonix water use.
So the same since 1957 by one source. That's with millions more people and no CAP. I can tell you by some measures it's even less. You gotta understand the history of this area first.

Tucson is another animal and a problem onto itself. It would struggle more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top