Sheriff Joe Arpaio Planning Senate Run In 2018 (camps, law)

[Hschlick84]

Originally Posted by DetroitN8V

Who cares about polygamy? If you want ten wives, have at it.

Arpaio has disrespected the Constitution, taken advantage of the tax payers and is a convicted criminal. What has this woman done that is more harmful? Before you say it, being a Muslim does not make her an extremist.

Working for an organization called CAIR that had people with terror links, you can figure it out for yourself. I'm not going to hold your hand and walk you through it step by step.

[DetroitN8V]

Originally Posted by Hschlick84

Working for an organization called CAIR that had people with terror links, you can figure it out for yourself. I'm not going to hold your hand and walk you through it step by step.

Maybe they’re both wackos. What’s your point? I can’t call a wacko a wacko without naming all wackos? Why was she brought up? Just a random deflection?

[Hschlick84]

Originally Posted by DetroitN8V

Maybe they’re both wackos. What’s your point? I can’t call a wacko a wacko without naming all wackos? Why was she brought up? Just a random deflection?

What's my point? That the Republican party isn't the only side of the spectrum with lunatics since this is an Arpaio thread.

[DetroitN8V]

Originally Posted by Hschlick84

What's my point? That the Republican party isn't the only side of the spectrum with lunatics since this is an Arpaio thread.

No one has argued otherwise.

[chiatldal]

Originally Posted by Hschlick84

So who is the extremist clown running on the left? Deedra Abbound?

I can tell you she's a joke of a candidate more so than the 'extremist' on the right. Look DetroitN8V, you're a Democrat, there's no reason to hide or deny it whether you say you're moderate.

What is "extreme" about her?......

If she Muslim her being Muslim would not make her an 'extremist'

Only if she hated non Muslims would make her an extremist which you have no evince of,

How ever hating her simply because she could be Muslim, or assuming she is a 'extremist' just because she's Muslim, is extremist behavior.

So let look at this

Joe Arpaio a guy not only accuses by converted over discrimination and profiling. again a guy who would be in jail if not do a conventional pardon.

Ex-Sheriff Joe Arpaio Convicted Of Criminal Contempt

Deedra Abbound does not have a criminal record, and has a history Working to bring people together.

Again it's interesting...... So not only are you trying to justify supporting someone with extremist behavior, your trying create a false equivalency with no grounds to it.

[man4857]

I miss the days where we had pragmatist politicians running for office... I think Kasich is probably the last of that. The rest are ideologues.

[chiatldal]

Originally Posted by Hschlick84

What's my point? That the Republican party isn't the only side of the spectrum with lunatics since this is an Arpaio thread.

Extreme left would be people preaching violence and lets over throw the gov..... not the people preaching peace and lets come together.... And this something that a lot on the right don't understand......

Every society was a left and right,

but two different societies right wings conflict with east other.

example Islam extremist is not liberal, An Islam extremist is right wing. It's islam far right wing.

While there are extremist of the left, it's less common because it often contradicts the left views itself.

So The error a lot on the right make want false equivalency between actual bigots on the right and tree hunger on left .

Another error a lot on the right is history history to tend praise people doing good deeds, a look negatively upon those who do bad.

Understand the people holding the signs were the right wing of that age, and MLK and etc were the left.

The flaw is the people holding these signs thought of themselves as good, and MLK as evil.


http://www.ducksters.com/history/civ..._rock_nine.jpg

So where does this look familiar..... the people supporting Joe Arpaio are like people who would had supported George Wallace. Extreme antipathy a disconnect from understanding they supporting is wrong because want it be right, then try make a false equivalency to try justify there choices.

[Ro2113]

Originally Posted by man4857

I miss the days where we had pragmatist politicians running for office... I think Kasich is probably the last of that. The rest are ideologues.

Nah, the guy that's leaving your senate Jeff Flake is a better example. I agree with you though.

[jgustav]

Originally Posted by chiatldal

Extreme left would be people preaching violence and lets over throw the gov..... not the people preaching peace and lets come together.... And this something that a lot on the right don't understand......

Every society was a left and right,

but two different societies right wings conflict with east other.

example Islam extremist is not liberal, An Islam extremist is right wing. It's islam far right wing.

While there are extremist of the left, it's less common because it often contradicts the left views itself.

So The error a lot on the right make want false equivalency between actual bigots on the right and tree hunger on left .

Another error a lot on the right is history history to tend praise people doing good deeds, a look negatively upon those who do bad.

Understand the people holding the signs were the right wing of that age, and MLK and etc were the left.

The flaw is the people holding these signs thought of themselves as good, and MLK as evil.


http://www.ducksters.com/history/civ..._rock_nine.jpg

So where does this look familiar..... the people supporting Joe Arpaio are like people who would had supported George Wallace. Extreme antipathy a disconnect from understanding they supporting is wrong because want it be right, then try make a false equivalency to try justify there choices.

There are a lot of issues with what you have posted here. For the record, I am not a supporter of Arpaio and believe he has virtually no chance of winning a Senate primary in AZ.
The Little Rock Nine were nine black students that were attempting to enter Little Rock Central high school and initially block by the Governor of Arkansas Orval Faubus, a Democrat. They eventually were allow to enter after intervention by the Republican President Eisenhower. The people in the picture holding signs were not the right wing of that age, they were likely Democrats supporting their Governor. I don't even know what your definition is of the right wing, is it limited government conservatives or is it another minimal fringe group that neither party wants to represent? George Wallace was also part of the Democrat party, there is no connection to Republicans who support Arpaio and his hard line immigration views. There was no mass conversion of southern Democrats to the Republican party after the Civil Rights act, below is a link describing this.
https://libertyunyielding.com/2016/0...-civil-rights/

[drjonsnow]

Originally Posted by chiatldal

The levels of irony in this post, trump is the one in power, he is the one lying and attacking the free press.

Hitler's message was fear mongering hate speech about minorities.

Then trying to discredit the free press.

Politicians and the media should not be allowed to utter Hitler like propaganda with impunity or we will soon be in the 4th Reich. Go look at the Potus Trump fake news awards these news people have been speaking lying propaganda to the American people.
How do you think the German people came to believe Hitler's lies? They were fed propaganda by the corrupted media and politicians long enough to get them believe lies.
/[/url]
https://www.gop.com/the-highly-antic...e-news-awards/

Propaganda by liberal politicians and the liberal media need to be EXPOSED and REJECTED or we will end up in the 4th reich !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.gop.com/the-highly-antic...e-news-awards/