Rep. Paul Mosley (LD5) pulled over for speeding claims legislative immunity (cars, driving)

[DetroitN8V]

Originally Posted by teddyearp

I never said you bragged about nor even mentioned driving over 100 mph. Those are your words, not mine. So your wait will be a very long one. I'm thinking about a thread from probably two or more years ago. You talked about your aggressive driving in it. Lane changes maybe?

No clue. Weird how you’re interested in discussing me rather than the topic at hand. What’s your point exactly?

[JGMotorsport64]

Ducey Puts Brakes on Legislative Immunity for Speeding Lawmakers | Phoenix New Times

[Bondurant]

Originally Posted by JGMotorsport64

Ducey Puts Brakes on Legislative Immunity for Speeding Lawmakers | Phoenix New Times

This is a good start but Ducey should also publicly request Mosley resign.

[Bondurant]

Mosley is out of control. Skipped his court hearing. Warrant issued for his arrest. No more politics. Ducey must demand his resignation.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news...ty/1286571002/

[Adamson865]

Originally Posted by Bondurant

Ducey must demand his resignation.

Why specifically Ducey? He's the Governor but he's not the boss of the Legislature.

[KurtAZ]

He was voted out anyway...why request his resignation?

[DetroitN8V]

Originally Posted by KurtAZ

He was voted out anyway...why request his resignation?

Because this nut job has proven himself unfit to legislate and is still in office until the end of his term.

[FirebirdCamaro1220]

It reminds me of the end of Lethal Weapon 2

"Diplomatic Immunity!"

(Bloom)

"It's just been revoked!"

Lol

[LTU2]

Originally Posted by Dwatted Wabbit

The framers of the U.S. Constitution recognized the fundamental necessity of protecting members of Congress from arbitrary arrest. While U.S. Constitution Article I, section 6 placed some restrictions on the police or justice to arrest or detain legislators during a legislative session, its protections did not apply to situations involving "treason, felony or breach of the peace." Most state constitutions contain similar provisions.

The "Arrest" mentioned there concerns arrest on the Civil Process only and includes any offense even not mentioned.

Ohio's is; Privilege from arrest;

Lawriter - ORC - 2331.11 Privilege from arrest.

It even includes church goers, to and from, except this ONLY applies to arrest on the Civil Process, not any other crime/offense/,etc.

[Adamson865]

Originally Posted by DetroitN8V

Because this nut job has proven himself unfit to legislate and is still in office until the end of his term.

For speeding and trying to get out of a ticket? Puhleeze - If that's the criteria for holding elective office, the only qualified candidates will be women over 85 who need a boost to see over the steering wheel of their '63 Fairlane (which, of course, they bought new and still has the original whitewall tires)