Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Asia
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-22-2015, 04:44 PM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,919,738 times
Reputation: 11790

Advertisements

On another thread, I was discussing about Filipino's previous territorial association with the US, and why they decided to split and not my island, Puerto Rico. PR and the Philippines were in political union with the US since 1898, but the Philippines voted for independence, while Puerto Rico did not. So, what were the circumstances back then, and what are people's feelings now? As a native born Puerto Rican, part of me wants the Philippines to "come back" into the family.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-22-2015, 06:28 PM
 
Location: Elysium
12,383 posts, read 8,136,596 times
Reputation: 9194
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
On another thread, I was discussing about Filipino's previous territorial association with the US, and why they decided to split and not my island, Puerto Rico. PR and the Philippines were in political union with the US since 1898, but the Philippines voted for independence, while Puerto Rico did not. So, what were the circumstances back then, and what are people's feelings now? As a native born Puerto Rican, part of me wants the Philippines to "come back" into the family.
The circumstances? Being occupied by Imperial Japan and being part of the liberation fight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2015, 07:06 PM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,919,738 times
Reputation: 11790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taiko View Post
The circumstances? Being occupied by Imperial Japan and being part of the liberation fight.
What does Japan have anything to do with it? You're basically saying, if Japan never invaded the Philippines, then the Philippines would be part of the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2015, 07:29 PM
 
Location: Elysium
12,383 posts, read 8,136,596 times
Reputation: 9194
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
What does Japan have anything to do with it? You're basically saying, if Japan never invaded the Philippines, then the Philippines would be part of the US.
If Puerto Rico was invaded by Germany and they had guerrillas as well as armies in the field to beat Germany back come 1946 independence would have been more likely and more highly pushed then a few trying to kill President Truman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2015, 09:20 PM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,919,738 times
Reputation: 11790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taiko View Post
If Puerto Rico was invaded by Germany and they had guerrillas as well as armies in the field to beat Germany back come 1946 independence would have been more likely and more highly pushed then a few trying to kill President Truman.
Ah, I get the analogy now. So if it weren't for Japan, the Philippines could have probably been a state for all we know. hell, with so many of you guys living here, might as well be a state
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2015, 08:18 AM
 
Location: Elysium
12,383 posts, read 8,136,596 times
Reputation: 9194
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Ah, I get the analogy now. So if it weren't for Japan, the Philippines could have probably been a state for all we know. hell, with so many of you guys living here, might as well be a state
Not likely after the Spanish American War the Filipinos lost an insurgency to the US going for statehood was never an option. Fighting and having the theatre commander pushing for their independence just accelerated the pace as WWII did for other social and political changes worldwide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2015, 09:37 AM
 
530 posts, read 820,596 times
Reputation: 632
In January 1933 the US passed the Hare-Hawes-Cutting Act, a bill that promised independence to the Philippines in ten years. It was superseded by the Tydings-McDuffie Act, that Filipino leadership preferred. Filipinos had lobbied for independence for years before that and there were also powerful interests inside the United States that were against holding on to the Philippines for their own reasons. World War II actually caused a delay in Philippine independence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2015, 09:44 AM
 
530 posts, read 820,596 times
Reputation: 632
Among the interests inside the US that supported Philippine independence were farmers who feared competition from the Philippines and racists who were worried about non-white people coming to the country. Hawaii was already had a large Filipino population and the west coast had a growing Filipino population. Afterwards the same Asian exclusion rules that applied to the rest of Asia also applied to the Philippines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2015, 01:12 PM
 
1,392 posts, read 2,132,808 times
Reputation: 984
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taiko View Post
Not likely after the Spanish American War the Filipinos lost an insurgency to the US going for statehood was never an option. Fighting and having the theatre commander pushing for their independence just accelerated the pace as WWII did for other social and political changes worldwide.
The Americans butchered the Filipinos during that insurgency the same way the Japanese butchered them during WWII. I wonder why the US never apologized for it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2015, 12:02 AM
 
3,437 posts, read 3,284,294 times
Reputation: 2508
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
On another thread, I was discussing about Filipino's previous territorial association with the US, and why they decided to split and not my island, Puerto Rico. PR and the Philippines were in political union with the US since 1898, but the Philippines voted for independence, while Puerto Rico did not. So, what were the circumstances back then, and what are people's feelings now? As a native born Puerto Rican, part of me wants the Philippines to "come back" into the family.
the circumstances are just different. so much blood had been spilled in the quest for independence since 15th century that the patriots would not settle for just a commonwealth.

this is the difference. in Asia, only Philippines and Vietnam fought for their independence. India, Malaysia, Singapore got theirs because their colonial masters gave it to them..

for the Philippines, it took 380 years to kick out foreign invaders only to be subjugated by the local elites

what an irony
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Asia

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top