U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Asia
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-11-2019, 12:53 AM
 
621 posts, read 382,154 times
Reputation: 145

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by manolopo View Post
The Green Cities Index was published in 2011, and that was the only time it was published. So most of the info is a decade old already, and it hasnt been updated year after year like the indexes I post. How about more recent information? I already posted them. Also, if you believe the Green Cities Index, then you should also believe the Economists Liveability Index because they research was conducted by the same company- the Economist Intelligence Unit
So you dont believe that the quality of life in Manila is better, even though the same organization you posted shows that it is better? Manila is ranked 103, Jakarta is ranked 119
Bangkok ranks 98th in EIU Global Liveability Index


The difference between this info and the one you posted is that this info is from 2018, while the one you posted is from 2011. But they're both published by the same company.
Not to mention, the information he posted was a Facebook backpackers survey which can be subject to more bias and prejudice. While the one you posted is a study with ample and concrete methodology. Maybe Jakarta was not included on that survey as it isn't a tourist backpacker city afterall. I'm pretty sure Koh Samui, Bangkok and Phuket are better than Jakarta which are all included on that survey.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-11-2019, 12:58 AM
 
95 posts, read 20,718 times
Reputation: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by neMarL View Post
Not to mention, the information he posted was a Facebook backpackers survey which can be subject to more bias and prejudice. While the one you posted is a study with ample and concrete methodology. Maybe Jakarta was not included on that survey as it isn't a tourist backpacker city afterall. I'm pretty sure Koh Samui, Bangkok and Phuket are better than Jakarta which are all included on that survey.
Maybe they not mention Jakarta as worst city

Meanwhile Manila top worst city in survey, congratz
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 01:04 AM
 
387 posts, read 101,717 times
Reputation: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Pagpag View Post
Maybe they not mention Jakarta as worst city

Meanwhile Manila top worst city in survey, congratz

yeah because 17 people really determine the worst city. That's less than a typical City Data poll. You dont see me citing City Data polls to prove a point. How about actual research?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 01:13 AM
 
95 posts, read 20,718 times
Reputation: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by manolopo View Post
yeah because 17 people really determine the worst city. That's less than a typical City Data poll. You dont see me citing City Data polls to prove a point. How about actual research?
Yeah because you Pinoy can't reply my previous question with actual research!
What u can do just cherry picking some aspect to make ur city look better, But in overall u are behind! pathetic!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 01:17 AM
 
387 posts, read 101,717 times
Reputation: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Pagpag View Post
The difference is u just repeating cherry picking some aspect and cant accept it in overall u behind Jakarta?

can u proof it with those all pointless data ur city attract more visitor?
more rich?
give more impact to global stage?

How is it cherrypicking to point out that the index you posted is nearly a decade old and hasnt been updated since then? I believe the data is correct for a decade ago, but how can we say it's correct for today if it hasnt been updated? Also, you're cherry-picking because you cant admit that Manila has a higher quality of life, even though you post information from the exact same company that says Manila has a higher quality of life. So you want to believe some of what they say and ignore other parts? Even though the quality of life data is from last year?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 01:19 AM
 
95 posts, read 20,718 times
Reputation: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by manolopo View Post
How is it cherrypicking to point out that the index you posted is nearly a decade old and hasnt been updated since then? I believe the data is correct for a decade ago, but how can we say it's correct for today if it hasnt been updated? Also, you're cherry-picking because you cant admit that Manila has a higher quality of life, even though you post information from the exact same company that says Manila has a higher quality of life. So you want to believe some of what they say and ignore other parts? Even though the quality of life data is from last year?
Oh please can u prove it with your quality of life ur city can attract more visitor, more rich, more impact to glabl stage?

Ohhh with your quality uf life u cant change the real situation,.. sad PINOY!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 01:26 AM
 
387 posts, read 101,717 times
Reputation: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Pagpag View Post
Oh please can u prove it with your quality of life ur city can attract more visitor, more rich, more impact to glabl stage?

Ohhh with your quality uf life u cant change the real situation,.. sad PINOY!

More rich, more visitors, more global doesn't mean $hit when the quality of life is worse. You can have more money, more visitors, more highways, more malls. I'll take better quality of life. Thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 01:32 AM
 
95 posts, read 20,718 times
Reputation: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by manolopo View Post
More rich, more visitors, more global doesn't mean $hit when the quality of life is worse. You can have more money, more visitors, more highways, more malls. I'll take better quality of life. Thanks!
ok take it,..
we can offer more than walkable + qualty of life story

SAD PINOY
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Wappingers Falls, NY
1,586 posts, read 1,949,511 times
Reputation: 1060
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Pagpag View Post
The difference is u just repeating cherry picking some aspect
Definition of "Cherry picking:" When someone else picks out individual facts that support his argument and undermine mine.

Definition of "Paying attention to detail:" When I pick out individual facts that support my argiment and undermine his.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 10:04 AM
 
95 posts, read 20,718 times
Reputation: 17
Yeah exactly what he can do just playing in percapita, quantity vs quality, and compare small aspect

But he cant prove it in overall aspect and real situation
Pathetic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Asia
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top