Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
haha,You just want to compare other studies that are not relevant to research which can be tested for truth , as in point b. is the most accurate study about structure genetics of Southeast Asia
Ok back to Topic
Those studies are 10 years older than the National Geographic studies and you say that they're accurate?
people with mixed-blooded europe still the highest in Southeast Asian is Singapore because people there are multi-racial even though the majority are Chinese. in Indonesia people are more varied in phenotypes and not all have the same looks, although Indonesians generally is descend from austroasiatic and austronesian even more to east is melanesians .
many even say that the Indonesians are the most diverse groups in south east Asia are combinations of Native Indonesian, Chinese, Latina (half Indonesian-Europe), Arab , Melanesia, East Asian. Indonesians are very diverse and phenotype not always the same
No there are more Europeans that live in the Philippines than Singapore. There are 600,000 mostly White American expat in the Philippines and 250,000 Amerasians whereas Singapore has nowhere near that number. There are also no Latinos in Singapore or Indonesia either I would say there are if you proved to be more humble and not hog all ethnic groups as belonging to Indonesia. Anyway you have your own unique ethnicities not available elsewhere like Papuans and Melanesians.
Those studies are 10 years older than the National Geographic studies and you say that they're accurate?
How accurate? the most different from other studies how do you conclude Vietnamese, Papuan or vanuatu has the same gene, only you Filipinos who believe even proud of it
Full Filipinas who I think can pass as Latinas (the common mestiza type)
yeah,but majority filipinos general it doesn't look like that. interview with the people at streets ( Filipina and Indonesian ) the majority almost similar looks and the difference is language
yeah my experience while on vacation,I went to malaysia,laos and thailand ,they thought i was a locals ,when i'm in vietnam especially Hanoi they always thought i was burmese,cambodian and cham because my skin was dark and my eyes are different from the locals
Let me clarify though that Filipinos are more Amerasian than Euroasian. Most Spanish migration during the 1500s to 1800s came via Mexico and Peru and most Europeans who settled from 1900s onwards were Americans since they colonized the country.
this vidio it is undeniable that Filipino test their DNA and get 99% of the "Austronesian" how you continue to argue
this vidio it is undeniable that Filipino test their DNA and get 99% of the "Austronesian" how you continue to argue
I've noticed that theme too. Almost every Filipino you meet will tell you that they have Spanish blood somewhere in their DNA, some will add a Chinese relative as well.
But the ones I've known who've done the actual DNA tests on themselves, time and time again, find 99%+ filipino
How accurate? the most different from other studies how do you conclude Vietnamese, Papuan or vanuatu has the same gene, only you Filipinos who believe even proud of it
Genetic studies by Applied Biosystems how that 13% Filipino's Y-DNA is Hispanic, 1% Anglo and 1% Indian.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.