Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He didn't. That would hurt his political career. But I still think it's clear he's a "closet atheist" despite "official statements" to the contrary.
Rather doubtful. He may be a closet Deist like the principle founding fathers but he's not an atheist. Of course we Deists are commonly accused of being atheists by ignorant Christians when we - like atheists - use reason, logic and historical/scientific facts to tear apart The Bible and Christian theology.
I don't know if it has been discussed here before but I was just thinking that I would be more comfortable with a professed non believer politician who could come up with good ideas/solutions.
Not that I would vote for somebody just because they were a non believer.
I am sure I have voted for some that were faux believers.
I just find it disturbing that some politicians might be asking for Gods help in problem solving.
No way, not in this current climate. I am really starting to doubt whether anything but a protestant Christian could be elected to high office.
So everyone has said no. Apparently no one read your post, Mythunderstood:
"In a statement issued Monday, the 75-year-old Stark added that, "like our nation's founders, I strongly support the separation of church and state. I look forward to working with the Secular Coalition to stop the promotion of narrow religious beliefs in science, marriage contracts, the military and the provision of social services."
[LEFT]
Read more: Stark's atheist views break political taboo[/LEFT]
Well I meant "no" for President. And I think for most of the country an Atheist couldn't be elected to Congress either. Certainly not down here in the south.
Well I meant "no" for President. And I think for most of the country an Atheist couldn't be elected to Congress either. Certainly not down here in the south.
Certainly not all believers are unintelligent just as not all non believers are intelligent.
So our political system is being manipulated/ chosen by a majority of voters who in the eyes of non believers are being influenced by the church.Does that make any sense or did I not explain it correctly? Also is it a correct assumption that most non believers tend to be liberal or at least lean left?
I am new to this board and honestly have never given much thought about Atheism. I just don't go to church or believe like my mother taught me to.
I just never realized that so many seem to not believe just as I don't believe.
Certainly not all believers are unintelligent just as not all non believers are intelligent.
So our political system is being manipulated/ chosen by a majority of voters who in the eyes of non believers are being influenced by the church.Does that make any sense or did I not explain it correctly? Also is it a correct assumption that most non believers tend to be liberal or at least lean left?
I am new to this board and honestly have never given much thought about Atheism. I just don't go to church or believe like my mother taught me to.
I just never realized that so many seem to not believe just as I don't believe.
Welcome to the forum!
The non believers here have one thing in common. They don't believe in gods. Many are liberal, some are not.
IMHO, we are perceived as liberal or leftist because of a live and let live attitude. I consider myself a moderate.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.