Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil P
It's hard to know what drives people to hold on to beliefs despite so much evidence to the contrary. I think it's kind of like a feedback loop, as more evidence/arguments mount against a persons belief, they dismiss it based off of the I'm right because I have infallible truth and see the world as increasingly hostile towards them, in which case it makes them even less likely to consider another view...
|
I think this even has a name in psychiatry, IIRC it was the backfire effect. When we have a lot of ego / effort / time / money invested in something, demonstrating that something to be factually wrong or unsubstantiated becomes an existential threat -- not just to the person, but to the group that shares their beliefs. Many people will just "double down" as they say and become even more entrenched and utterly resistant to facts.
The best remedy when you're "outed" eventually is to appeal to your commonalities / similarities, to the things that make you part of the same group / club / family / whatever as the person you disagree with. In your case, you're a family member, a loving son or whatever, blood as they say is thicker than water. That you don't believe the same things theologically or existentially or philosophically isn't threatening because you're still good old Phil. Best you can do.
In my case my family deals with my unbelief by saying it's just a misunderstanding or a phase, they know that I'm a good person and so clearly I'll come back to the fold eventually. It's just part of my life journey to them. I allow them to think that.