Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
" Christians scream long and loud when non believers contradict them on the Christian sub forum."
I believe we goddless bastards have been banned from posting atheist stuff there, haven't we?
Well, only kinda/sorta. Nobody has been banned from posting there. Consistent with the owner (Administrator) of this web site's decision to ban proselytizing in this sub-forum, we (four different moderators) agreed that the divinity of God and Jesus was pretty much axiomatic to Christianity, and that we would operate that forum that way. Similarly, there is no Christian proselytizing allowed in the Judaism or Islam forums, and blanket blaming Islam for terrorism is also forbidden.
Godless bastard baby eaters™ can post anywhere they want. WHAT they choose to post in some areas may have to be dealt with, however.
Ah I still remember the day at the Atheist Alliance Conference in Dublin when Richard Dawkins was on camera - a certain poster of this forum went up behind him with his baby while the camera was rolling and loudly said "Mr. Dawkins sir - your lunch is served".
Ah I still remember the day at the Atheist Alliance Conference in Dublin when Richard Dawkins was on camera - a certain poster of this forum went up behind him with his baby while the camera was rolling and loudly said "Mr. Dawkins sir - your lunch is served".
They never aired it alas.
The implication being that atheists are godless baby eaters. Ironically, that very charge was once leveled at Christians.
"Minucius Felix, a third century Latin apologist, gave a lurid account of Christian debauchery which he claims to have derived from Marcus Cornelius Fontero (100-166 c.e.), a Latin rhetor and tutor of Marcus Aurelius."
A young baby is covered over with flour, the object being to deceive the unwary. It is then served before the person to be admitted into the rites. The recruit is urged to inflict blows onto it--they appear to be harmless because of the covering of flour. Thus the baby was killed with wounds that remain unseen and concealed. It is the blood of this infant--I shudder to mention it--it is the blood of this infant that they lick with thirsty lips; these are the limbs they distribute eagerly; this is the victim by which they seal their covenant....
On a special day they gather in a feast with all their children, sisters, mothers--all sexes and all ages. There, flushed with the banquet after such feasting and drinking, they begin to burn with incestuous passions. They provoke a dog tied to the lampstand to leap and bound towards a scrap of food which they have tossed outside of the reach of his chain. By this means the light is overturned and extinguished, and with it common knowledge of their actions; in the shameless dark with unspeakable lust they copulate in random unions, all equally being guilty of incest, some by deed, but everyone by complicity.... [The Octavius of Marcus Minucius Felix, 9.5-6]. (The Christians As The Romans Saw Them, by Robert L. Wilken; p.18-21).
During the early days of American involvement in Vietnam, before the US began to send in massive amounts of combat troops, US aid to the Vietnamese amounted to military advisors and foodstuffs. It was widely reported that the rebels were taking cans of American baby food with pictures of babies on the can, and telling the people that Americans canned and ate babies.
Well, only kinda/sorta. Nobody has been banned from posting there. Consistent with the owner (Administrator) of this web site's decision to ban proselytizing in this sub-forum, we (four different moderators) agreed that the divinity of God and Jesus was pretty much axiomatic to Christianity, and that we would operate that forum that way. Similarly, there is no Christian proselytizing allowed in the Judaism or Islam forums, and blanket blaming Islam for terrorism is also forbidden.
Godless bastard baby eaters™ can post anywhere they want. WHAT they choose to post in some areas may have to be dealt with, however.
Ok Right. Odd that i don't post there anymore. I suppose it's because I get all the action I want here. Oh and by the way, it's Goddless baby -eating bastards (TM) Don't be disrepectful to the babies, when we're eating them
Quote:
Originally Posted by monumentus
Ah I still remember the day at the Atheist Alliance Conference in Dublin when Richard Dawkins was on camera - a certain poster of this forum went up behind him with his baby while the camera was rolling and loudly said "Mr. Dawkins sir - your lunch is served".
They never aired it alas.
Pity. That would have been the most outrageously hilarious thing since John Cleese at Graham Chapman's funeral or Spike Milligan (smiling) calling the future Charles III a "grovelling little bastard".
Ok Right. Odd that i don't post there anymore. I suppose it's because I get all the action I want here. Oh and by the way, it's Goddless baby -eating bastards (TM) Don't be disrepectful to the babies, when we're eating them
Pity. That would have been the most outrageously hilarious thing since John Cleese at Graham Chapman's funeral or Spike Milligan (smiling) calling the future Charles III a "grovelling little bastard".
The implication being that atheists are godless baby eaters. Ironically, that very charge was once leveled at Christians.
"Minucius Felix, a third century Latin apologist, gave a lurid account of Christian debauchery which he claims to have derived from Marcus Cornelius Fontero (100-166 c.e.), a Latin rhetor and tutor of Marcus Aurelius."
A young baby is covered over with flour, the object being to deceive the unwary. It is then served before the person to be admitted into the rites. The recruit is urged to inflict blows onto it--they appear to be harmless because of the covering of flour. Thus the baby was killed with wounds that remain unseen and concealed. It is the blood of this infant--I shudder to mention it--it is the blood of this infant that they lick with thirsty lips; these are the limbs they distribute eagerly; this is the victim by which they seal their covenant....
On a special day they gather in a feast with all their children, sisters, mothers--all sexes and all ages. There, flushed with the banquet after such feasting and drinking, they begin to burn with incestuous passions. They provoke a dog tied to the lampstand to leap and bound towards a scrap of food which they have tossed outside of the reach of his chain. By this means the light is overturned and extinguished, and with it common knowledge of their actions; in the shameless dark with unspeakable lust they copulate in random unions, all equally being guilty of incest, some by deed, but everyone by complicity.... [The Octavius of Marcus Minucius Felix, 9.5-6]. (The Christians As The Romans Saw Them, by Robert L. Wilken; p.18-21).
During the early days of American involvement in Vietnam, before the US began to send in massive amounts of combat troops, US aid to the Vietnamese amounted to military advisors and foodstuffs. It was widely reported that the rebels were taking cans of American baby food with pictures of babies on the can, and telling the people that Americans canned and ate babies.
OMG! That is some seriously sick **** right there! I have to admit that all of that was just TMI unless you totally made it up and in that case you should be writing "Halloween" movies. I admit freely that I have no clue as to whether or not that stuff is true or not because I'm not well read or well anything but dang! Eeeks no wonder I don't want to be chained to such nonsense anymore. It's bad enough that the bible endorses rape and incest right in those pages but it fails to mention little tidbits like that.
LIke I will ALWAYS say, the buy bull was written BY Men, FOR men.
OMG! That is some seriously sick **** right there! I have to admit that all of that was just TMI unless you totally made it up and in that case you should be writing "Halloween" movies. I admit freely that I have no clue as to whether or not that stuff is true or not because I'm not well read or well anything but dang! Eeeks no wonder I don't want to be chained to such nonsense anymore. It's bad enough that the bible endorses rape and incest right in those pages but it fails to mention little tidbits like that.
LIke I will ALWAYS say, the buy bull was written BY Men, FOR men.
No one today really supposes that early Christians ACTUALLY ate babies. These were stories that were in circulation in Roman times, and were almost certainly derived from Christian claims to be eating human flesh and drinking human blood (the body and blood of Jesus-wafer and wine). I am no fan of Christianity, and I think that the Catholic church is one of the most corrupt organizations in history. But even I don't think they are or were actually cannibals.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I believe we goddless bastards have been banned from posting atheist stuff there, haven't we?
WHAT they choose to post in some areas may have to be dealt with, however. 
