Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Atheism and Agnosticism
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-20-2010, 06:58 PM
 
2,994 posts, read 5,769,430 times
Reputation: 1822

Advertisements

The Bible teaches that believers bring God's blessings to even the
unbelievers who live around them. For example, the Lord blessed
Potiphar's entire household because Joseph was placed in charge of it.
Yet, enemies of Christianity, especially secular humanists, almost
never grant that Christians bring blessings to those among whom they
live.

Recently, Guenter Lewy of the University of Massachusetts set out to write a book entitled Why America Doesn't Need Religion. He wanted the book to be "a defense of secular humanism and ethical relativism." Lewy is not a Christian and does not believe in God. But he was determined to offer his results as objectively as possible.

As Lewy assembled his extensive research, he received a surprise. He
found himself forced to conclude that Christianity has a record of
strong support for social justice and human dignity. Other research
forced him to conclude that Christians at that time constantly showed
a lower rate than non Christians of the behaviors associated with
social ills and moral failure. These include divorce, domestic
violence, out of wedlock births, adult crime and juvenile delinquency.
He finally concluded, from other studies, that people who actually
live the Christian life have higher rates of happiness and are
healthier. The final title of his book is Why America Needs
Religion.

Christians should not be fearful about living out their faith, even
among unbelievers. As they live out their faith, God is not only
blessing them, but also the unbelievers who surround them.




References: Charles Colson, "The Gospel according to Jesse: Is
religion a crutch?" Minnesota Christian Chronicle, December 2, 1999, p.
16.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-20-2010, 07:54 PM
 
8,679 posts, read 15,263,675 times
Reputation: 15342
[FONT=Verdana]Thanks, but I'll stick with Bertrand Russell:[/FONT][FONT=Verdana]

I mean by intellectual integrity the habit of deciding vexed questions in accordance with the evidence, or of leaving them undecided where the evidence is inconclusive. This virtue, though it is underestimated by almost all adherents of any system of dogma, is to my mind of the very greatest social importance and far more likely to benefit the world than Christianity or any other system of organized beliefs.


In "Can Religion Cure Our Troubles?" (1954)[/FONT]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2010, 08:08 PM
 
Location: Richland, Washington
4,904 posts, read 6,013,333 times
Reputation: 3533
His research is flawed. Christians have supported slavery. They also have the highest divorce rate in the entire country. The predominately christian bible belt has the highest rate of adultry. The belief that christians have a lower rate of juvenile delinquincy and adult crime/domestic violence is complete nonsense. I attended a reformed christian highschool(you had to be a christian to attend) and there were as many drugs, teen pregnancy, fighting, violence and weapons as all of the public schools did. We also had the biggest drinking problem in the county. That seems to make the idea of christians having a lower rate of juvenile delinquincy to be rather questionable. Also, christians make up 75% of American prison inmates while atheists/agnostics make up less than 1%. If christianity led to less adult crime/domestic violence then christians would make up the least number of inmates. This is to the contrary though. The idea that christians are healthier and happier than unbelievers is rather suspect. There are studies that say that unbelievers are healthier and happier. The truth is that they're both probably about the same.

Last edited by agnostic soldier; 04-20-2010 at 08:57 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2010, 09:27 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,521 posts, read 37,121,123 times
Reputation: 13998
Quote:
Originally Posted by 007.5 View Post
The Bible teaches that believers bring God's blessings to even the
unbelievers who live around them. For example, the Lord blessed
Potiphar's entire household because Joseph was placed in charge of it.
Yet, enemies of Christianity, especially secular humanists, almost
never grant that Christians bring blessings to those among whom they
live.

Recently, Guenter Lewy of the University of Massachusetts set out to write a book entitled Why America Doesn't Need Religion. He wanted the book to be "a defense of secular humanism and ethical relativism." Lewy is not a Christian and does not believe in God. But he was determined to offer his results as objectively as possible.

As Lewy assembled his extensive research, he received a surprise. He
found himself forced to conclude that Christianity has a record of
strong support for social justice and human dignity. Other research
forced him to conclude that Christians at that time constantly showed
a lower rate than non Christians of the behaviors associated with
social ills and moral failure. These include divorce, domestic
violence, out of wedlock births, adult crime and juvenile delinquency.
He finally concluded, from other studies, that people who actually
live the Christian life have higher rates of happiness and are
healthier. The final title of his book is Why America Needs
Religion.

Christians should not be fearful about living out their faith, even
among unbelievers. As they live out their faith, God is not only
blessing them, but also the unbelievers who surround them.




References: Charles Colson, "The Gospel according to Jesse: Is
religion a crutch?" Minnesota Christian Chronicle, December 2, 1999, p.
16.
There is almost as much manure it this post as the one you posted in the R/P forum...The find the truth Charles, one must leave the bias behind before doing the research.

Quote:
The CDC says that southern states, where there is often the greatest emphasis on abstinence and religion, tend to have the highest rates of teenage pregnancy and STDs.

In addition, about 16,000 pregnancies were reported among 10- to 14-year-old girls in 2004 and a similar number of young people in the age group reported having a sexually transmitted disease.
US teen pregnancy and syphilis rates rose sharply during George Bush's presidency, Centres for Disease Control finds | World news | guardian.co.uk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2010, 10:40 PM
 
Location: Richland, Washington
4,904 posts, read 6,013,333 times
Reputation: 3533
I'd also add that if Christianity(or religion in general) is needed to stop/lower the behaviors that you listed then more secular countries like Norway, Britain or Japan would be hell on earth full of people in despair while the U.S is a utopia of happy citizens. This is not so. God fearing America is the worst while Japan is the best. Most people in secular countries also live moral lives of contentment.This doesn't mean that religion necessarily makes a society worse while secularism would automatically make it better.

Last edited by agnostic soldier; 04-20-2010 at 10:53 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2010, 11:56 PM
 
Location: Metromess
11,798 posts, read 25,175,776 times
Reputation: 5219
Quote:
Originally Posted by agnostic soldier View Post
This doesn't mean that religion necessarily makes a society worse while secularism would automatically make it better.
I would say that, all else being equal, it does mean exactly that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2010, 05:28 AM
 
608 posts, read 605,411 times
Reputation: 33
Well, for myself, I would like to know reputable historians who have come to a conclusion, as to whether Christianity in the West has been principally a boon to peoples who came under its influence or a bane, compared to peoples elsewhere which never came under its influence.



Ryrge
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2010, 07:14 AM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,086 posts, read 20,691,451 times
Reputation: 5927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryrge View Post
Well, for myself, I would like to know reputable historians who have come to a conclusion, as to whether Christianity in the West has been principally a boon to peoples who came under its influence or a bane, compared to peoples elsewhere which never came under its influence.



Ryrge
Reputable historians would not put it as simply as that and, even if they did come to conclusion that Christianity had brough more benefits than otherwise to society, that does not do a single thing to show it to be believable. And, in the end, we should believe what is shown to be true, not what is shown to make us feel better or even behave better.

Still. Thanks for popping up on the atheist thread and putting these points. It gets a bit dull here sometimes because the squabbling mainly goes on in the religion/philosophy forum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2010, 08:03 AM
 
2,994 posts, read 5,769,430 times
Reputation: 1822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avienne View Post
Thanks, but I'll stick with Bertrand Russell:

I mean by intellectual integrity the habit of deciding vexed questions in accordance with the evidence, or of leaving them undecided where the evidence is inconclusive. This virtue, though it is underestimated by almost all adherents of any system of dogma, is to my mind of the very greatest social importance and far more likely to benefit the world than Christianity or any other system of organized beliefs.

In "Can Religion Cure Our Troubles?" (1954)
Perhaps Ol Bertrand just didnt want to see the evidence due to his apriori-philiosophical bias ? I think so. You are aware that Atheism is a secular religion of organized beliefs right ? Secular Humanism is seen as a Religion according to our U.S. GOvernment., and even its spokesperson , Prof. Paul Kurtz, stated so. Good to have you aboard as a Religionist. Bertrand was one too . We ALL are .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2010, 08:54 AM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
13,138 posts, read 22,804,086 times
Reputation: 14116
Quote:
Originally Posted by 007.5 View Post
The Bible teaches that believers bring God's blessings to even the
unbelievers who live around them. For example, the Lord blessed
Potiphar's entire household because Joseph was placed in charge of it.
Yet, enemies of Christianity, especially secular humanists, almost
never grant that Christians bring blessings to those among whom they
live.

Recently, Guenter Lewy of the University of Massachusetts set out to write a book entitled Why America Doesn't Need Religion. He wanted the book to be "a defense of secular humanism and ethical relativism." Lewy is not a Christian and does not believe in God. But he was determined to offer his results as objectively as possible.

As Lewy assembled his extensive research, he received a surprise. He
found himself forced to conclude that Christianity has a record of
strong support for social justice and human dignity. Other research
forced him to conclude that Christians at that time constantly showed
a lower rate than non Christians of the behaviors associated with
social ills and moral failure. These include divorce, domestic
violence, out of wedlock births, adult crime and juvenile delinquency.
He finally concluded, from other studies, that people who actually
live the Christian life have higher rates of happiness and are
healthier. The final title of his book is Why America Needs
Religion.

Christians should not be fearful about living out their faith, even
among unbelievers. As they live out their faith, God is not only
blessing them, but also the unbelievers who surround them.




References: Charles Colson, "The Gospel according to Jesse: Is
religion a crutch?" Minnesota Christian Chronicle, December 2, 1999, p.
16.
From a purely scientific view even the most hardcore atheist would have to accept religion has actual real world value or it wouldn't have survived the evolutionary process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Atheism and Agnosticism

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top