U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
 
Old 04-02-2012, 01:15 PM
 
4,028 posts, read 3,257,048 times
Reputation: 2004
Quote:
The interstate systems wasn't built in 10 years
Because the interstate system traverses an entire country. We're only talking about a few miles of rail, it really shouldn't be that complicated.

As has been pointed out, the first transcontinental railroad only took 6 years to build. Sure, they had cheap labor and not many land deals to worry about, but they were also dealing with the technology of 150 years ago!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-02-2012, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Kirkwood
6,863 posts, read 3,410,538 times
Reputation: 1491
Quote:
Because the interstate system traverses an entire country
How long did it take to build I-285? And it was all rural when complete in 1969. We are talking about building a rail line through an already urban area. If we don't start now we doom our kids to chocking traffic congestion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 03:11 PM
 
Location: Marietta, GA
7,652 posts, read 9,283,139 times
Reputation: 3168
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
How long did it take to build I-285? And it was all rural when complete in 1969. We are talking about building a rail line through an already urban area. If we don't start now we doom our kids to chocking traffic congestion.
The entire Interstate system was started under Eisenhower in the late 1950s, and I-285 planning was begun in 1957 with sections opening as they were completed, up to the final segment opening in 1969. It was two lanes in each direction. I can remember sections of I-285 being 3 lanes in each direction around 1980 when I first visited my sister in Dunwoody.

The whole scare tactic about "choking congestion" doesn't take into account the fact that as technology improves and becomes more ubiquitous, there will be less of a need for many folks to drive to an office, or they will do the commute at times other than the static "rush hours" currently in place.

Additionally, even more and more people will need to commute to places other than downtown Atlanta, making a plan to keep building rail to downtown even more of an obsolete idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 07:24 PM
 
397 posts, read 337,629 times
Reputation: 224
Quote:
Originally Posted by neil0311 View Post
The entire Interstate system was started under Eisenhower in the late 1950s, and I-285 planning was begun in 1957 with sections opening as they were completed, up to the final segment opening in 1969. It was two lanes in each direction. I can remember sections of I-285 being 3 lanes in each direction around 1980 when I first visited my sister in Dunwoody.

The whole scare tactic about "choking congestion" doesn't take into account the fact that as technology improves and becomes more ubiquitous, there will be less of a need for many folks to drive to an office, or they will do the commute at times other than the static "rush hours" currently in place.

Additionally, even more and more people will need to commute to places other than downtown Atlanta, making a plan to keep building rail to downtown even more of an obsolete idea.
This is a flawed argument, more and more people are moving into city centers making them more dense which will increase ridership. Also for all we know gas may be $10 a gallon five years from now, what happens then? We can't control the price of gas anymore whatever a buffoon like Gingrich says. Trains and similar infrastructure are an investment for our future.

Out of interest why are other countries investing so much in rail and also some states in the US. Are we smarter in GA and/or know something they don't
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 07:27 PM
 
Location: ATL
4,688 posts, read 3,073,677 times
Reputation: 1804
So what do your local friends think about this bill?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 07:32 PM
 
4,028 posts, read 3,257,048 times
Reputation: 2004
Quote:
Trains and similar infrastructure are an investment for our future.
Some may disagree with this point.

However, I would say that most people will agree with it. My problem with TSPLOST is that it does not do nearly enough for rail. We can do better than adding a few miles here and there and funding yet more studies and land access in a 10 year period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 07:39 PM
 
397 posts, read 337,629 times
Reputation: 224
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLTJL View Post
Some may disagree with this point.

However, I would say that most people will agree with it. My problem with TSPLOST is that it does not do nearly enough for rail. We can do better than adding a few miles here and there and funding yet more studies and land access in a 10 year period.
Yep agreed this bill doesn't do enough. But look at who we are dealing with...........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 07:46 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA (Brookhaven)
1,062 posts, read 563,537 times
Reputation: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLTJL View Post
Some may disagree with this point.

However, I would say that most people will agree with it. My problem with TSPLOST is that it does not do nearly enough for rail. We can do better than adding a few miles here and there and funding yet more studies and land access in a 10 year period.
Well I would have paid 2% for a $12 billion bill that included more rail, but that's just me. That would have hurt the chances not helped it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 07:48 PM
 
4,028 posts, read 3,257,048 times
Reputation: 2004
If $9 billion isn't enough to fund some decent rail, what is?

Do they need $1 trillion? More? I don't even know what number comes after a trillion!

I don't think it sends the right message to support half-baked legislation. Either do it right, or don't do it at all.

If you come back and ask for a nickel tax that will fund widespread rail expansion all over the metro, then I'll support you all the way. But don't come asking for a penny so a few doctors and researchers have an easier time getting to the CDC and Emory and people can go a few miles further up GA 400.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 07:58 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA (Brookhaven)
1,062 posts, read 563,537 times
Reputation: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLTJL View Post
If $9 billion isn't enough to fund some decent rail, what is?

Do they need $1 trillion? More? I don't even know what number comes after a trillion!

I don't think it sends the right message to support half-baked legislation. Either do it right, or don't do it at all.

If you come back and ask for a nickel tax that will fund widespread rail expansion all over the metro, then I'll support you all the way. But don't come asking for a penny so a few doctors and researchers have an easier time getting to the CDC and Emory and people can go a few miles further up GA 400.
That's $3 billion more than this will provide. Yes you could fund some decent rail with $3 billion more.

And no one is going to vote for a 5% sales tax increase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2011 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $79,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top