Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-09-2014, 09:36 AM
 
445 posts, read 512,844 times
Reputation: 280

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
Sounds like wishful thinking.

I don't see anything that indicates the administration is moving in the right direction. APS may be better. It may be worse. Gentrification doesn't mean the people necessarily send their kids to the local public school. Sometimes they just move when they get to elementary or middle school.
I think that's true in some cases, but there's a significant percentage of the people who live in these SE Atlanta neighborhoods who will resist moving to the suburbs for better schools because they like living intown and don't see themselves as suburb residents. Also there are a lot of people who just can't afford private school in addition to a mortgage payment. And once the school reaches a critical mass of kids from affluent and educated families, more and more such people will want to send their kids there. Oakhurst Elementary is an example of a school that underwent a dramatic demographic change in a very short period of time. In 2003 the FRL population was like 75%; last year it was like 14%. I know the situation in COD is different than in Atlanta, but the change has been dramatic nonetheless. I just think the increased preference for city living among a certain segment of the population bodes well for APS, the faults of its administration notwithstanding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-09-2014, 05:21 PM
 
16,633 posts, read 29,310,669 times
Reputation: 7555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dkeating View Post
I think that's true in some cases, but there's a significant percentage of the people who live in these SE Atlanta neighborhoods who will resist moving to the suburbs for better schools because they like living intown and don't see themselves as suburb residents. Also there are a lot of people who just can't afford private school in addition to a mortgage payment. And once the school reaches a critical mass of kids from affluent and educated families, more and more such people will want to send their kids there. Oakhurst Elementary is an example of a school that underwent a dramatic demographic change in a very short period of time. In 2003 the FRL population was like 75%; last year it was like 14%. I know the situation in COD is different than in Atlanta, but the change has been dramatic nonetheless. I just think the increased preference for city living among a certain segment of the population bodes well for APS, the faults of its administration notwithstanding.
Most of the shifting in Oakhurst's demographics was due to a major rezoning that took place in the City Schools of Decatur in 2004.

Westchester was closed--converted to admin offices.

Glennwood was converted to a Grade 4/5 Academy...city-wide.

College Heights was converted to an early childhood learning center.

Fifth Avenue was already technically closed and had merged with Oakhurst a few years prior to 2004.

Clairemont, Oakhurst, and Winnona Park became K-3 schools.

Westchester's former district was divided between Oakhurst and Clairemont.

Glennwood's former district was divided between Clairemont and Winnona Park.

Some of Winnona Park's former district was shifted to Oakhurst.

College Heights's former district was divided between Winnona Park and Oakhurst.


^^^^
This is what happened in 2004. It caused major school population change. It really opened the door for the Oakhurst neighborhood to gentrify extremely rapidly. Oakhurst went from less than 10% white to nearly 50% white in one school year.

Since this time, Glennwood was repurposed as a K-3 school, Westchester will re-open as a K-3 school in August 2014, and the 4/5 Academy has been moved to a refurbished Fifth Avenue School. The district boundaries have all changed a few times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2014, 06:43 PM
 
445 posts, read 512,844 times
Reputation: 280
Quote:
Originally Posted by aries4118 View Post
Most of the shifting in Oakhurst's demographics was due to a major rezoning that took place in the City Schools of Decatur in 2004.

Westchester was closed--converted to admin offices.

Glennwood was converted to a Grade 4/5 Academy...city-wide.

College Heights was converted to an early childhood learning center.

Fifth Avenue was already technically closed and had merged with Oakhurst a few years prior to 2004.

Clairemont, Oakhurst, and Winnona Park became K-3 schools.

Westchester's former district was divided between Oakhurst and Clairemont.

Glennwood's former district was divided between Clairemont and Winnona Park.

Some of Winnona Park's former district was shifted to Oakhurst.

College Heights's former district was divided between Winnona Park and Oakhurst.


^^^^
This is what happened in 2004. It caused major school population change. It really opened the door for the Oakhurst neighborhood to gentrify extremely rapidly. Oakhurst went from less than 10% white to nearly 50% white in one school year.

Since this time, Glennwood was repurposed as a K-3 school, Westchester will re-open as a K-3 school in August 2014, and the 4/5 Academy has been moved to a refurbished Fifth Avenue School. The district boundaries have all changed a few times.
Definitely. So Oakhurst probably isn't a great analogy, but I think it's possible that the Drew waitlist being full will serve as a catalyst for people to send their kids to Toomer who weren't going to before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2014, 08:24 PM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,709,235 times
Reputation: 5702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dkeating View Post
Definitely. So Oakhurst probably isn't a great analogy, but I think it's possible that the Drew waitlist being full will serve as a catalyst for people to send their kids to Toomer who weren't going to before.
People send their kids to Toomer, waiting to be accepted to Drew. There is a huge drop in students at 4 & 5. But Drew is full so parents are starting to band together and working to improve the middle schools. Something similar happened at Inman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2014, 09:41 PM
 
2,411 posts, read 2,763,299 times
Reputation: 2027
Quote:
Originally Posted by aries4118 View Post
Most of the shifting in Oakhurst's demographics was due to a major rezoning that took place in the City Schools of Decatur in 2004.

Westchester was closed--converted to admin offices.

Glennwood was converted to a Grade 4/5 Academy...city-wide.

College Heights was converted to an early childhood learning center.

Fifth Avenue was already technically closed and had merged with Oakhurst a few years prior to 2004.

Clairemont, Oakhurst, and Winnona Park became K-3 schools.

Westchester's former district was divided between Oakhurst and Clairemont.

Glennwood's former district was divided between Clairemont and Winnona Park.

Some of Winnona Park's former district was shifted to Oakhurst.

College Heights's former district was divided between Winnona Park and Oakhurst.


^^^^
This is what happened in 2004. It caused major school population change. It really opened the door for the Oakhurst neighborhood to gentrify extremely rapidly. Oakhurst went from less than 10% white to nearly 50% white in one school year.

Since this time, Glennwood was repurposed as a K-3 school, Westchester will re-open as a K-3 school in August 2014, and the 4/5 Academy has been moved to a refurbished Fifth Avenue School. The district boundaries have all changed a few times.
Could similar "creative zoning" be having an effect in O4W?--Are there significant numbers of folks considering the area because it is now zoned for Inman Middle and Grady HS? I am sure that the areas no longer zoned for Grady and Inman lost value, but parts of O4W are approaching values similar to areas that are considered good K-12.--that has to be a net gain for the city. I know the area was trending up before the rezone--but is the rezone part of the meteoric rise? Just asking...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2014, 10:18 PM
 
16,633 posts, read 29,310,669 times
Reputation: 7555
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeoff View Post
Could similar "creative zoning" be having an effect in O4W?--Are there significant numbers of folks considering the area because it is now zoned for Inman Middle and Grady HS? I am sure that the areas no longer zoned for Grady and Inman lost value, but parts of O4W are approaching values similar to areas that are considered good K-12.--that has to be a net gain for the city. I know the area was trending up before the rezone--but is the rezone part of the meteoric rise? Just asking...
Perhaps. But the I think the effect is more pronounced when it happens at the elementary level.

You would see a major change in O4W if Hope-Hill and Mary Lin, or Hope-Hill and Springdale Park combined zones where one school became K-2 and the other 3-5. This has been bandied about a few times in the not-too-distant past.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2014, 06:09 AM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
1,050 posts, read 1,682,917 times
Reputation: 498
I have to agree I wouldn't send my own child to a school with those ratings. Maybe it is improving, but I don't experiment with my children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top