Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-14-2015, 05:37 AM
 
Location: O4W
3,744 posts, read 4,763,439 times
Reputation: 2076

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by demonta4 View Post
Which is why I said Express Service. They can have busses that serve major roads and then takes the interstate to a train station. They certainly aren't going to fund an HRT or extensive bus line down there.
All im saying is in the next 15 years that the metro is going to gain close to 3 million people. All those people cant fit ITP and on the northside. HC is looking ahead. They know they can get a good portion of those people that will be moving here. Plus they have plenty of undeveloped land to build on for more tax revenue. The only bad part is HC is far away from most of the jobs ITP. Most people will be like "HC is cool but it is too far from my job in Dunwoody/etc" and HC can counter that by saying "Just take MARTA" People in HC will drive to Downtown/Midtown for work but once you go north from Buckhead on up people generally do not want to drive that far to work from HC. That guy is just doing what anyone with a little common sense should be doing and that is to join our regional transportation network. If people want to think MARTA will not benefit HC then so be it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-14-2015, 05:57 AM
 
Location: O4W
3,744 posts, read 4,763,439 times
Reputation: 2076
No disrespect to anyone on here but thinking that HC doesn't need rail service is "country bumpkin" thinking as a Ny'er would say. There are plenty of places outside of DC and NYC that have commuter rail to the city. I'm sure you all would prefer for HC residents to ride a horse to work every morning but we have to think for the future
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 06:09 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,731,164 times
Reputation: 5702
This may not become a reality, but it shows MARTA is making good decisions and changing it's reputation. County leaders now see that MARTA is a good steward of public money and transit provides another layer of transportation and economic development.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 07:53 AM
 
142 posts, read 167,004 times
Reputation: 194
OMG, ride a horse to work, that made me LOL. I think people from Henry would drive to Clayton to hop on a train to the northside, but they would not want it running to the county. Much of the county is rural and undeveloped (one of the many things I love about it is its wide open spaces). It think MARTA's money would be better spent in Clayton and northward or PTC has more people commuting to ATL than HC I would suspect. I just don't think it makes sense here anytime soon. Not saying it would never be needed here, but not for another 20 years. There are GRTA park & ride express bus stops in McDonough, Hampton, and Stockbridge currently that people use. If the DOT doesn't even think we need 4 free lanes of interstate, why would we need MARTA? I would prefer the interstate be made more adequate before anything else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 08:06 AM
 
Location: O4W
3,744 posts, read 4,763,439 times
Reputation: 2076
Does anyone on here know what "preparing for the future" means?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 08:39 AM
 
142 posts, read 167,004 times
Reputation: 194
Yes, sure. But the traffic crisis and the much larger population on the north side should be addressed first. Can MARTA spread in every direction all at once? I'm not opposed to preparing for the future of course, and maybe MARTA should/could be part of that, but I do think it is important the roads in HC & 75 are given attention first. If it was part of ATL to Macon rail, that would have a better chance of success IMO. However, HC leadership is super slow to act, so I would imagine any sort of action would be painfully long and drawn out. Commissioner Holmes alone will not bring MARTA here. (PS-I do like what he's done for north Henry, not knocking him. He is a good advocate for that area.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 09:16 AM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,664,152 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by GA5mom View Post
Yes, sure. But the traffic crisis and the much larger population on the north side should be addressed first. Can MARTA spread in every direction all at once? I'm not opposed to preparing for the future of course, and maybe MARTA should/could be part of that, but I do think it is important the roads in HC & 75 are given attention first. If it was part of ATL to Macon rail, that would have a better chance of success IMO. However, HC leadership is super slow to act, so I would imagine any sort of action would be painfully long and drawn out. Commissioner Holmes alone will not bring MARTA here. (PS-I do like what he's done for north Henry, not knocking him. He is a good advocate for that area.)
Well, I mean, is there a particular reason why it couldn't? Given adequate funding, MARTA could theoretically go about finishing all of it's studies and engineering work, and begin construction as soon as that was done on all its planned expansions, all at the same time.

Notice how Clayton rail isn't ever mentioned as part of the $8 Bil. expansion efforts. That's because it already has a funding source, and can continue study and design work without interfering with the other plans.

Henry would be very similar, in that they would probably do a similar deal since Clayton has set the precedent.

Of course, as others have pointed out, Henry Co. won't draw quite the same amount of revenue, which will limit how its build out might take place. The real question then, would be, if the state would be ready to offer funding to help NS increase freight capacity, while negotiating commuter / inter-city rail, how willing the Feds would be to backing MARTA's & the State's funds, and how much can be saved by using the facilities planned to be built for Clayton.

All of this is in the future, though, and as you point out, it probably won't happen for a while. It WOULD be nice, however, if this could be negotiated right after Clayton Co. is, to keep momentum with NS on accepting transit onto their land. It would streamline things if we could just go from one construction project laying rail to the next.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 11:27 AM
 
31,995 posts, read 36,572,943 times
Reputation: 13254
If Henry is ready to strap on an additional 1% tax I say let them do it.

It does seem like counties that are joining MARTA 50 years after the fact should make some kind of one time catch up payment. I realize a lot of their residents have probably been paying into MARTA already but there's bound to be a gap from what they would have owed if they'd joined at the beginning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 11:34 AM
 
Location: NW Atlanta
6,495 posts, read 6,078,433 times
Reputation: 4453
Quote:
Originally Posted by arjay57 View Post
If Henry is ready to strap on an additional 1% tax I say let them do it.

It does seem like counties that are joining MARTA 50 years after the fact should make some kind of one time catch up payment. I realize a lot of their residents have probably been paying into MARTA already but there's bound to be a gap from what they would have owed if they'd joined at the beginning.
That's the fastest way to discourage them from joining.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 05:14 PM
 
Location: Augusta GA
880 posts, read 2,852,903 times
Reputation: 368
Actually GA5mom, PTC would be the last place to ever approve Marta. Very anti-transit population and govt. Not that long ago they even voted down shuttle buses for the elderly and disabled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top