Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-14-2015, 04:45 PM
 
188 posts, read 177,627 times
Reputation: 139

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
And you might want to try actually reading next time. I'll be nice and break it down for you this time. A profitable system doesn't mean the system itself sees the profits. MARTA is profitable, NYC Subway is profitable, Amtrak is profitable, CTA is profitable.
Those systems are 'profitable' because they receive massive tax assistance. The systems are not profitable on their operations. In order for MARTA to be self sufficient, they would have to raise prices up over $6 per ride. That is how massively inefficient the system is. 99+% of transit in the US falls in this category.

That is like saying Ms. Welfare Queen living off government assistance is 'self sufficient.'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-14-2015, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,352 posts, read 6,520,959 times
Reputation: 5169
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirkMcGirt View Post
Those systems are 'profitable' because they receive massive tax assistance. The systems are not profitable on their operations. In order for MARTA to be self sufficient, they would have to raise prices up over $6 per ride. That is how massively inefficient the system is. 99+% of transit in the US falls in this category.

That is like saying Ms. Welfare Queen living off government assistance is 'self sufficient.'
And the economic impact they have far exceeds the assistance, which is the definition of profitable, when revenues exceed expenses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 06:27 PM
 
188 posts, read 177,627 times
Reputation: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
And the economic impact they have far exceeds the assistance, which is the definition of profitable, when revenues exceed expenses.
Economic impact is a nebulous term that gets thrown around to justify foolish spending. Justify the $100 million annual deficit this foolish project would incur with real numbers. If it were such a slam dunk, these projects would be popping up all over the country. Instead, there is one high speed rail line. Hmmm... makes you think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 08:44 PM
 
10,974 posts, read 10,868,101 times
Reputation: 3435
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirkMcGirt View Post
Economic impact is a nebulous term that gets thrown around to justify foolish spending. Justify the $100 million annual deficit this foolish project would incur with real numbers. If it were such a slam dunk, these projects would be popping up all over the country. Instead, there is one high speed rail line. Hmmm... makes you think.
Still more than roads which bring in $0. See Texas Central Railway and others like it. But government makes it difficult even for a private company to build passenger rail. Also it is really tough to be profitable when the government gives your competition away for free. Profitable passenger rail companies are the norm basically everywhere else in the world where they don't have to compete with heavily subsidized competition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 08:59 PM
 
1,057 posts, read 867,591 times
Reputation: 792
Wow dirk. Let's get rid of roads, the police, teachers, etc. I'm not seeing any profit there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 09:09 PM
 
188 posts, read 177,627 times
Reputation: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by -thomass View Post
Wow dirk. Let's get rid of roads, the police, teachers, etc. I'm not seeing any profit there.
Paying $2 billion to connect to the economic powerhouse of Columbus, GA is insane. What is that place known for? Military surplus stores, tattoo parlors and payday lenders. That $2 billion would better spent fixing Atlanta's problems. Heck... this plan makes the Clifton Corridor look like a great deal (which it still isn't).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 10:49 PM
 
1,350 posts, read 2,299,326 times
Reputation: 960
Savannah, Macon and Athens make more sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 05:33 AM
 
Location: Columbus, GA and Brookhaven, GA
5,616 posts, read 8,642,473 times
Reputation: 2390
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirkMcGirt View Post
Paying $2 billion to connect to the economic powerhouse of Columbus, GA is insane. What is that place known for? Military surplus stores, tattoo parlors and payday lenders. That $2 billion would better spent fixing Atlanta's problems. Heck... this plan makes the Clifton Corridor look like a great deal (which it still isn't).
Oh I don't know maybe the largest corporate base outside of Atlanta. Companies like Aflac, Synovus, TSYS, Carmike Cinemas, Char-Broil, BCBS of Georgia and home to one of the largest military bases in the country. The largest urban whitewater course in the world as well that attracts thousands each year. So yea, not important to Georgia at all.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 05:39 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,849,415 times
Reputation: 5703
If NC can have a regional rail system and make it work, then why can't GA figure it out?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 08:48 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
3,573 posts, read 5,306,779 times
Reputation: 2396
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
If NC can have a regional rail system and make it work, then why can't GA figure it out?
It's that gosh darn demographic hump that Georgia just can't seem to get over.

The point-man for originally selling the concept of MARTA to the state was former Atlanta Mayor Sam Massell.

A few decades gone by, a couple of demographic changes, and some party-switches later...now you can't even speak of the name MARTA without the usual snide remarks under breath.

And begging had to be involved to even get Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed on a transit panel leading up to the failed 2012 TSPLOST referendum. What a full circle that is, huh?

Meanwhile in North Carolina, both the capitol city Raleigh and the largest city Charlotte have been able to create and consistently expand top-notch masstransit/rail with relatively miniscule issues.

And I bet the NC cities don't have their local major paper and other corporate media schizophrenically half-azz praise and overwhelming bash their premeire transit agencies at every opportunity.

This tribalism thing the American south has is pretty intense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top