Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-29-2016, 06:41 AM
 
6,479 posts, read 7,161,333 times
Reputation: 1970

Advertisements

Quote:
Senators voted 36-16 along party lines to hold a referendum in November on a proposal to replace the elected DeKalb CEO with a professional manager appointed by the county commission.Republicans have advocated the change for years in Democrat-controlled DeKalb. But the issue has taken on greater urgency in the last couple of years, with the suspension and subsequent conviction of former DeKalb CEO Burrell Ellis for attempted extortion and three counts of perjury in a scheme to solicit campaign contributions from companies that do business with the county.
After Ellis’ departure, Interim CEO Lee May hired two special investigators to probe allegations of corruption in county government. The investigators, including former Georgia Attorney General Mike Bowers, returned with a report calling the level of corruption “stunning” and calling on May to resign.
“This is not a cure for DeKalb County,” said Sen. Fran Millar, R-Dunwoody, the bill’s sponsor. “But it’s certainly a good start.”
Senate Democrats from DeKalb didn’t object to getting rid of the CEO position. But several complained the seven county commission districts mapped out in the bill were skewed against black voters.
“A county that is 67 percent minority shouldn’t have three districts with less than 20 percent African-American [voters],” said Senate Minority Leader Steve Henson, D-Tucker.
Sen. Gloria Butler, D-Stone Mountain, said Millar’s map also ignored communities of interest, a violation of accepted redistricting principles.
http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/b...sh-dekalb.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-29-2016, 07:36 AM
bu2
 
24,070 posts, read 14,863,435 times
Reputation: 12904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Airforceguy View Post
Misleading comment by Henson. 67% "minority", but not all of that is Black. And there are few non-Blacks in the southern part of the county, so when you have 3 southern districts that are 90%+ Black, that doesn't leave as many for the other 4 districts, especially the 3 northernmost.

TPTB just like having the CEO position and being able to control it. They want to study and study and delay and delay and hope people forget about it. The districting is just another red herring to distract.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2016, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Atlanta, Birmingham, Charlotte, and Raleigh
2,580 posts, read 2,483,890 times
Reputation: 1614
I doubt it will make it through...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top