![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 400,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 13,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Kinda just drains the existing water supply - they're just using tap and filtering it and then putting it in bottles. It was on the news a while back much to the shock of my sister who drinks a gallon of the stuff a day. She's now a "Deer Park" woman. ![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Actually, i think we wouldn't need to bury the pipelines. Manhattan has to in order to go under the Hudson. Atlanta could leave the pipes above ground and have them run alongside a nice fast rail to Savannah.... |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, I know. ;-)
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
This goes so show that the idiots who run this great State are even more delusional than I thought they were. I guess when praying for rain doesn't work, you resort to stealing it from your neighbor.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() I do like the idea of pipelines, but I like the idea of reservoirs better. Maybe we could do a little bit of both? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If it wasn't for their extravagant requirements, the Atlanta metro would be swimming in drinking water... |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have family that lives in Alabama and they complain about Atlanta hogging all the water and yet they have NO water restrictions!!
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not saying that our state government isn't delusional in many matters, but the reality is that the state line was set by Congress to be at the 35th (I think) parallel, and the survey marker was incorrectly placed, and is not at the actual line set by Congress - that is not really in dispute. Now the question that will have to be addressed is the fact that this boundary has stood relatively unchallenged for over 200 years, although according to the AJC the State of GA has challenged it at least 4 times. According to the AJC, if the state boundaries are moved to where Congress actually placed them, a slice of Memphis will be in Mississippi. It should make for an interesting court battle.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Given the numbers I've seen, the Atlanta metro consumes at most between 2% and 4% of the water that is released from Lake Lanier. This assumes that you count water "consumed" as the difference between water taken out of the lake or river and water put back into the river after processing. Even if you don't count the substantial put-back, Atlanta is legally restricted to only using 13.9% of the water from Lake Lanier. Folks downstream would still get 86.1% of the flow even if Atlanta grabbed all of its rightful water and didn't return any of it to the river. As it is, they probably see 96-98% of the water that gets released. |
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It's free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|