|

06-25-2008, 03:43 PM
|
|
GA,MD,WV Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NE Georgia
2,242 posts, read 2,184,423 times
Reputation: 890
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPD
There are train tracks all over this city and state that can be used for commuter rail. It is my understanding that CSX has already agreed to share the rails that they own. That doesn't mean ALL the rails are in place, though. More rail would have to be built in some places. I think there are some stretches along the Athens to Atlanta "Brain Train" where new lines would need to be installed. Again, I'll have to look into this some more as I can't recall the exact details.
|
One area of the CSX sharing was the "Brain Train" design. From downtown, Emory, to Lawrenceville, to Winder, to Athens.
This was from what I understand the "original" mindset of expanding rail to Atlanta. The cost would have been nominal, the stops are already in place, and for the north side you would connect not only Gwinnett, but Barrow and Clarke, which are also growing by leaps and bounds.
This is the main thing that brought my dander up on the emotional side. In Gwinnett, we have this, what I call our "Super Developer" Mossberger who granted had done a fine job in developing town centers in Suwanee, Buford, Dacula, etc., That's ok, however, he is the main one sounding the horn to build out MARTA directly to Gwinnett Place, to the Mall of GA, with connection to Dacula. Now, notice the pattern? all stopping by "his" town center areas  Of course, it will be us who will bear the brunt of the multi billion (with a B) dollar price tag through increased taxation.
Going back to the first item. As a fiscal conservative it just bothers the bejesus out of me when A: we already have the track, B: CSX would sublease the track, C: Have terminals in place that can be re-modeled at a low price, and D: would offer a quick path to transit. All the while still providing enough cash to make sure safety is at the forefront.
Instead, we have mulitple politicians involved, developers licking their lips, and of course Atlanta's finest in currupt politicians scaping for the biggest piece of taxpayers pie.
All the while, we get to sit each day staring at the bumper in front of us. Or driving in gridlock so you can ride a train a few miles. 
Heck, the last time I checked the tracks have been there for years.
|
|

06-25-2008, 03:56 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
360 posts, read 173,121 times
Reputation: 78
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merin
I have a question, there are not already train tracks that could be used for a commuter rail?
|
I'm not sure how Lovejoy came to be the initial route but here is the proposed commuter rail network that it comes from. If i'm not mistaken, nearly all of it would be on existing tracks.

|
|

06-25-2008, 09:27 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: West Cobb County, GA (Atlanta metro)
5,994 posts, read 5,627,087 times
Reputation: 1866
|
|
|
J2 - interesting map. I hadn't seen that one. Where did you find it?
If that map is something that the State government was looking at or the newly born-again Governor, it sheds some light into odd priorities. If the tracks are in place, and the purpose of commuter rail is to remove as many cars from the road as possible, I fail to see how the Lovejoy line would do that. The line which would ultimately end up in Gainesville would be the most logical choice and hit the most congested areas of the metro. Followed by the only "proposed" Cartersville and/or Canton routes. I would put Lovejoy down there in the same priority as Senoia or Madison if we're talking about easing traffic congestion.
It's a shame that West Cobb/Paulding is still so sparsely populated (relatively speaking that is). The proposed Rome route would bring it right through Powder Springs and I could ride the thing into town, but in reality, I think we're still a number of years away before a Rome route would be logical in both terms of "need" and money spent to get it up and running. Same with Bremen, though as far as Douglasville might be on that list of needs if that area keeps growing the way it has.
|
|

06-25-2008, 09:58 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
350 posts, read 334,633 times
Reputation: 73
|
|
|
Marta should jack up its prices. Try a zoning structure like other cities. Further out of downtown the more you pay in rings. I use it all the time when I fly out on business and wouldn't mind paying $5 one way from Medical center to the airport. I can walk to the station from my house and it sure beats $60 for a few days parking, the hassel of driving down to the airport and the cost of fuel. When friends and clients fly in from other countries they cannot believe how cheap it is.
|
|

06-25-2008, 10:16 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
262 posts, read 198,922 times
Reputation: 89
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackrabbit
Marta should jack up its prices. Try a zoning structure like other cities. Further out of downtown the more you pay in rings. I use it all the time when I fly out on business and wouldn't mind paying $5 one way from Medical center to the airport. I can walk to the station from my house and it sure beats $60 for a few days parking, the hassel of driving down to the airport and the cost of fuel. When friends and clients fly in from other countries they cannot believe how cheap it is.
|
I dont know how I really feel about zone fare. I mean if they would like to increase the flat rate I can understand, however I can't see how they justify charging someone depending on their stop. If I get on the train at Buckhead and get off at Civic Center, why should I have to pay more to go the airport, the train is going no matter what. I'm for rate increases if it's justified for expansion and or operation, but zone fare does not make sense. Now this argument does not apply to commuter rail, if ride to Athens I don't expect to pay 1.75. 
|
|

06-25-2008, 10:25 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
350 posts, read 334,633 times
Reputation: 73
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by onemanarmy
I dont know how I really feel about zone fare. I mean if they would like to increase the flat rate I can understand, however I can't see how they justify charging someone depending on their stop. If I get on the train at Buckhead and get off at Civic Center, why should I have to pay more to go the airport, the train is going no matter what. I'm for rate increases if it's justified for expansion and or operation, but zone fare does not make sense. Now this argument does not apply to commuter rail, if ride to Athens I don't expect to pay 1.75. 
|
It works well in other cities. In your comparison you are travelling further so why not pay more? You are in theory also saving more the further you ride on the train.
I really don't understand how say a 25c increase each way would impact anyone yet it would probably push Marta into profitability and enable them to expand.
|
|

06-26-2008, 07:12 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
2,124 posts, read 1,516,725 times
Reputation: 391
|
|
|
Fares should be charged not only on a zone basis, but also on a time basis. This would eliminate a lot of the bums who ride the Marta trains all day.
|
|

06-26-2008, 07:17 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
2,124 posts, read 1,516,725 times
Reputation: 391
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgia
Going back to the first item. As a fiscal conservative it just bothers the bejesus out of me when A: we already have the track, B: CSX would sublease the track, C: Have terminals in place that can be re-modeled at a low price, and D: would offer a quick path to transit.
|
The problem with this is that commuter rail is not a general purpose transit system like MARTA. It is a system designed to get people to their jobs during rush hour and the trains would not run nearly as often as MARTA trains. It's not a system that would be useful for everyday running around and trips to the mall, like a good subway system is (or should be).
|
|

06-26-2008, 07:37 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: metro Atlanta
100 posts, read 98,005 times
Reputation: 18
|
|
Quote:
|
What I am saying is that Atlanta and the planning officials in GA need to consider that commuting to downtown is NOT the only flow of traffic. This doesn't ever seem to enter into the equation
|
This was my point, too. Here in Atlanta, how many people would use it. MARTA doesn't pay for itself as it doesn't have enough riders. It is poorly managed, but I am glad it is here at the minimum. I wish it would go more places. IPublic transporation here is too centralized around downtown. More jobs within the past 2 decades already are located north of dowtown, little cities among themselves: Buckhead, Dunwoody, Alpharetta, Marietta and Duluth come to mind with skyscrapers and lots of office workers. The current mass transit isn't geared for accomodating that. So that is my point about it not accomodating enough riders.
I *like* public transportation. I have used it in many cities in the world and in the US. In the US, I think Chicago's and DC's were pretty decent.
Gwinnett voters should vote for the expansion of MARTA, it will be interesting to see how that plays out.
|
|

06-26-2008, 08:05 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
6,574 posts, read 6,417,026 times
Reputation: 1445
|
|
|
There's something everyone seems to be missing in the talk about "the tracks are already there- we just need to use them"- the majority of the tracks in question are single tracks, which aren't exactly set up for "commuter rail", which requires dual tracks for trains running in both directions. Additionally, these tracks currently see very limited use, and the many grade crossings that exist aren't designed to accomodate the frequency of trains required for effective commuter rail service. So, while it's better to start with an existing right-of-way and track than with nothing, there's still a huge expense in putting a line like this into operation- you don't just drop a train on the tracks and open for business.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|