Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-25-2010, 06:19 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
153 posts, read 509,706 times
Reputation: 57

Advertisements

Now, to your "green" question, Austin Energy is showing statistics in this document that shows 10% electricity from renewable resources for 2009 and 2010.

As you compare the plans, be sure to compare fixed monthly charges vs. variable rate per kWh. Power to choose ranks them by 1000 kWh usage but the EFL will list the price per kWh for 500, 1000, and 2000 kWh. Some companies have sneaky tricks like no monthly fee if you use over 500 kWh, so their monthly fee for 499 kWh usage and below never shows up on the price comparison in the EFL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2010, 06:40 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
153 posts, read 509,706 times
Reputation: 57
And, finally, here's what I use. We have Brilliant Energy, a small company which was pushed for some reason by our builder, but it worked out nicely so far with no problems. A simple plan with 10 cents per kWh, no monthly fee (except mandatory smart meter surcharge), locked in for 12 months. Since then, they have changed their plan details for new customers (added a low usage fee) and I'm not sure I will keep them as my REP as a result. I think our renewable content is around 2-5%. I might also switch to a plan with more renewable content in the future, but I believe ultimately it needs to be market-driven or government policy driven to have an impact. Non-renewable energy needs to become costly enough (pollution, global warming, externalities, tax, scarcity) for renewable energy to become affordable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2010, 10:43 PM
 
Location: Corvallis, Oregon
653 posts, read 1,787,719 times
Reputation: 276
I went with TXU and the 100% wind energy plan.
I picked them because that is what the previous owner uses them. (I understand that I did not have to pick the same supplier, and that it will probably make no difference related to non interrupted power).

So if my contract starts the exact same date, the previous owner is requesting turn off, there should be no interruption, correct?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top